Bruno S. Zossi , Franco D. Medina , Trinidad Duran , María A. Vega Caro , Blas F. de Haro Barbas , Ana G. Elias
{"title":"foF2长期电离层趋势分析的信号分解技术","authors":"Bruno S. Zossi , Franco D. Medina , Trinidad Duran , María A. Vega Caro , Blas F. de Haro Barbas , Ana G. Elias","doi":"10.1016/j.gloplacha.2025.104979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Four signal decomposition techniques were applied to the problem of estimating ionospheric long-term trends: a variant of Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD), Seasonal and Trend decomposition using Loess (STL), Singular Spectrum Analysis (SSA), and Fourier Transform (FT). This is the first time these techniques have been used to estimate ionospheric trends. The results were compared with the classic double-step linear regression method, the most used method to filter the solar influence from the ionospheric foF2, and with atmospheric general circulation models. Since yearly average ionospheric data exhibit strong linear correlation with solar EUV proxies, we analyze five solar flux indices at radio wavelengths alongside ionospheric data from 9 stations covering the period 1976–2022. The decomposition models can be used independently on every time series to filter periodicities and trends. The proxies are scaled to ionospheric data range using a linear regression, and the residuals are subtracted in order to estimate trends. The results using solar flux F15 are in good agreement with trends predicted by atmospheric circulation models of 0.7 %/decade, STL and SSA result in −0.8 %/decade, and FT in −0.5 %/decade; most models and proxies result in a negative averaged trend. F10.7 trends are lower than expected, about −0.2 %/decade for SSA and STL, and − 0.1 %/decade using FT. Among the tested methods, the FT provides the most consistent results. CEEMDAN can also estimate reliable results, but only when solar and ionospheric data are filtered in the same number of steps. This work demonstrates how novel techniques can complement the study of long-term trends in the upper atmosphere. While recent studies have identified the F30 solar flux as the most suitable proxy for trend estimation, our analysis reveals that it consistently produces stronger negative trends than expected. In contrast, the F15 solar flux, an index that is rarely used, emerges as the most reliable proxy using the methodology presented in this work.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55089,"journal":{"name":"Global and Planetary Change","volume":"253 ","pages":"Article 104979"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Signal decomposition techniques for foF2 long-term ionospheric trend analysis\",\"authors\":\"Bruno S. Zossi , Franco D. Medina , Trinidad Duran , María A. Vega Caro , Blas F. de Haro Barbas , Ana G. Elias\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gloplacha.2025.104979\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Four signal decomposition techniques were applied to the problem of estimating ionospheric long-term trends: a variant of Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD), Seasonal and Trend decomposition using Loess (STL), Singular Spectrum Analysis (SSA), and Fourier Transform (FT). This is the first time these techniques have been used to estimate ionospheric trends. The results were compared with the classic double-step linear regression method, the most used method to filter the solar influence from the ionospheric foF2, and with atmospheric general circulation models. Since yearly average ionospheric data exhibit strong linear correlation with solar EUV proxies, we analyze five solar flux indices at radio wavelengths alongside ionospheric data from 9 stations covering the period 1976–2022. The decomposition models can be used independently on every time series to filter periodicities and trends. The proxies are scaled to ionospheric data range using a linear regression, and the residuals are subtracted in order to estimate trends. The results using solar flux F15 are in good agreement with trends predicted by atmospheric circulation models of 0.7 %/decade, STL and SSA result in −0.8 %/decade, and FT in −0.5 %/decade; most models and proxies result in a negative averaged trend. F10.7 trends are lower than expected, about −0.2 %/decade for SSA and STL, and − 0.1 %/decade using FT. Among the tested methods, the FT provides the most consistent results. CEEMDAN can also estimate reliable results, but only when solar and ionospheric data are filtered in the same number of steps. This work demonstrates how novel techniques can complement the study of long-term trends in the upper atmosphere. While recent studies have identified the F30 solar flux as the most suitable proxy for trend estimation, our analysis reveals that it consistently produces stronger negative trends than expected. In contrast, the F15 solar flux, an index that is rarely used, emerges as the most reliable proxy using the methodology presented in this work.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global and Planetary Change\",\"volume\":\"253 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104979\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global and Planetary Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921818125002887\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global and Planetary Change","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921818125002887","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Signal decomposition techniques for foF2 long-term ionospheric trend analysis
Four signal decomposition techniques were applied to the problem of estimating ionospheric long-term trends: a variant of Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD), Seasonal and Trend decomposition using Loess (STL), Singular Spectrum Analysis (SSA), and Fourier Transform (FT). This is the first time these techniques have been used to estimate ionospheric trends. The results were compared with the classic double-step linear regression method, the most used method to filter the solar influence from the ionospheric foF2, and with atmospheric general circulation models. Since yearly average ionospheric data exhibit strong linear correlation with solar EUV proxies, we analyze five solar flux indices at radio wavelengths alongside ionospheric data from 9 stations covering the period 1976–2022. The decomposition models can be used independently on every time series to filter periodicities and trends. The proxies are scaled to ionospheric data range using a linear regression, and the residuals are subtracted in order to estimate trends. The results using solar flux F15 are in good agreement with trends predicted by atmospheric circulation models of 0.7 %/decade, STL and SSA result in −0.8 %/decade, and FT in −0.5 %/decade; most models and proxies result in a negative averaged trend. F10.7 trends are lower than expected, about −0.2 %/decade for SSA and STL, and − 0.1 %/decade using FT. Among the tested methods, the FT provides the most consistent results. CEEMDAN can also estimate reliable results, but only when solar and ionospheric data are filtered in the same number of steps. This work demonstrates how novel techniques can complement the study of long-term trends in the upper atmosphere. While recent studies have identified the F30 solar flux as the most suitable proxy for trend estimation, our analysis reveals that it consistently produces stronger negative trends than expected. In contrast, the F15 solar flux, an index that is rarely used, emerges as the most reliable proxy using the methodology presented in this work.
期刊介绍:
The objective of the journal Global and Planetary Change is to provide a multi-disciplinary overview of the processes taking place in the Earth System and involved in planetary change over time. The journal focuses on records of the past and current state of the earth system, and future scenarios , and their link to global environmental change. Regional or process-oriented studies are welcome if they discuss global implications. Topics include, but are not limited to, changes in the dynamics and composition of the atmosphere, oceans and cryosphere, as well as climate change, sea level variation, observations/modelling of Earth processes from deep to (near-)surface and their coupling, global ecology, biogeography and the resilience/thresholds in ecosystems.
Key criteria for the consideration of manuscripts are (a) the relevance for the global scientific community and/or (b) the wider implications for global scale problems, preferably combined with (c) having a significance beyond a single discipline. A clear focus on key processes associated with planetary scale change is strongly encouraged.
Manuscripts can be submitted as either research contributions or as a review article. Every effort should be made towards the presentation of research outcomes in an understandable way for a broad readership.