社区药房非专利药品的定价和报销。

David Epstein
{"title":"社区药房非专利药品的定价和报销。","authors":"David Epstein","doi":"10.1016/j.gaceta.2025.102506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>After expiry of the patent, price competition can lead to savings. However, in Spain, competition in the retail price of prescription off-patent medicines in pharmacies is rare, while large discounts are negotiated in the wholesale market. Some countries have moved from \"competition by discount\" to \"competition by price\". This article compares retail prices in Spain with other countries, and the factors that promote price competition.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This article reviews the literature comparing prices and the factors influencing competition. A detailed analysis of the design of the market was conducted for Spain and Sweden. Interviews were conducted with experts. The systems were compared for the definition of exchange groups, prescription and substitution, how retail prices and profit margins are regulated, and safeguards to avoid risk of shortages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Depending on sample and methodology, prices in Spain may be on average 51% to 109% greater than Sweden. Broadly, the literature recommends that the off-patent market should be regulated by competitive forces rather than price caps. Spain and Sweden have many features in common. Key differences are: 1) Sweden allows price differences between medicines, and for prices to rise as well as fall, 2) the tendering process, 3) patient choice, and 4) the architecture of the exchange groups CONCLUSIONS: In Spain, first generic or biosimilar entry provokes a 25-40% discount, but thereafter prices are static. In Sweden, price competition is dynamic. This includes, within limits, freedom to set prices, product differentiation, and patient choice.</p>","PeriodicalId":94017,"journal":{"name":"Gaceta sanitaria","volume":" ","pages":"102506"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pricing and reimbursement of off-patent medicines dispensed in community pharmacies.\",\"authors\":\"David Epstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gaceta.2025.102506\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>After expiry of the patent, price competition can lead to savings. However, in Spain, competition in the retail price of prescription off-patent medicines in pharmacies is rare, while large discounts are negotiated in the wholesale market. Some countries have moved from \\\"competition by discount\\\" to \\\"competition by price\\\". This article compares retail prices in Spain with other countries, and the factors that promote price competition.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This article reviews the literature comparing prices and the factors influencing competition. A detailed analysis of the design of the market was conducted for Spain and Sweden. Interviews were conducted with experts. The systems were compared for the definition of exchange groups, prescription and substitution, how retail prices and profit margins are regulated, and safeguards to avoid risk of shortages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Depending on sample and methodology, prices in Spain may be on average 51% to 109% greater than Sweden. Broadly, the literature recommends that the off-patent market should be regulated by competitive forces rather than price caps. Spain and Sweden have many features in common. Key differences are: 1) Sweden allows price differences between medicines, and for prices to rise as well as fall, 2) the tendering process, 3) patient choice, and 4) the architecture of the exchange groups CONCLUSIONS: In Spain, first generic or biosimilar entry provokes a 25-40% discount, but thereafter prices are static. In Sweden, price competition is dynamic. This includes, within limits, freedom to set prices, product differentiation, and patient choice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gaceta sanitaria\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"102506\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gaceta sanitaria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2025.102506\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gaceta sanitaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2025.102506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:专利期满后,价格竞争可以节约成本。然而,在西班牙,药店处方非专利药品的零售价格竞争很少,而批发市场上的大幅折扣是通过谈判达成的。一些国家已经从“折扣竞争”转向“价格竞争”。本文比较了西班牙与其他国家的零售价格,以及促进价格竞争的因素。方法:查阅文献,比较价格和竞争影响因素。对西班牙和瑞典的市场设计进行了详细分析。对专家进行了采访。对这两种制度进行了比较,包括对交换集团的定义、处方和替代、如何监管零售价格和利润率,以及避免短缺风险的保障措施。结果:根据样本和方法的不同,西班牙的价格可能比瑞典平均高出51%至109%。总的来说,文献建议非专利市场应该由竞争力量而不是价格上限来调节。西班牙和瑞典有许多共同之处。关键的区别在于:1)瑞典允许药品之间的价格差异,并允许价格上涨或下跌;2)招标过程;3)患者选择;4)交换组的结构。结论:在西班牙,首次仿制药或生物仿制药进入可获得25-40%的折扣,但此后价格是不变的。在瑞典,价格竞争是动态的。在一定范围内,这包括定价、产品差异化和患者选择的自由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pricing and reimbursement of off-patent medicines dispensed in community pharmacies.

Objective: After expiry of the patent, price competition can lead to savings. However, in Spain, competition in the retail price of prescription off-patent medicines in pharmacies is rare, while large discounts are negotiated in the wholesale market. Some countries have moved from "competition by discount" to "competition by price". This article compares retail prices in Spain with other countries, and the factors that promote price competition.

Method: This article reviews the literature comparing prices and the factors influencing competition. A detailed analysis of the design of the market was conducted for Spain and Sweden. Interviews were conducted with experts. The systems were compared for the definition of exchange groups, prescription and substitution, how retail prices and profit margins are regulated, and safeguards to avoid risk of shortages.

Results: Depending on sample and methodology, prices in Spain may be on average 51% to 109% greater than Sweden. Broadly, the literature recommends that the off-patent market should be regulated by competitive forces rather than price caps. Spain and Sweden have many features in common. Key differences are: 1) Sweden allows price differences between medicines, and for prices to rise as well as fall, 2) the tendering process, 3) patient choice, and 4) the architecture of the exchange groups CONCLUSIONS: In Spain, first generic or biosimilar entry provokes a 25-40% discount, but thereafter prices are static. In Sweden, price competition is dynamic. This includes, within limits, freedom to set prices, product differentiation, and patient choice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信