{"title":"教学同伴观察:创新扩散理论指导下的多点案例研究。","authors":"Arone Wondwossen Fantaye, Janet Alexanian, Ruth Chen, Cora McCloy, Heather Lochnan, Megan Burnett, Karen Leslie, Teresa Chan, Natalia Danilovich, Paul Hendry, Simon Kitto","doi":"10.1007/s10459-025-10456-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is limited evidence and understanding of the factors that promote the successful Peer Observation of Teaching (POT) implementation and long-term sustainability. The purpose of this multi-site study is to examine how Canadian universities implement a POT innovation and what factors influence its implementation and sustainability. This study employed a cross-comparative case study design of two Canadian universities guided by the Diffusion of Innovations (DOI) Theory. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with administrators and faculty who had experience providing or receiving peer observation. Public records relevant to POT innovation implementation and operationalisation were also collected. A qualitative content analysis, using a combination of directed and open coding, was conducted with both sets of data from the two sites. Factors affecting the implementation of POT: the promotion of POT teaching and the availability of resources and supports were insufficient in ensuring adoption in departments where POT was not compatible with demands, routines, and departmental culture. Specifically, the POT innovation was successfully implemented and sustained in two non-medicine departments where it fit with pre-existing professional culture and routines. In contrast, in departments of medicine, where teaching and peer feedback were undervalued, POT was perceived as burdensome and unimportant. Interviews with clinical teachers from medicine and allied health professions suggest the existence of a \"hidden curriculum\" that may act in contradiction to the principles of a POT innovation. Our findings suggest that while it is important to promote teaching excellence and faculty development, the sustainability and effectiveness of a teaching innovation to this end may require attention to the specific departmental context in which it is employed. Compatibility with routines, time constraints, norms, and culture is important in ensuring an innovation's sustainability.</p>","PeriodicalId":50959,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peer observation of teaching: multiple-site case study guided by diffusion of innovations theory.\",\"authors\":\"Arone Wondwossen Fantaye, Janet Alexanian, Ruth Chen, Cora McCloy, Heather Lochnan, Megan Burnett, Karen Leslie, Teresa Chan, Natalia Danilovich, Paul Hendry, Simon Kitto\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10459-025-10456-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There is limited evidence and understanding of the factors that promote the successful Peer Observation of Teaching (POT) implementation and long-term sustainability. The purpose of this multi-site study is to examine how Canadian universities implement a POT innovation and what factors influence its implementation and sustainability. This study employed a cross-comparative case study design of two Canadian universities guided by the Diffusion of Innovations (DOI) Theory. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with administrators and faculty who had experience providing or receiving peer observation. Public records relevant to POT innovation implementation and operationalisation were also collected. A qualitative content analysis, using a combination of directed and open coding, was conducted with both sets of data from the two sites. Factors affecting the implementation of POT: the promotion of POT teaching and the availability of resources and supports were insufficient in ensuring adoption in departments where POT was not compatible with demands, routines, and departmental culture. Specifically, the POT innovation was successfully implemented and sustained in two non-medicine departments where it fit with pre-existing professional culture and routines. In contrast, in departments of medicine, where teaching and peer feedback were undervalued, POT was perceived as burdensome and unimportant. Interviews with clinical teachers from medicine and allied health professions suggest the existence of a \\\"hidden curriculum\\\" that may act in contradiction to the principles of a POT innovation. Our findings suggest that while it is important to promote teaching excellence and faculty development, the sustainability and effectiveness of a teaching innovation to this end may require attention to the specific departmental context in which it is employed. Compatibility with routines, time constraints, norms, and culture is important in ensuring an innovation's sustainability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Health Sciences Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Health Sciences Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-025-10456-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-025-10456-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Peer observation of teaching: multiple-site case study guided by diffusion of innovations theory.
There is limited evidence and understanding of the factors that promote the successful Peer Observation of Teaching (POT) implementation and long-term sustainability. The purpose of this multi-site study is to examine how Canadian universities implement a POT innovation and what factors influence its implementation and sustainability. This study employed a cross-comparative case study design of two Canadian universities guided by the Diffusion of Innovations (DOI) Theory. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with administrators and faculty who had experience providing or receiving peer observation. Public records relevant to POT innovation implementation and operationalisation were also collected. A qualitative content analysis, using a combination of directed and open coding, was conducted with both sets of data from the two sites. Factors affecting the implementation of POT: the promotion of POT teaching and the availability of resources and supports were insufficient in ensuring adoption in departments where POT was not compatible with demands, routines, and departmental culture. Specifically, the POT innovation was successfully implemented and sustained in two non-medicine departments where it fit with pre-existing professional culture and routines. In contrast, in departments of medicine, where teaching and peer feedback were undervalued, POT was perceived as burdensome and unimportant. Interviews with clinical teachers from medicine and allied health professions suggest the existence of a "hidden curriculum" that may act in contradiction to the principles of a POT innovation. Our findings suggest that while it is important to promote teaching excellence and faculty development, the sustainability and effectiveness of a teaching innovation to this end may require attention to the specific departmental context in which it is employed. Compatibility with routines, time constraints, norms, and culture is important in ensuring an innovation's sustainability.
期刊介绍:
Advances in Health Sciences Education is a forum for scholarly and state-of-the art research into all aspects of health sciences education. It will publish empirical studies as well as discussions of theoretical issues and practical implications. The primary focus of the Journal is linking theory to practice, thus priority will be given to papers that have a sound theoretical basis and strong methodology.