创伤性脑损伤气管切开术患者综合护理与呼吸预后的关系。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2025-07-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S516115
Xi-Juan Gu, Yan Le, Xiao-Mei Hu, Zhi-Hui Lu
{"title":"创伤性脑损伤气管切开术患者综合护理与呼吸预后的关系。","authors":"Xi-Juan Gu, Yan Le, Xiao-Mei Hu, Zhi-Hui Lu","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S516115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the application of comprehensive nursing in patients undergoing tracheostomy after traumatic brain injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 87 patients with traumatic brain injury who underwent tracheostomy in our hospital, divided into a control group (n=43), which received standard nursing care, and an intervention group (n=44), which received comprehensive nursing care. The intervention effects of the two groups were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The perioperative indicators in the intervention group were lower than those in the control group. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) levels in the intervention group decreased 2 weeks after surgery, while peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>) levels in the control group increased 2 weeks after surgery; the daily sputum volume in the intervention group was higher than that in the control group, and the suction frequency and duration were lower in the intervention group than in the control group; Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score was higher and Neurological Deficit Scale (CSS) score, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score were lower in the intervention group than in the control group after intervention; the incidence of complications in the intervention group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Comprehensive nursing for patients undergoing tracheostomy after traumatic brain injury can promote patient recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"2287-2296"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12241660/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of Comprehensive Nursing with Respiratory Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Tracheostomy After Traumatic Brain Injury.\",\"authors\":\"Xi-Juan Gu, Yan Le, Xiao-Mei Hu, Zhi-Hui Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/RMHP.S516115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the application of comprehensive nursing in patients undergoing tracheostomy after traumatic brain injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 87 patients with traumatic brain injury who underwent tracheostomy in our hospital, divided into a control group (n=43), which received standard nursing care, and an intervention group (n=44), which received comprehensive nursing care. The intervention effects of the two groups were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The perioperative indicators in the intervention group were lower than those in the control group. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) levels in the intervention group decreased 2 weeks after surgery, while peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>) levels in the control group increased 2 weeks after surgery; the daily sputum volume in the intervention group was higher than that in the control group, and the suction frequency and duration were lower in the intervention group than in the control group; Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score was higher and Neurological Deficit Scale (CSS) score, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score were lower in the intervention group than in the control group after intervention; the incidence of complications in the intervention group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Comprehensive nursing for patients undergoing tracheostomy after traumatic brain injury can promote patient recovery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"2287-2296\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12241660/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S516115\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S516115","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:分析综合护理在颅脑外伤气管切开术中的应用。方法:回顾性分析我院行气管切开术的87例外伤性脑损伤患者,分为对照组(n=43)和干预组(n=44),分别给予标准护理和综合护理。比较两组的干预效果。结果:干预组围手术期各项指标均低于对照组。干预组患者术后2周收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)水平下降,对照组患者术后2周外周血管血氧饱和度(SpO2)水平升高;干预组患者日吸痰量高于对照组,吸痰次数和持续时间均低于对照组;干预后,干预组患者格拉斯哥结局量表(GOS)评分高于对照组,神经功能缺损量表(CSS)评分、急性生理与慢性健康评估II (APACHE II)评分和视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分低于对照组;干预组并发症发生率低于对照组(结论:颅脑外伤气管切开术患者的综合护理可促进患者康复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association of Comprehensive Nursing with Respiratory Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Tracheostomy After Traumatic Brain Injury.

Objective: To analyze the application of comprehensive nursing in patients undergoing tracheostomy after traumatic brain injury.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 87 patients with traumatic brain injury who underwent tracheostomy in our hospital, divided into a control group (n=43), which received standard nursing care, and an intervention group (n=44), which received comprehensive nursing care. The intervention effects of the two groups were compared.

Results: The perioperative indicators in the intervention group were lower than those in the control group. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) levels in the intervention group decreased 2 weeks after surgery, while peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2) levels in the control group increased 2 weeks after surgery; the daily sputum volume in the intervention group was higher than that in the control group, and the suction frequency and duration were lower in the intervention group than in the control group; Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score was higher and Neurological Deficit Scale (CSS) score, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score were lower in the intervention group than in the control group after intervention; the incidence of complications in the intervention group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05).

Conclusion: Comprehensive nursing for patients undergoing tracheostomy after traumatic brain injury can promote patient recovery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信