重新分配糖尿病相关垃圾代码以提高死亡率估算:以潍坊为例

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Xiao Zhang, Wenyi Yang, Jingxin Wang, Limei Ai, Min Chen, Chunping Wang, Xia Wan
{"title":"重新分配糖尿病相关垃圾代码以提高死亡率估算:以潍坊为例","authors":"Xiao Zhang, Wenyi Yang, Jingxin Wang, Limei Ai, Min Chen, Chunping Wang, Xia Wan","doi":"10.1186/s12963-025-00399-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Effective identification and correction of diabetes mellitus (DM)-related garbage codes (GCs) in mortality surveillance data is crucial for accurately estimating regional DM mortality rates. This study applied a structured, three-step approach-using standard WHO ICD-10 mortality coding rules, coarsened exact matching (CEMM), and fixed proportion reassignment (FPRM)-to redistribute diabetes-related GCs in Weifang's mortality data (2010-2022). Using ICD-10 coding rules, we reclassified 29 deaths originally assigned to DM as the underlying cause of death (UCD) to other causes, and reassigned 1,945 records previously not attributed to DM to DM as the UCD. CEMM then reclassified 283 DM-related GC records to DM, followed by FPRM, which reassigned 160 \"unknown cause\" records to DM. Together, these steps increased the number of DM deaths by 22.82%. Based on the reallocated data, crude DM mortality rates rose from 7.64 to 17.75 per 100,000 between 2010 and 2022, with males experiencing a greater overall increase than females. While no new algorithms were developed, this study demonstrates how internationally recommended coding standards-often neglected in routine subnational settings-can be systematically and rigorously applied to improve DM mortality surveillance. This work highlights operational gaps in local death certification and presents a replicable protocol for enhancing mortality data reliability using existing tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":51476,"journal":{"name":"Population Health Metrics","volume":"23 1","pages":"38"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12247368/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reallocating diabetes-related garbage codes to improve mortality estimates: a case study in Weifang, China.\",\"authors\":\"Xiao Zhang, Wenyi Yang, Jingxin Wang, Limei Ai, Min Chen, Chunping Wang, Xia Wan\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12963-025-00399-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Effective identification and correction of diabetes mellitus (DM)-related garbage codes (GCs) in mortality surveillance data is crucial for accurately estimating regional DM mortality rates. This study applied a structured, three-step approach-using standard WHO ICD-10 mortality coding rules, coarsened exact matching (CEMM), and fixed proportion reassignment (FPRM)-to redistribute diabetes-related GCs in Weifang's mortality data (2010-2022). Using ICD-10 coding rules, we reclassified 29 deaths originally assigned to DM as the underlying cause of death (UCD) to other causes, and reassigned 1,945 records previously not attributed to DM to DM as the UCD. CEMM then reclassified 283 DM-related GC records to DM, followed by FPRM, which reassigned 160 \\\"unknown cause\\\" records to DM. Together, these steps increased the number of DM deaths by 22.82%. Based on the reallocated data, crude DM mortality rates rose from 7.64 to 17.75 per 100,000 between 2010 and 2022, with males experiencing a greater overall increase than females. While no new algorithms were developed, this study demonstrates how internationally recommended coding standards-often neglected in routine subnational settings-can be systematically and rigorously applied to improve DM mortality surveillance. This work highlights operational gaps in local death certification and presents a replicable protocol for enhancing mortality data reliability using existing tools.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Population Health Metrics\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12247368/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Population Health Metrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12963-025-00399-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Health Metrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12963-025-00399-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有效识别和纠正死亡监测数据中的糖尿病相关垃圾码(GCs)对于准确估计区域糖尿病死亡率至关重要。本研究采用结构化的三步方法-使用标准WHO ICD-10死亡率编码规则,粗化精确匹配(CEMM)和固定比例重新分配(FPRM)-重新分配潍坊市2010-2022年死亡率数据中的糖尿病相关gc。使用ICD-10编码规则,我们将原来属于糖尿病的29例死亡重新归类为其他原因的潜在死亡(UCD),并将以前不属于糖尿病的1945例记录重新归类为糖尿病作为UCD。随后,CEMM将283例DM相关的GC记录重新分类为DM, FPRM将160例“未知原因”记录重新分类为DM。这些步骤使DM死亡人数增加了22.82%。根据重新分配的数据,2010年至2022年期间,糖尿病的粗死亡率从每10万人7.64人上升到17.75人,男性的总体增幅大于女性。虽然没有开发新的算法,但这项研究表明,如何系统和严格地应用国际推荐的编码标准(在常规的次国家级环境中经常被忽视)来改善糖尿病死亡率监测。这项工作突出了当地死亡证明方面的业务差距,并提出了一项可复制的协议,以利用现有工具提高死亡率数据的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Reallocating diabetes-related garbage codes to improve mortality estimates: a case study in Weifang, China.

Reallocating diabetes-related garbage codes to improve mortality estimates: a case study in Weifang, China.

Reallocating diabetes-related garbage codes to improve mortality estimates: a case study in Weifang, China.

Effective identification and correction of diabetes mellitus (DM)-related garbage codes (GCs) in mortality surveillance data is crucial for accurately estimating regional DM mortality rates. This study applied a structured, three-step approach-using standard WHO ICD-10 mortality coding rules, coarsened exact matching (CEMM), and fixed proportion reassignment (FPRM)-to redistribute diabetes-related GCs in Weifang's mortality data (2010-2022). Using ICD-10 coding rules, we reclassified 29 deaths originally assigned to DM as the underlying cause of death (UCD) to other causes, and reassigned 1,945 records previously not attributed to DM to DM as the UCD. CEMM then reclassified 283 DM-related GC records to DM, followed by FPRM, which reassigned 160 "unknown cause" records to DM. Together, these steps increased the number of DM deaths by 22.82%. Based on the reallocated data, crude DM mortality rates rose from 7.64 to 17.75 per 100,000 between 2010 and 2022, with males experiencing a greater overall increase than females. While no new algorithms were developed, this study demonstrates how internationally recommended coding standards-often neglected in routine subnational settings-can be systematically and rigorously applied to improve DM mortality surveillance. This work highlights operational gaps in local death certification and presents a replicable protocol for enhancing mortality data reliability using existing tools.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Population Health Metrics
Population Health Metrics PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: Population Health Metrics aims to advance the science of population health assessment, and welcomes papers relating to concepts, methods, ethics, applications, and summary measures of population health. The journal provides a unique platform for population health researchers to share their findings with the global community. We seek research that addresses the communication of population health measures and policy implications to stakeholders; this includes papers related to burden estimation and risk assessment, and research addressing population health across the full range of development. Population Health Metrics covers a broad range of topics encompassing health state measurement and valuation, summary measures of population health, descriptive epidemiology at the population level, burden of disease and injury analysis, disease and risk factor modeling for populations, and comparative assessment of risks to health at the population level. The journal is also interested in how to use and communicate indicators of population health to reduce disease burden, and the approaches for translating from indicators of population health to health-advancing actions. As a cross-cutting topic of importance, we are particularly interested in inequalities in population health and their measurement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信