莫桑比克莫佩亚获得清洁水和卫生设施的机会有限:在霍乱爆发背景下的描述。

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ekhiñe Oroz Torrea, Saimado Imputiua, Nika Gorski, Eldo Elobolobo, Joanna Furnival-Adams, Edgar Jamisse, Patricia Nicolas, Julia Montaña, Vegovito Vegove, Humberto Munguambe, Paula Ruiz-Castillo, Hansel Mundaca, Matthew Rudd, Regina Rabinovich, Francisco Saute, Charfudin Sacoor, Carlos Chaccour
{"title":"莫桑比克莫佩亚获得清洁水和卫生设施的机会有限:在霍乱爆发背景下的描述。","authors":"Ekhiñe Oroz Torrea, Saimado Imputiua, Nika Gorski, Eldo Elobolobo, Joanna Furnival-Adams, Edgar Jamisse, Patricia Nicolas, Julia Montaña, Vegovito Vegove, Humberto Munguambe, Paula Ruiz-Castillo, Hansel Mundaca, Matthew Rudd, Regina Rabinovich, Francisco Saute, Charfudin Sacoor, Carlos Chaccour","doi":"10.7189/jogh.15.04197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inadequate access to safe water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) accounts for a high burden of morbidity and mortality in impoverished regions. This is significantly due to infectious diseases and the direct impact on social and economic well-being. The high burden of communicable diseases and malnutrition in Mozambique, as well as high vulnerability to climate change, results in increased risk of WASH-related diseases. Our objective was to describe access to safe water and sanitation practices in Mopeia, a remote rural district in Mozambique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The source of data for this analysis is a cross-sectional, demographic survey carried out in Mopeia in 2021 under the Broad One Health Endectocide-based Malaria Intervention in Africa project, a cluster-randomised trial to assess the impact of ivermectin on malaria transmission. The survey was conducted in all households of a sub-population created for the trial, and it included questions about WASH-related practices at the household level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that  4200 (56.29%) households have an improved water source at walking distance, which is drastically different to sanitation practices, where 6608 (88.56%) households do not have access to at least one basic sanitation service. Data on water access for Mopeia was similar to that reported in rural contexts in sub-Saharan Africa, yet the district remains off-track from achieving universal safe water coverage in the next few years. Regarding sanitation, the use of unsafe sanitation services is more widespread than in the average rural sub-Saharan Africa (75.00%), with twice as many households (n = 3897, 56.08%) practising open land defecation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mopeia is still far from achieving universal safe water and sanitation coverage by 2030, especially in sanitation, and remains prone to outbreaks and has a high burden of WASH-related diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":48734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Health","volume":"15 ","pages":"04197"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12247658/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Limited access to clean water and sanitation in Mopeia, Mozambique: a description in the context of a cholera outbreak.\",\"authors\":\"Ekhiñe Oroz Torrea, Saimado Imputiua, Nika Gorski, Eldo Elobolobo, Joanna Furnival-Adams, Edgar Jamisse, Patricia Nicolas, Julia Montaña, Vegovito Vegove, Humberto Munguambe, Paula Ruiz-Castillo, Hansel Mundaca, Matthew Rudd, Regina Rabinovich, Francisco Saute, Charfudin Sacoor, Carlos Chaccour\",\"doi\":\"10.7189/jogh.15.04197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inadequate access to safe water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) accounts for a high burden of morbidity and mortality in impoverished regions. This is significantly due to infectious diseases and the direct impact on social and economic well-being. The high burden of communicable diseases and malnutrition in Mozambique, as well as high vulnerability to climate change, results in increased risk of WASH-related diseases. Our objective was to describe access to safe water and sanitation practices in Mopeia, a remote rural district in Mozambique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The source of data for this analysis is a cross-sectional, demographic survey carried out in Mopeia in 2021 under the Broad One Health Endectocide-based Malaria Intervention in Africa project, a cluster-randomised trial to assess the impact of ivermectin on malaria transmission. The survey was conducted in all households of a sub-population created for the trial, and it included questions about WASH-related practices at the household level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that  4200 (56.29%) households have an improved water source at walking distance, which is drastically different to sanitation practices, where 6608 (88.56%) households do not have access to at least one basic sanitation service. Data on water access for Mopeia was similar to that reported in rural contexts in sub-Saharan Africa, yet the district remains off-track from achieving universal safe water coverage in the next few years. Regarding sanitation, the use of unsafe sanitation services is more widespread than in the average rural sub-Saharan Africa (75.00%), with twice as many households (n = 3897, 56.08%) practising open land defecation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mopeia is still far from achieving universal safe water and sanitation coverage by 2030, especially in sanitation, and remains prone to outbreaks and has a high burden of WASH-related diseases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Global Health\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"04197\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12247658/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.15.04197\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.15.04197","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:缺乏安全饮用水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)是贫困地区发病率和死亡率高负担的原因。这主要是由于传染病及其对社会和经济福祉的直接影响。莫桑比克传染病和营养不良的高负担,以及对气候变化的高度脆弱性,导致与wash有关的疾病的风险增加。我们的目标是描述在莫桑比克偏远农村地区莫佩亚获得安全饮用水和卫生设施的情况。方法:本分析的数据来源是2021年在莫佩亚开展的一项横断面人口调查,该调查是在基于“广泛的健康消灭疟疾”的非洲疟疾干预项目下进行的,这是一项评估伊维菌素对疟疾传播影响的聚类随机试验。这项调查是在为试验创建的一个亚群体的所有家庭中进行的,调查包括家庭层面上与wash相关的实践问题。结果:4200户(56.29%)家庭在步行距离内获得了改善的水源,这与卫生习惯有很大不同,其中6608户(88.56%)家庭没有获得至少一项基本卫生服务。莫佩亚的用水数据与撒哈拉以南非洲农村地区的数据相似,但该地区在未来几年内仍无法实现普遍安全用水覆盖。在环境卫生方面,不安全环境卫生服务的使用比撒哈拉以南非洲农村的平均水平(75.00%)更为普遍,在露天土地上排便的家庭(n = 3897, 56.08%)是其他地区的两倍。结论:到2030年,莫桑比克仍远未实现安全饮用水和卫生设施的普遍覆盖,特别是在卫生设施方面,而且仍然容易爆发疫情,与wash有关的疾病负担很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Limited access to clean water and sanitation in Mopeia, Mozambique: a description in the context of a cholera outbreak.

