Xiaocong Song , Shuai Du , Chenning Deng , Fang Zhu , Linzi Li , Peng Shen , Minghui Xie
{"title":"从固体废物中再生陶粒的减碳效益是什么?碳足迹的新视角","authors":"Xiaocong Song , Shuai Du , Chenning Deng , Fang Zhu , Linzi Li , Peng Shen , Minghui Xie","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The ceramsite industry is experiencing the demand for low-carbon transformations; therefore, solid waste is gradually being used for raw materials. However, the carbon footprint of ceramsite products produced from solid waste and the extent of future carbon-reduction benefits remain unclear. Therefore, this study evaluated the carbon footprints of sludge, fly ash, and aluminum ash, common hazardous waste ceramsite products that are difficult to recycle. The carbon reduction potential of the three solid-waste ceramsite products were predicted and evaluated based on scenario analysis. The simultaneous addition of sludge and aluminum ash to produce ceramsite was sustainable and improved its carbon performance. Sludge‑aluminum ash ceramsite from Zhejiang Province, China, achieved carbon reduction benefits of approximately 29 % and 5 % compared to the sludge ceramsite in Zhejiang Province and fly ash ceramsite in Shandong Province, respectively. The three single factor low-carbon scenarios optimized the raw material (RMO), transportation (TO), and power (EO) structures. Under the TO and EO scenarios, a single solid-waste ceramsite product achieved maximum carbon reductions of 0.08 kg, which was lower than that of the RMO scenario (0.40 kg). In the other three collaborative low-carbon optimization scenarios, the carbon reduction potential of scenario RM-TO (simultaneously optimizing raw material and transportation structures, 12–68 %) was higher than that of scenario T-EO (simultaneously optimizing transportation and power structures). The emission reduction potential of simultaneously optimizing the three factors was the highest (∼70 %). Considering economic and time constraints, the joint optimization of transportation and raw material structure is preferred for Chinese ceramsite products.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"116 ","pages":"Article 108077"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What are the carbon reduction benefits of regenerating ceramsite from solid waste? A new perspective on carbon footprint\",\"authors\":\"Xiaocong Song , Shuai Du , Chenning Deng , Fang Zhu , Linzi Li , Peng Shen , Minghui Xie\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The ceramsite industry is experiencing the demand for low-carbon transformations; therefore, solid waste is gradually being used for raw materials. However, the carbon footprint of ceramsite products produced from solid waste and the extent of future carbon-reduction benefits remain unclear. Therefore, this study evaluated the carbon footprints of sludge, fly ash, and aluminum ash, common hazardous waste ceramsite products that are difficult to recycle. The carbon reduction potential of the three solid-waste ceramsite products were predicted and evaluated based on scenario analysis. The simultaneous addition of sludge and aluminum ash to produce ceramsite was sustainable and improved its carbon performance. Sludge‑aluminum ash ceramsite from Zhejiang Province, China, achieved carbon reduction benefits of approximately 29 % and 5 % compared to the sludge ceramsite in Zhejiang Province and fly ash ceramsite in Shandong Province, respectively. The three single factor low-carbon scenarios optimized the raw material (RMO), transportation (TO), and power (EO) structures. Under the TO and EO scenarios, a single solid-waste ceramsite product achieved maximum carbon reductions of 0.08 kg, which was lower than that of the RMO scenario (0.40 kg). In the other three collaborative low-carbon optimization scenarios, the carbon reduction potential of scenario RM-TO (simultaneously optimizing raw material and transportation structures, 12–68 %) was higher than that of scenario T-EO (simultaneously optimizing transportation and power structures). The emission reduction potential of simultaneously optimizing the three factors was the highest (∼70 %). Considering economic and time constraints, the joint optimization of transportation and raw material structure is preferred for Chinese ceramsite products.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"volume\":\"116 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108077\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525002744\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525002744","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
What are the carbon reduction benefits of regenerating ceramsite from solid waste? A new perspective on carbon footprint
The ceramsite industry is experiencing the demand for low-carbon transformations; therefore, solid waste is gradually being used for raw materials. However, the carbon footprint of ceramsite products produced from solid waste and the extent of future carbon-reduction benefits remain unclear. Therefore, this study evaluated the carbon footprints of sludge, fly ash, and aluminum ash, common hazardous waste ceramsite products that are difficult to recycle. The carbon reduction potential of the three solid-waste ceramsite products were predicted and evaluated based on scenario analysis. The simultaneous addition of sludge and aluminum ash to produce ceramsite was sustainable and improved its carbon performance. Sludge‑aluminum ash ceramsite from Zhejiang Province, China, achieved carbon reduction benefits of approximately 29 % and 5 % compared to the sludge ceramsite in Zhejiang Province and fly ash ceramsite in Shandong Province, respectively. The three single factor low-carbon scenarios optimized the raw material (RMO), transportation (TO), and power (EO) structures. Under the TO and EO scenarios, a single solid-waste ceramsite product achieved maximum carbon reductions of 0.08 kg, which was lower than that of the RMO scenario (0.40 kg). In the other three collaborative low-carbon optimization scenarios, the carbon reduction potential of scenario RM-TO (simultaneously optimizing raw material and transportation structures, 12–68 %) was higher than that of scenario T-EO (simultaneously optimizing transportation and power structures). The emission reduction potential of simultaneously optimizing the three factors was the highest (∼70 %). Considering economic and time constraints, the joint optimization of transportation and raw material structure is preferred for Chinese ceramsite products.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.