{"title":"不同时空尺度对不同联合物种分布模式的影响——以西北太平洋中上层鱼类为例","authors":"Xingnan Fang, Ping Zhang, Qinwang Xing, Xinjun Chen, Jie Cao, Heng Zhang, Wei Yu","doi":"10.1111/jbi.15154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Joint Species Distribution Models (JSDMs) have become a critical tool in community ecology research, with a wide scope of application that is continuously expanding. However, inferring interspecies relationships from co-occurrence data remains a challenge. This study examined the impact of varying spatiotemporal scales on JSDMs, with a focus on model stability and the evaluation of interspecies relationships.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>The northwest Pacific Ocean.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Taxon</h3>\n \n <p>Japanese sardine; Chub mackerel; Neon flying squid.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>To comprehensively evaluate the impact of varying spatiotemporal scales on JSDMs, this study was designed using two temporal scales (monthly and annual), four spatial scales (0.25°, 0.5°, 1°, and 2°), and four different JSDMs (Bayescomm, HMSC, Boral, and Gjam). Using three economically important pelagic fish species from the northwest Pacific Ocean as examples—Japanese sardine (<i>Sardinops melanostictus</i>), chub mackerel (<i>Scomber japonicus</i>), and neon flying squid (<i>Ommastrephes bartramii</i>)—we compared the performance of the models across 32 different spatiotemporal scales.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Our results indicate that the spatiotemporal scale significantly affects the performance of JSDMs, with notable differences among the models. As spatial scales become finer and temporal scales longer, model simulation and prediction performance improve, and stability increases. Moreover, spatial scale has a substantial impact on the evaluation of interspecies relationships, as finer spatial scales can better evaluate interspecific relationships. Among the models, HMSC demonstrated better balancing performance, while the Boral model showed the least stability. Overall, the optimal JSDM identified was the HMSC model with an annual temporal and 0.25° spatial scale.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Spatiotemporal scales have a significant impact on JSDMs, particularly when inferring the strength of interspecies relationships. Therefore, it is recommended that researchers carefully design the model based on the spatiotemporal scales of their data and select the optimal model to enhance predictive performance and improve the interpretative validity of the results.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15299,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biogeography","volume":"52 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Varying Spatiotemporal Scales on Different Joint Species Distribution Models: A Case Study of Pelagic Fish Species in the Northwest Pacific Ocean\",\"authors\":\"Xingnan Fang, Ping Zhang, Qinwang Xing, Xinjun Chen, Jie Cao, Heng Zhang, Wei Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jbi.15154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>Joint Species Distribution Models (JSDMs) have become a critical tool in community ecology research, with a wide scope of application that is continuously expanding. However, inferring interspecies relationships from co-occurrence data remains a challenge. This study examined the impact of varying spatiotemporal scales on JSDMs, with a focus on model stability and the evaluation of interspecies relationships.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Location</h3>\\n \\n <p>The northwest Pacific Ocean.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Taxon</h3>\\n \\n <p>Japanese sardine; Chub mackerel; Neon flying squid.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>To comprehensively evaluate the impact of varying spatiotemporal scales on JSDMs, this study was designed using two temporal scales (monthly and annual), four spatial scales (0.25°, 0.5°, 1°, and 2°), and four different JSDMs (Bayescomm, HMSC, Boral, and Gjam). Using three economically important pelagic fish species from the northwest Pacific Ocean as examples—Japanese sardine (<i>Sardinops melanostictus</i>), chub mackerel (<i>Scomber japonicus</i>), and neon flying squid (<i>Ommastrephes bartramii</i>)—we compared the performance of the models across 32 different spatiotemporal scales.