院前流动急救服务的护理监督。

Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P Pub Date : 2025-07-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2024-0238en
Camila Galiano, André Almeida de Moura, Josué Souza Gleriano, Vivian Aline Mininel, Mayra de Cássia Trovó, Mariana Fraga de Figueiredo, Bethania Ferreira Goulart, Lucieli Dias Pedreschi Chaves
{"title":"院前流动急救服务的护理监督。","authors":"Camila Galiano, André Almeida de Moura, Josué Souza Gleriano, Vivian Aline Mininel, Mayra de Cássia Trovó, Mariana Fraga de Figueiredo, Bethania Ferreira Goulart, Lucieli Dias Pedreschi Chaves","doi":"10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2024-0238en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze limitations and potentialities of nursing supervision, according to the nursing team, of a Mobile Emergency Care Service.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Descriptive research, with a qualitative approach, using the Critical Incident Technique. Nurses and nursing technicians participated. Data were collected in a semi-structured, individual, recorded interview, later transcribed, followed by the grouping and categorization of Critical Incidents, using Bardin's content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-seven critical incidents emerged from the interviews, 22% received positive and 78% negative references, indicating a predominance of factors that limit supervision. These factors were categorized into \"Singularities of nursing supervision\", \"Organizational conditions\", \"People management\", and \"Vacancy regulation\".</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Enhancing factors: institutional support, education as a supervision tool, team meetings, timely feedback and participatory management; limiting factors: indirect nursing supervision (nurse and technicians in different teams), lack of materials and maintenance and of institutional support, nurse work overload, conflicts, and lack of communication.</p>","PeriodicalId":94195,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P","volume":"59 ","pages":"e20240238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12244992/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nursing supervision in the mobile pre-hospital emergency care service.\",\"authors\":\"Camila Galiano, André Almeida de Moura, Josué Souza Gleriano, Vivian Aline Mininel, Mayra de Cássia Trovó, Mariana Fraga de Figueiredo, Bethania Ferreira Goulart, Lucieli Dias Pedreschi Chaves\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2024-0238en\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze limitations and potentialities of nursing supervision, according to the nursing team, of a Mobile Emergency Care Service.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Descriptive research, with a qualitative approach, using the Critical Incident Technique. Nurses and nursing technicians participated. Data were collected in a semi-structured, individual, recorded interview, later transcribed, followed by the grouping and categorization of Critical Incidents, using Bardin's content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-seven critical incidents emerged from the interviews, 22% received positive and 78% negative references, indicating a predominance of factors that limit supervision. These factors were categorized into \\\"Singularities of nursing supervision\\\", \\\"Organizational conditions\\\", \\\"People management\\\", and \\\"Vacancy regulation\\\".</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Enhancing factors: institutional support, education as a supervision tool, team meetings, timely feedback and participatory management; limiting factors: indirect nursing supervision (nurse and technicians in different teams), lack of materials and maintenance and of institutional support, nurse work overload, conflicts, and lack of communication.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P\",\"volume\":\"59 \",\"pages\":\"e20240238\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12244992/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2024-0238en\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2024-0238en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:分析某流动急救服务队护理监督的局限性和潜力。方法:采用关键事件技术,采用定性方法进行描述性研究。护士和护理技术人员参与。数据是在半结构化的、个人的、记录的访谈中收集的,随后进行转录,然后使用Bardin的内容分析对关键事件进行分组和分类。结果:访谈中出现了77起关键事件,22%的人得到了正面评价,78%的人得到了负面评价,表明限制监督的因素占主导地位。这些因素分为“护理监管的独特性”、“组织条件”、“人员管理”和“职位空缺调节”。结论:促进因素:制度支持、教育作为监督工具、团队会议、及时反馈和参与式管理;限制因素:间接护理监督(护士和技术人员在不同的团队),缺乏材料和维护和机构支持,护士工作超载,冲突和缺乏沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nursing supervision in the mobile pre-hospital emergency care service.

Objective: To analyze limitations and potentialities of nursing supervision, according to the nursing team, of a Mobile Emergency Care Service.

Method: Descriptive research, with a qualitative approach, using the Critical Incident Technique. Nurses and nursing technicians participated. Data were collected in a semi-structured, individual, recorded interview, later transcribed, followed by the grouping and categorization of Critical Incidents, using Bardin's content analysis.

Results: Seventy-seven critical incidents emerged from the interviews, 22% received positive and 78% negative references, indicating a predominance of factors that limit supervision. These factors were categorized into "Singularities of nursing supervision", "Organizational conditions", "People management", and "Vacancy regulation".

Conclusion: Enhancing factors: institutional support, education as a supervision tool, team meetings, timely feedback and participatory management; limiting factors: indirect nursing supervision (nurse and technicians in different teams), lack of materials and maintenance and of institutional support, nurse work overload, conflicts, and lack of communication.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信