{"title":"安全运动、举报和情境学习:说出来真的安全吗?","authors":"Sian Knott (Harries), Colin Paterson, E Kavanagh","doi":"10.1136/bjsports-2025-110457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Few issues pose a more urgent threat to athlete health and well-being than the ongoing crisis of abuse in sport.1 There has been growing awareness of the types, prevalence and risk factors of abuse, articulated most recently in the International Olympic Committee (IOC) consensus statement on interpersonal violence and safeguarding in sport,2 alongside broader questions concerning persistent integrity breaches across all levels of sport.3 Recently, global media headlines too often reflect the presence of both individual and collective misconduct and institutionalised harm, highlighting the pervasiveness of these issues. Significant change in sport relies on effective reporting processes, where people at all levels of sport can call out behaviour that breaches boundaries and puts people at risk. Yet, an expectation or particularly the obligation to speak up4 creates a persistent tension: people do not always feel safe enough to do so. Speaking up can include raising concerns about issues such as safety, well-being or conduct, often occurring informally, while whistleblowing is the process of formally reporting serious wrongdoing, unethical behaviour, severe harm or unsafe behaviours, typically through official channels, often when other routes have failed.5 Too often, “speaking up” is framed exclusively as something athletes must do, but welfare is not an athlete-only issue, and all support staff have a responsibility in this sphere.6 Across sport, support staff, including physiotherapists, psychologists and performance scientists, often described as the athlete entourage,3 frequently find themselves in ethically complex situations, where challenging decisions or questioning authority can feel personally and professionally …","PeriodicalId":9276,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safe sport, whistleblowing and contextual learning: truly safe to speak up?\",\"authors\":\"Sian Knott (Harries), Colin Paterson, E Kavanagh\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bjsports-2025-110457\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Few issues pose a more urgent threat to athlete health and well-being than the ongoing crisis of abuse in sport.1 There has been growing awareness of the types, prevalence and risk factors of abuse, articulated most recently in the International Olympic Committee (IOC) consensus statement on interpersonal violence and safeguarding in sport,2 alongside broader questions concerning persistent integrity breaches across all levels of sport.3 Recently, global media headlines too often reflect the presence of both individual and collective misconduct and institutionalised harm, highlighting the pervasiveness of these issues. Significant change in sport relies on effective reporting processes, where people at all levels of sport can call out behaviour that breaches boundaries and puts people at risk. Yet, an expectation or particularly the obligation to speak up4 creates a persistent tension: people do not always feel safe enough to do so. Speaking up can include raising concerns about issues such as safety, well-being or conduct, often occurring informally, while whistleblowing is the process of formally reporting serious wrongdoing, unethical behaviour, severe harm or unsafe behaviours, typically through official channels, often when other routes have failed.5 Too often, “speaking up” is framed exclusively as something athletes must do, but welfare is not an athlete-only issue, and all support staff have a responsibility in this sphere.6 Across sport, support staff, including physiotherapists, psychologists and performance scientists, often described as the athlete entourage,3 frequently find themselves in ethically complex situations, where challenging decisions or questioning authority can feel personally and professionally …\",\"PeriodicalId\":9276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2025-110457\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2025-110457","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Safe sport, whistleblowing and contextual learning: truly safe to speak up?
Few issues pose a more urgent threat to athlete health and well-being than the ongoing crisis of abuse in sport.1 There has been growing awareness of the types, prevalence and risk factors of abuse, articulated most recently in the International Olympic Committee (IOC) consensus statement on interpersonal violence and safeguarding in sport,2 alongside broader questions concerning persistent integrity breaches across all levels of sport.3 Recently, global media headlines too often reflect the presence of both individual and collective misconduct and institutionalised harm, highlighting the pervasiveness of these issues. Significant change in sport relies on effective reporting processes, where people at all levels of sport can call out behaviour that breaches boundaries and puts people at risk. Yet, an expectation or particularly the obligation to speak up4 creates a persistent tension: people do not always feel safe enough to do so. Speaking up can include raising concerns about issues such as safety, well-being or conduct, often occurring informally, while whistleblowing is the process of formally reporting serious wrongdoing, unethical behaviour, severe harm or unsafe behaviours, typically through official channels, often when other routes have failed.5 Too often, “speaking up” is framed exclusively as something athletes must do, but welfare is not an athlete-only issue, and all support staff have a responsibility in this sphere.6 Across sport, support staff, including physiotherapists, psychologists and performance scientists, often described as the athlete entourage,3 frequently find themselves in ethically complex situations, where challenging decisions or questioning authority can feel personally and professionally …
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of Sports Medicine (BJSM) is a dynamic platform that presents groundbreaking research, thought-provoking reviews, and meaningful discussions on sport and exercise medicine. Our focus encompasses various clinically-relevant aspects such as physiotherapy, physical therapy, and rehabilitation. With an aim to foster innovation, education, and knowledge translation, we strive to bridge the gap between research and practical implementation in the field. Our multi-media approach, including web, print, video, and audio resources, along with our active presence on social media, connects a global community of healthcare professionals dedicated to treating active individuals.