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our results indicate that the spatiotemporal scale significantly affects the performance of JSDMs, with notable differences among the models. As spatial scales become finer and temporal scales longer, model simulation and prediction performance improve, and stability increases. Moreover, spatial scale has a substantial impact on the evaluation of interspecies relationships, as finer spatial scales can better evaluate interspecific relationships. Among the models, HMSC demonstrated better balancing performance, while the Boral model showed the least stability. Overall, the optimal JSDM identified was the HMSC model with an annual temporal and 0.25° spatial scale.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Spatiotemporal scales have a significant impact on JSDMs, particularly when inferring the strength of interspecies relationships. Therefore, it is recommended that researchers carefully design the model based on the spatiotemporal scales of their data and select the optimal model to enhance predictive performance and improve the interpretative validity of the results.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biogeography\",\"volume\":\"52 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biogeography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbi.15154\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbi.15154","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的联合物种分布模型(Joint Species Distribution Models, JSDMs)已成为群落生态学研究的重要工具,其应用范围广泛且不断扩大。然而,从共生数据推断物种间关系仍然是一个挑战。本研究考察了不同时空尺度对JSDMs的影响,重点关注了模型稳定性和种间关系的评估。地理位置:西北太平洋。日本沙丁鱼;白鲑鲭鱼;霓虹飞天乌贼。方法为综合评价不同时空尺度对JSDMs的影响,本研究采用2个时间尺度(月、年)、4个空间尺度(0.25°、0.5°、1°、2°)和4种不同的JSDMs (Bayescomm、HMSC、Boral和Gjam)进行设计。以西北太平洋三种具有重要经济意义的中远洋鱼类为例——日本沙丁鱼(Sardinops melanotictus)、鲐鱼(Scomber japonicus)和霓虹飞鱼(Ommastrephes bartramii)——我们比较了这些模型在32个不同时空尺度上的表现。结果时空尺度对jsdm的性能有显著影响,不同模型间存在显著差异。空间尺度越细,时间尺度越长,模型的模拟和预测性能越好,稳定性越高。此外,空间尺度对种间关系的评价也有重要影响,更精细的空间尺度能更好地评价种间关系。其中,HMSC模型的平衡性能较好,而Boral模型的稳定性最差。总体而言,确定的最佳JSDM为年时间尺度和0.25°空间尺度的HMSC模型。时空尺度对JSDMs有显著影响,特别是在推断种间关系强度时。因此,建议研究人员根据数据的时空尺度精心设计模型,选择最优模型,以增强预测性能,提高结果的解释效度。
The Impact of Varying Spatiotemporal Scales on Different Joint Species Distribution Models: A Case Study of Pelagic Fish Species in the Northwest Pacific Ocean
Aim
Joint Species Distribution Models (JSDMs) have become a critical tool in community ecology research, with a wide scope of application that is continuously expanding. However, inferring interspecies relationships from co-occurrence data remains a challenge. This study examined the impact of varying spatiotemporal scales on JSDMs, with a focus on model stability and the evaluation of interspecies relationships.
Location
The northwest Pacific Ocean.
Taxon
Japanese sardine; Chub mackerel; Neon flying squid.
Methods
To comprehensively evaluate the impact of varying spatiotemporal scales on JSDMs, this study was designed using two temporal scales (monthly and annual), four spatial scales (0.25°, 0.5°, 1°, and 2°), and four different JSDMs (Bayescomm, HMSC, Boral, and Gjam). Using three economically important pelagic fish species from the northwest Pacific Ocean as examples—Japanese sardine (Sardinops melanostictus), chub mackerel (Scomber japonicus), and neon flying squid (Ommastrephes bartramii)—we compared the performance of the models across 32 different spatiotemporal scales.
Results
Our results indicate that the spatiotemporal scale significantly affects the performance of JSDMs, with notable differences among the models. As spatial scales become finer and temporal scales longer, model simulation and prediction performance improve, and stability increases. Moreover, spatial scale has a substantial impact on the evaluation of interspecies relationships, as finer spatial scales can better evaluate interspecific relationships. Among the models, HMSC demonstrated better balancing performance, while the Boral model showed the least stability. Overall, the optimal JSDM identified was the HMSC model with an annual temporal and 0.25° spatial scale.
Main Conclusions
Spatiotemporal scales have a significant impact on JSDMs, particularly when inferring the strength of interspecies relationships. Therefore, it is recommended that researchers carefully design the model based on the spatiotemporal scales of their data and select the optimal model to enhance predictive performance and improve the interpretative validity of the results.
期刊介绍:
Papers dealing with all aspects of spatial, ecological and historical biogeography are considered for publication in Journal of Biogeography. The mission of the journal is to contribute to the growth and societal relevance of the discipline of biogeography through its role in the dissemination of biogeographical research.