{"title":"心理理论综合评估:一种3 - 8岁儿童心理理论的新测量方法和心理状态量表的评价","authors":"Megan J. Heise, Lindsay C. Bowman","doi":"10.1111/cdev.14263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study describes a novel measure of children's Theory of Mind (ToM) development—called the Comprehensive Assessment of ToM (CAT)—that addresses limitations in existing ToM measures. This behavioral measure includes three–six items each about diverse desires, diverse beliefs, knowledge access, knowledge expertise, false belief, and visual perspective taking, as well as nonsocial representational reasoning (i.e., false‐sign). All items include a prediction, explanation, and general comprehension question. The measure is psychometrically valid and robust in 3‐ to 8‐year‐old children (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 206; 104 boys; 101 girls; 1 gender fluid; 37.7% White non‐Hispanic). Children's performance replicates prior findings with the commonly used Wellman and Liu (2004) ToM scale, but also reveals a novel and nuanced pattern of mental‐state scaling over early to middle childhood.","PeriodicalId":10109,"journal":{"name":"Child development","volume":"192 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Comprehensive Assessment of Theory of Mind (CAT): A Novel Measure of 3‐ to 8‐Year‐Old Children's Theory of Mind and an Evaluation of Mental‐State Scaling\",\"authors\":\"Megan J. Heise, Lindsay C. Bowman\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cdev.14263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study describes a novel measure of children's Theory of Mind (ToM) development—called the Comprehensive Assessment of ToM (CAT)—that addresses limitations in existing ToM measures. This behavioral measure includes three–six items each about diverse desires, diverse beliefs, knowledge access, knowledge expertise, false belief, and visual perspective taking, as well as nonsocial representational reasoning (i.e., false‐sign). All items include a prediction, explanation, and general comprehension question. The measure is psychometrically valid and robust in 3‐ to 8‐year‐old children (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 206; 104 boys; 101 girls; 1 gender fluid; 37.7% White non‐Hispanic). Children's performance replicates prior findings with the commonly used Wellman and Liu (2004) ToM scale, but also reveals a novel and nuanced pattern of mental‐state scaling over early to middle childhood.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child development\",\"volume\":\"192 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.14263\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.14263","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Comprehensive Assessment of Theory of Mind (CAT): A Novel Measure of 3‐ to 8‐Year‐Old Children's Theory of Mind and an Evaluation of Mental‐State Scaling
This study describes a novel measure of children's Theory of Mind (ToM) development—called the Comprehensive Assessment of ToM (CAT)—that addresses limitations in existing ToM measures. This behavioral measure includes three–six items each about diverse desires, diverse beliefs, knowledge access, knowledge expertise, false belief, and visual perspective taking, as well as nonsocial representational reasoning (i.e., false‐sign). All items include a prediction, explanation, and general comprehension question. The measure is psychometrically valid and robust in 3‐ to 8‐year‐old children (n = 206; 104 boys; 101 girls; 1 gender fluid; 37.7% White non‐Hispanic). Children's performance replicates prior findings with the commonly used Wellman and Liu (2004) ToM scale, but also reveals a novel and nuanced pattern of mental‐state scaling over early to middle childhood.
期刊介绍:
As the flagship journal of the Society for Research in Child Development (SRCD), Child Development has published articles, essays, reviews, and tutorials on various topics in the field of child development since 1930. Spanning many disciplines, the journal provides the latest research, not only for researchers and theoreticians, but also for child psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, psychiatric social workers, specialists in early childhood education, educational psychologists, special education teachers, and other researchers. In addition to six issues per year of Child Development, subscribers to the journal also receive a full subscription to Child Development Perspectives and Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.