双语表达性词汇量表概念评分的创新。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Lillian Durán, Mónica Zegers, Julian M Siebert, Cengiz Zopluoglu, Javier Jasso, Amy Pratt, Francesca Pei, Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini
{"title":"双语表达性词汇量表概念评分的创新。","authors":"Lillian Durán, Mónica Zegers, Julian M Siebert, Cengiz Zopluoglu, Javier Jasso, Amy Pratt, Francesca Pei, Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini","doi":"10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Conceptual scoring is a useful approach to bilingual vocabulary tests that can identify language delays or impairments by considering bilingual children's lexical-semantic knowledge in both languages. The purpose of this study was to develop and calibrate a conceptually scored expressive vocabulary measure, the Multitudes Expressive Vocabulary (EVO) task, for use in screening Spanish-English bilingual children.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Item design of the English and Spanish items was informed by prior literature and bilingual corpus data, and item review was conducted to ensure linguistic appropriateness and to minimize racial or cultural bias in English and Spanish versions. To begin item calibration in each language, English and Spanish items were administered to the same 1,219 bilingual children enrolled in kindergarten and first grade. Item-level difficulties were calculated using Rasch modeling in each language and then were correlated across languages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Correlations met minimum thresholds, which justified joint calibration on a unitary scale, and there was evidence of unidimensionality. The conceptually scored version had appropriate item fit statistics across the range of ability. Finally, moderately positive correlations with an existing measure of bilingual expressive vocabulary provided evidence of criterion validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The development process of the Multitudes conceptually scored expressive vocabulary screening measure is described. A final set of empirically derived items had appropriate fit statistics and had evidence of construct validity when conceptually scored. Multitudes EVO represents an innovation in universal screening by allowing students to respond in English or Spanish, which improves accuracy and efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":49240,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"2618-2631"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12452816/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Innovations in Conceptual Scoring of a Bilingual Expressive Vocabulary Measure.\",\"authors\":\"Lillian Durán, Mónica Zegers, Julian M Siebert, Cengiz Zopluoglu, Javier Jasso, Amy Pratt, Francesca Pei, Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini\",\"doi\":\"10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00524\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Conceptual scoring is a useful approach to bilingual vocabulary tests that can identify language delays or impairments by considering bilingual children's lexical-semantic knowledge in both languages. The purpose of this study was to develop and calibrate a conceptually scored expressive vocabulary measure, the Multitudes Expressive Vocabulary (EVO) task, for use in screening Spanish-English bilingual children.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Item design of the English and Spanish items was informed by prior literature and bilingual corpus data, and item review was conducted to ensure linguistic appropriateness and to minimize racial or cultural bias in English and Spanish versions. To begin item calibration in each language, English and Spanish items were administered to the same 1,219 bilingual children enrolled in kindergarten and first grade. Item-level difficulties were calculated using Rasch modeling in each language and then were correlated across languages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Correlations met minimum thresholds, which justified joint calibration on a unitary scale, and there was evidence of unidimensionality. The conceptually scored version had appropriate item fit statistics across the range of ability. Finally, moderately positive correlations with an existing measure of bilingual expressive vocabulary provided evidence of criterion validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The development process of the Multitudes conceptually scored expressive vocabulary screening measure is described. A final set of empirically derived items had appropriate fit statistics and had evidence of construct validity when conceptually scored. Multitudes EVO represents an innovation in universal screening by allowing students to respond in English or Spanish, which improves accuracy and efficiency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2618-2631\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12452816/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00524\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00524","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:概念计分是一种有效的双语词汇测试方法,可以通过考虑双语儿童在两种语言中的词汇-语义知识来识别语言延迟或语言障碍。本研究的目的是开发和校准一个概念计分的表达性词汇测试,即多重表达性词汇(EVO)任务,用于筛选西班牙语-英语双语儿童。方法:英语和西班牙语题项的设计参考已有文献和双语语料库数据,并进行题项审查,以确保英语和西班牙语版本的语言适当性,并尽量减少种族或文化偏见。为了开始每种语言的项目校准,对同样的1,219名幼儿园和一年级双语儿童进行了英语和西班牙语项目的管理。在每种语言中使用Rasch模型计算项目级难度,然后在不同语言之间进行关联。结果:相关性满足最小阈值,证明在单一尺度上联合校准是合理的,并且存在单维性的证据。概念评分版本在能力范围内有适当的项目拟合统计。最后,与现有双语表达性词汇测量的适度正相关提供了标准效度的证据。结论:描述了多元概念得分表达性词汇筛选量表的发展过程。最后一组经验推导的项目有适当的拟合统计,并在概念得分时具有构造效度的证据。Multitudes EVO代表了普遍筛选的创新,允许学生用英语或西班牙语回答,这提高了准确性和效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Innovations in Conceptual Scoring of a Bilingual Expressive Vocabulary Measure.

Purpose: Conceptual scoring is a useful approach to bilingual vocabulary tests that can identify language delays or impairments by considering bilingual children's lexical-semantic knowledge in both languages. The purpose of this study was to develop and calibrate a conceptually scored expressive vocabulary measure, the Multitudes Expressive Vocabulary (EVO) task, for use in screening Spanish-English bilingual children.

Method: Item design of the English and Spanish items was informed by prior literature and bilingual corpus data, and item review was conducted to ensure linguistic appropriateness and to minimize racial or cultural bias in English and Spanish versions. To begin item calibration in each language, English and Spanish items were administered to the same 1,219 bilingual children enrolled in kindergarten and first grade. Item-level difficulties were calculated using Rasch modeling in each language and then were correlated across languages.

Results: Correlations met minimum thresholds, which justified joint calibration on a unitary scale, and there was evidence of unidimensionality. The conceptually scored version had appropriate item fit statistics across the range of ability. Finally, moderately positive correlations with an existing measure of bilingual expressive vocabulary provided evidence of criterion validity.

Conclusions: The development process of the Multitudes conceptually scored expressive vocabulary screening measure is described. A final set of empirically derived items had appropriate fit statistics and had evidence of construct validity when conceptually scored. Multitudes EVO represents an innovation in universal screening by allowing students to respond in English or Spanish, which improves accuracy and efficiency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.50%
发文量
353
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mission: AJSLP publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles on all aspects of clinical practice in speech-language pathology. The journal is an international outlet for clinical research pertaining to screening, detection, diagnosis, management, and outcomes of communication and swallowing disorders across the lifespan as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. Because of its clinical orientation, the journal disseminates research findings applicable to diverse aspects of clinical practice in speech-language pathology. AJSLP seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of speech-language pathology, including aphasia; apraxia of speech and childhood apraxia of speech; aural rehabilitation; augmentative and alternative communication; cognitive impairment; craniofacial disorders; dysarthria; fluency disorders; language disorders in children; speech sound disorders; swallowing, dysphagia, and feeding disorders; and voice disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信