采用基于二维超声成像的乳腺癌瘤内和瘤周放射组学来确定预测KI-67表达的最佳瘤周范围。

IF 1.4 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Journal of Ultrasound Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-10 DOI:10.1007/s40477-025-01049-0
Wangxing Huang, Songming Zheng, Xiaoyan Zhang, Lina Qi, Min Li, Qinghua Zhang, Zhen Zhen, Xiuwei Yang, Changqin Kong, Dong Li, Guoyong Hua
{"title":"采用基于二维超声成像的乳腺癌瘤内和瘤周放射组学来确定预测KI-67表达的最佳瘤周范围。","authors":"Wangxing Huang, Songming Zheng, Xiaoyan Zhang, Lina Qi, Min Li, Qinghua Zhang, Zhen Zhen, Xiuwei Yang, Changqin Kong, Dong Li, Guoyong Hua","doi":"10.1007/s40477-025-01049-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Currently, radiomics focuses on intratumoral regions and fixed peritumoral regions, and lacks an optimal peritumoral region taken to predict KI-67 expression. The aim of this study was to develop a machine learning model to analyze ultrasound radiomics features with different regions of peri-tumor fetch values to determine the optimal peri-tumor region for predicting KI-67 expression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 453 breast cancer patients were included. They were randomly assigned to training and validation sets in a 7:3 ratio. In the training cohort, machine learning models were constructed for intra-tumor and different peri-tumor regions (2 mm, 4 mm, 6 mm, 8 mm, 10 mm), identifying the relevant Ki-67 features for each ROI and comparing the different models to determine the best model. These models were validated using a test cohort to find the most accurate peri-tumor region for Ki-67 prediction. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the performance of predicting KI-67 expression, and the Delong test was used to assess the difference between each AUC.SHAP (Shapley Additive Decomposition) was performed to analyze the optimal prediction model and quantify the contribution of major radiomics features.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the validation cohort, the SVM model with the combination of intratumoral and peritumoral 6 mm regions showed the highest prediction effect, with an AUC of 0.9342.The intratumoral and peritumoral 6-mm SVM models showed statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) compared to the other models. SHAP analysis showed that peri-tumoral 6 mm features were more important than intratumoral features.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SVM models using intratumoral and peritumoral 6 mm regions showed the best results in prediction of KI-67 expression.</p>","PeriodicalId":51528,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound","volume":" ","pages":"709-717"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12496391/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics based on 2D ultrasound imaging in breast cancer was used to determine the optimal peritumoral range for predicting KI-67 expression.\",\"authors\":\"Wangxing Huang, Songming Zheng, Xiaoyan Zhang, Lina Qi, Min Li, Qinghua Zhang, Zhen Zhen, Xiuwei Yang, Changqin Kong, Dong Li, Guoyong Hua\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40477-025-01049-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Currently, radiomics focuses on intratumoral regions and fixed peritumoral regions, and lacks an optimal peritumoral region taken to predict KI-67 expression. The aim of this study was to develop a machine learning model to analyze ultrasound radiomics features with different regions of peri-tumor fetch values to determine the optimal peri-tumor region for predicting KI-67 expression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 453 breast cancer patients were included. They were randomly assigned to training and validation sets in a 7:3 ratio. In the training cohort, machine learning models were constructed for intra-tumor and different peri-tumor regions (2 mm, 4 mm, 6 mm, 8 mm, 10 mm), identifying the relevant Ki-67 features for each ROI and comparing the different models to determine the best model. These models were validated using a test cohort to find the most accurate peri-tumor region for Ki-67 prediction. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the performance of predicting KI-67 expression, and the Delong test was used to assess the difference between each AUC.SHAP (Shapley Additive Decomposition) was performed to analyze the optimal prediction model and quantify the contribution of major radiomics features.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the validation cohort, the SVM model with the combination of intratumoral and peritumoral 6 mm regions showed the highest prediction effect, with an AUC of 0.9342.The intratumoral and peritumoral 6-mm SVM models showed statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) compared to the other models. SHAP analysis showed that peri-tumoral 6 mm features were more important than intratumoral features.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SVM models using intratumoral and peritumoral 6 mm regions showed the best results in prediction of KI-67 expression.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ultrasound\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"709-717\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12496391/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ultrasound\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-025-01049-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-025-01049-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:目前,放射组学主要集中在肿瘤内区域和固定的肿瘤周围区域,缺乏预测KI-67表达的最佳肿瘤周围区域。本研究的目的是建立一个机器学习模型来分析不同肿瘤周围区域的超声放射组学特征,以确定预测KI-67表达的最佳肿瘤周围区域。方法:共纳入453例乳腺癌患者。他们以7:3的比例随机分配到训练集和验证集。在训练队列中,针对肿瘤内和肿瘤周围不同区域(2mm, 4mm, 6mm, 8mm, 10mm)构建机器学习模型,识别每个ROI的相关Ki-67特征,并比较不同模型以确定最佳模型。这些模型通过测试队列进行验证,以找到最准确的Ki-67预测肿瘤周围区域。采用受试者工作特征曲线(receiver operating characteristic curve, AUC)下面积评价KI-67表达预测能力,采用Delong检验法评价各AUC之间的差异。采用Shapley加性分解(Shapley Additive Decomposition)分析最优预测模型并量化主要放射组学特征的贡献。结果:在验证队列中,肿瘤内和肿瘤周围6 mm区域相结合的SVM模型预测效果最好,AUC为0.9342。结论:瘤内和瘤周6mm支持向量机模型预测KI-67表达的效果最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics based on 2D ultrasound imaging in breast cancer was used to determine the optimal peritumoral range for predicting KI-67 expression.

Intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics based on 2D ultrasound imaging in breast cancer was used to determine the optimal peritumoral range for predicting KI-67 expression.

Intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics based on 2D ultrasound imaging in breast cancer was used to determine the optimal peritumoral range for predicting KI-67 expression.

Intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics based on 2D ultrasound imaging in breast cancer was used to determine the optimal peritumoral range for predicting KI-67 expression.

Objectives: Currently, radiomics focuses on intratumoral regions and fixed peritumoral regions, and lacks an optimal peritumoral region taken to predict KI-67 expression. The aim of this study was to develop a machine learning model to analyze ultrasound radiomics features with different regions of peri-tumor fetch values to determine the optimal peri-tumor region for predicting KI-67 expression.

Methods: A total of 453 breast cancer patients were included. They were randomly assigned to training and validation sets in a 7:3 ratio. In the training cohort, machine learning models were constructed for intra-tumor and different peri-tumor regions (2 mm, 4 mm, 6 mm, 8 mm, 10 mm), identifying the relevant Ki-67 features for each ROI and comparing the different models to determine the best model. These models were validated using a test cohort to find the most accurate peri-tumor region for Ki-67 prediction. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the performance of predicting KI-67 expression, and the Delong test was used to assess the difference between each AUC.SHAP (Shapley Additive Decomposition) was performed to analyze the optimal prediction model and quantify the contribution of major radiomics features.

Results: In the validation cohort, the SVM model with the combination of intratumoral and peritumoral 6 mm regions showed the highest prediction effect, with an AUC of 0.9342.The intratumoral and peritumoral 6-mm SVM models showed statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) compared to the other models. SHAP analysis showed that peri-tumoral 6 mm features were more important than intratumoral features.

Conclusion: SVM models using intratumoral and peritumoral 6 mm regions showed the best results in prediction of KI-67 expression.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Ultrasound
Journal of Ultrasound RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
15.00%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ultrasound is the official journal of the Italian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (SIUMB). The journal publishes original contributions (research and review articles, case reports, technical reports and letters to the editor) on significant advances in clinical diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic applications, clinical techniques, the physics, engineering and technology of ultrasound in medicine and biology, and in cross-sectional diagnostic imaging. The official language of Journal of Ultrasound is English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信