年龄和思维模式对儿童正弦谐波加速度测试的影响。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Nour El-Hidek, Jessie N Patterson, Manuel Vicente, Karen Hendrick, Kristen L Janky
{"title":"年龄和思维模式对儿童正弦谐波加速度测试的影响。","authors":"Nour El-Hidek, Jessie N Patterson, Manuel Vicente, Karen Hendrick, Kristen L Janky","doi":"10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to examine the effect of age and several methodological alterations such as position (parent lap vs. car seat), calibration strategy (standard vs. default), and illuminance on sinusoidal harmonic acceleration (SHA) outcomes in children aged 6 months to 5 years.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Fifty-two healthy children, aged 6 months to 5 years, and 23 healthy adults, aged 22 to 39 years, participated. To assess the effect of light illuminance on the corneoretinal potential, adults completed SHA at 0.16 Hz immediately, 5 and 10 min after the rotary chair door was closed, and then again after 10 s of light illumination. To assess the effect of position and calibration strategy, adults completed SHA using default and standard calibration in a standard seat and in a forward seat position. In children, SHA was completed at 0.01, 0.04., and 0.16 Hz in a car seat or booster seat and in a parent's lap, if tolerated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Gain decreased with darkness adaptation and significantly increased in response to using a light wand. In the adults, gain was higher regardless of test position using default calibration and significantly lower in forward seat position using standard calibration; however, in the pediatric group, there were no significant differences in outcomes relative to age or position. Overall, children had significantly higher gain, phase, and symmetry when compared to the adults.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SHA testing is feasible using a combination of conditions without significantly affecting interpretation. Pediatric SHA test outcomes were higher compared to those of adults, supporting the need for pediatric normative data.</p>","PeriodicalId":49241,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Age and Paradigm on Pediatric Sinusoidal Harmonic Acceleration Testing.\",\"authors\":\"Nour El-Hidek, Jessie N Patterson, Manuel Vicente, Karen Hendrick, Kristen L Janky\",\"doi\":\"10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to examine the effect of age and several methodological alterations such as position (parent lap vs. car seat), calibration strategy (standard vs. default), and illuminance on sinusoidal harmonic acceleration (SHA) outcomes in children aged 6 months to 5 years.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Fifty-two healthy children, aged 6 months to 5 years, and 23 healthy adults, aged 22 to 39 years, participated. To assess the effect of light illuminance on the corneoretinal potential, adults completed SHA at 0.16 Hz immediately, 5 and 10 min after the rotary chair door was closed, and then again after 10 s of light illumination. To assess the effect of position and calibration strategy, adults completed SHA using default and standard calibration in a standard seat and in a forward seat position. In children, SHA was completed at 0.01, 0.04., and 0.16 Hz in a car seat or booster seat and in a parent's lap, if tolerated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Gain decreased with darkness adaptation and significantly increased in response to using a light wand. In the adults, gain was higher regardless of test position using default calibration and significantly lower in forward seat position using standard calibration; however, in the pediatric group, there were no significant differences in outcomes relative to age or position. Overall, children had significantly higher gain, phase, and symmetry when compared to the adults.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SHA testing is feasible using a combination of conditions without significantly affecting interpretation. Pediatric SHA test outcomes were higher compared to those of adults, supporting the need for pediatric normative data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Audiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00010\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在研究年龄和几种方法改变的影响,如位置(父母膝盖与汽车座椅),校准策略(标准与默认)和照度对6个月至5岁儿童正弦谐波加速度(SHA)结果的影响。方法:选取52名6个月~ 5岁的健康儿童和23名22 ~ 39岁的健康成人作为研究对象。为了评估光照对角膜视网膜电位的影响,成人分别在0.16 Hz下立即、关闭旋转椅门后5分钟和10分钟完成SHA,然后在光照10 s后再次完成SHA。为了评估位置和校准策略的效果,成年人在标准座位和前倾座位上使用默认和标准校准完成了SHA。儿童的SHA分别为0.01、0.04。如果允许的话,在汽车座椅或增高座椅以及父母的膝盖上的频率为0.16 Hz。结果:增益随着黑暗的适应而降低,而使用光棒时增益显著增加。在成年人中,无论使用默认校准的测试位置如何,增益都较高,而使用标准校准的前座位置明显较低;然而,在儿科组中,与年龄或位置相关的结果没有显著差异。总的来说,与成年人相比,儿童的增益、相位和对称性明显更高。结论:使用组合条件的SHA测试是可行的,而不会显著影响解释。与成人相比,儿童SHA测试结果更高,支持对儿童规范数据的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Age and Paradigm on Pediatric Sinusoidal Harmonic Acceleration Testing.

Purpose: This study aims to examine the effect of age and several methodological alterations such as position (parent lap vs. car seat), calibration strategy (standard vs. default), and illuminance on sinusoidal harmonic acceleration (SHA) outcomes in children aged 6 months to 5 years.

Method: Fifty-two healthy children, aged 6 months to 5 years, and 23 healthy adults, aged 22 to 39 years, participated. To assess the effect of light illuminance on the corneoretinal potential, adults completed SHA at 0.16 Hz immediately, 5 and 10 min after the rotary chair door was closed, and then again after 10 s of light illumination. To assess the effect of position and calibration strategy, adults completed SHA using default and standard calibration in a standard seat and in a forward seat position. In children, SHA was completed at 0.01, 0.04., and 0.16 Hz in a car seat or booster seat and in a parent's lap, if tolerated.

Results: Gain decreased with darkness adaptation and significantly increased in response to using a light wand. In the adults, gain was higher regardless of test position using default calibration and significantly lower in forward seat position using standard calibration; however, in the pediatric group, there were no significant differences in outcomes relative to age or position. Overall, children had significantly higher gain, phase, and symmetry when compared to the adults.

Conclusions: SHA testing is feasible using a combination of conditions without significantly affecting interpretation. Pediatric SHA test outcomes were higher compared to those of adults, supporting the need for pediatric normative data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Audiology
American Journal of Audiology AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
163
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mission: AJA publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles pertaining to clinical audiology methods and issues, and serves as an outlet for discussion of related professional and educational issues and ideas. The journal is an international outlet for research on clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, management and outcomes of hearing and balance disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. The clinical orientation of the journal allows for the publication of reports on audiology as implemented nationally and internationally, including novel clinical procedures, approaches, and cases. AJA seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of clinical audiology, including audiologic/aural rehabilitation; balance and balance disorders; cultural and linguistic diversity; detection, diagnosis, prevention, habilitation, rehabilitation, and monitoring of hearing loss; hearing aids, cochlear implants, and hearing-assistive technology; hearing disorders; lifespan perspectives on auditory function; speech perception; and tinnitus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信