Limited access to clean water and sanitation in Mopeia, Mozambique: a description in the context of a cholera outbreak.

Limited access to clean water and sanitation in Mopeia, Mozambique: a description in the context of a cholera outbreak.

Background: Inadequate access to safe water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) accounts for a high burden of morbidity and mortality in impoverished regions. This is significantly due to infectious diseases and the direct impact on social and economic well-being. The high burden of communicable diseases and malnutrition in Mozambique, as well as high vulnerability to climate change, results in increased risk of WASH-related diseases. Our objective was to describe access to safe water and sanitation practices in Mopeia, a remote rural district in Mozambique.

Methods: The source of data for this analysis is a cross-sectional, demographic survey carried out in Mopeia in 2021 under the Broad One Health Endectocide-based Malaria Intervention in Africa project, a cluster-randomised trial to assess the impact of ivermectin on malaria transmission. The survey was conducted in all households of a sub-population created for the trial, and it included questions about WASH-related practices at the household level.

Results: The results showed that  4200 (56.29%) households have an improved water source at walking distance, which is drastically different to sanitation practices, where 6608 (88.56%) households do not have access to at least one basic sanitation service. Data on water access for Mopeia was similar to that reported in rural contexts in sub-Saharan Africa, yet the district remains off-track from achieving universal safe water coverage in the next few years. Regarding sanitation, the use of unsafe sanitation services is more widespread than in the average rural sub-Saharan Africa (75.00%), with twice as many households (n = 3897, 56.08%) practising open land defecation.

Conclusions: Mopeia is still far from achieving universal safe water and sanitation coverage by 2030, especially in sanitation, and remains prone to outbreaks and has a high burden of WASH-related diseases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Global Health
Journal of Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
240
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Global Health is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Edinburgh University Global Health Society, a not-for-profit organization registered in the UK. We publish editorials, news, viewpoints, original research and review articles in two issues per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信