25个x射线双星的演化周期变化和吸积双星角动量损失的经验普遍规律的测量

Bradley E. Schaefer
{"title":"25个x射线双星的演化周期变化和吸积双星角动量损失的经验普遍规律的测量","authors":"Bradley E. Schaefer","doi":"10.3847/1538-4357/add925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I measure and collect timings of phase markers (like eclipse times) for the orbits of 25 X-ray binaries (XRBs) so as to calculate the steady evolutionary period change ( ). I combine these with my observed measures from 52 cataclysmic variables (CVs). Further, I subtract out the contributions from gravitational radiation ( ) and mass transfer ( ), deriving the period change from the residual unknown angular momentum loss ( = – – ). I have measures for 77 XRBs and CVs, with these being direct measures of the driver of binary evolution. The venerable magnetic braking model of binary evolution has its most fundamental predictions tested, with most systems having predictions wrong by over 1 order of magnitude. Other proposed mechanisms to explain the angular momentum loss (AML) also fail, so we are left with no known mechanism that dominates the AML. An alternative path to the AML law is empirical, where my measures are fitted to a power law involving the fundamental binary properties. With this, the dominant AML law for systems with orbital periods (P) from 0.13–1.0 day is , in appropriate units. Similar AML laws for binaries below the period gap and for binaries with P > 1.0 day are derived. These three AML laws are of good accuracy and are the best representations of the actual evolution for all 77 XRBs and CVs of all classes, so the three taken together can be called “universal.”","PeriodicalId":501813,"journal":{"name":"The Astrophysical Journal","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evolutionary Period Changes for 25 X-Ray Binaries and the Measurement of an Empirical Universal Law for Angular Momentum Loss in Accreting Binaries\",\"authors\":\"Bradley E. Schaefer\",\"doi\":\"10.3847/1538-4357/add925\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I measure and collect timings of phase markers (like eclipse times) for the orbits of 25 X-ray binaries (XRBs) so as to calculate the steady evolutionary period change ( ). I combine these with my observed measures from 52 cataclysmic variables (CVs). Further, I subtract out the contributions from gravitational radiation ( ) and mass transfer ( ), deriving the period change from the residual unknown angular momentum loss ( = – – ). I have measures for 77 XRBs and CVs, with these being direct measures of the driver of binary evolution. The venerable magnetic braking model of binary evolution has its most fundamental predictions tested, with most systems having predictions wrong by over 1 order of magnitude. Other proposed mechanisms to explain the angular momentum loss (AML) also fail, so we are left with no known mechanism that dominates the AML. An alternative path to the AML law is empirical, where my measures are fitted to a power law involving the fundamental binary properties. With this, the dominant AML law for systems with orbital periods (P) from 0.13–1.0 day is , in appropriate units. Similar AML laws for binaries below the period gap and for binaries with P > 1.0 day are derived. These three AML laws are of good accuracy and are the best representations of the actual evolution for all 77 XRBs and CVs of all classes, so the three taken together can be called “universal.”\",\"PeriodicalId\":501813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Astrophysical Journal\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Astrophysical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/add925\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Astrophysical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/add925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我测量并收集了25个x射线双星(XRBs)轨道的相位标记(如日食时间)的时间,以计算稳定的演化周期变化()。我将这些与我从52个灾难性变量(cv)中观察到的测量结果结合起来。此外,我减去重力辐射()和传质()的贡献,从剩余未知角动量损失(= - -)中得出周期变化。我有77个XRBs和cv的度量,这些是二元演化驱动程序的直接度量。久经考验的双星演化磁制动模型已经对其最基本的预测进行了测试,大多数系统的预测错误超过一个数量级。其他提出的解释角动量损失(AML)的机制也失败了,因此我们没有已知的主导AML的机制。反洗钱法的另一条路径是经验性的,我的措施适用于涉及基本二元性质的幂律。因此,轨道周期(P)为0.13-1.0天的系统的主要反洗钱定律是,以适当的单位表示。类似的反洗钱法则适用于期差以下的二进制文件和P > 1.0天的二进制文件。这三个AML定律具有很高的准确性,并且是所有类别的所有77个XRBs和cv的实际演化的最佳表示,因此这三个定律合在一起可以称为“通用”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evolutionary Period Changes for 25 X-Ray Binaries and the Measurement of an Empirical Universal Law for Angular Momentum Loss in Accreting Binaries
I measure and collect timings of phase markers (like eclipse times) for the orbits of 25 X-ray binaries (XRBs) so as to calculate the steady evolutionary period change ( ). I combine these with my observed measures from 52 cataclysmic variables (CVs). Further, I subtract out the contributions from gravitational radiation ( ) and mass transfer ( ), deriving the period change from the residual unknown angular momentum loss ( = – – ). I have measures for 77 XRBs and CVs, with these being direct measures of the driver of binary evolution. The venerable magnetic braking model of binary evolution has its most fundamental predictions tested, with most systems having predictions wrong by over 1 order of magnitude. Other proposed mechanisms to explain the angular momentum loss (AML) also fail, so we are left with no known mechanism that dominates the AML. An alternative path to the AML law is empirical, where my measures are fitted to a power law involving the fundamental binary properties. With this, the dominant AML law for systems with orbital periods (P) from 0.13–1.0 day is , in appropriate units. Similar AML laws for binaries below the period gap and for binaries with P > 1.0 day are derived. These three AML laws are of good accuracy and are the best representations of the actual evolution for all 77 XRBs and CVs of all classes, so the three taken together can be called “universal.”
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信