契约主义道德认知:从规范到描述的三个层次分析。

IF 3.8 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Arthur Le Pargneux
{"title":"契约主义道德认知:从规范到描述的三个层次分析。","authors":"Arthur Le Pargneux","doi":"10.1002/wcs.70011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Contractualist moral theories view morality as a matter of mutually beneficial agreements among rational agents. Compared to its rivals in moral philosophy-consequentialism, deontology, and virtue ethics-contractualism has only recently started to attract attention in empirical work on the cognitive science of morality. Is it fruitful to adopt a contractualist lens to better understand how moral cognition works? After introducing the main contractualist theories in contemporary moral philosophy, I present five reasons to take inspiration from this family of normative theories to develop descriptive accounts of morality. Then, I review how the contractualist framework has been used to contribute to our understanding of moral cognition at three interrelated levels of analysis: Morality's evolutionary logic, its cognitive organization, and the specific cognitive processes and forms of reasoning involved in moral judgment and decision making. First, several evolutionary accounts of morality argue that its evolutionary logic must be understood in contractualist terms. Second, resource-rational contractualism proposes that the subcomponents of moral cognition-including well-studied rule- and outcome-based mechanisms, and much less studied agreement-based processes-are organized to efficiently approximate the outcome of explicit negotiation under resource constraints. Third, recent empirical developments suggest that three characteristically contractualist forms of reasoning-virtual bargaining, we-reasoning, and universalization-can be involved in producing moral judgments and decisions in a variety of contexts. Beyond the traditional distinction between rules and consequences, these various research programs open a third way for the cognitive science of morality, one based on agreement. This article is categorized under: Psychology > Reasoning and Decision Making Economics > Interactive Decision-Making Philosophy > Value.</p>","PeriodicalId":47720,"journal":{"name":"Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Cognitive Science","volume":"16 4","pages":"e70011"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12245550/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contractualist Moral Cognition: From the Normative to the Descriptive at Three Levels of Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Arthur Le Pargneux\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/wcs.70011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Contractualist moral theories view morality as a matter of mutually beneficial agreements among rational agents. Compared to its rivals in moral philosophy-consequentialism, deontology, and virtue ethics-contractualism has only recently started to attract attention in empirical work on the cognitive science of morality. Is it fruitful to adopt a contractualist lens to better understand how moral cognition works? After introducing the main contractualist theories in contemporary moral philosophy, I present five reasons to take inspiration from this family of normative theories to develop descriptive accounts of morality. Then, I review how the contractualist framework has been used to contribute to our understanding of moral cognition at three interrelated levels of analysis: Morality's evolutionary logic, its cognitive organization, and the specific cognitive processes and forms of reasoning involved in moral judgment and decision making. First, several evolutionary accounts of morality argue that its evolutionary logic must be understood in contractualist terms. Second, resource-rational contractualism proposes that the subcomponents of moral cognition-including well-studied rule- and outcome-based mechanisms, and much less studied agreement-based processes-are organized to efficiently approximate the outcome of explicit negotiation under resource constraints. Third, recent empirical developments suggest that three characteristically contractualist forms of reasoning-virtual bargaining, we-reasoning, and universalization-can be involved in producing moral judgments and decisions in a variety of contexts. Beyond the traditional distinction between rules and consequences, these various research programs open a third way for the cognitive science of morality, one based on agreement. This article is categorized under: Psychology > Reasoning and Decision Making Economics > Interactive Decision-Making Philosophy > Value.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Cognitive Science\",\"volume\":\"16 4\",\"pages\":\"e70011\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12245550/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Cognitive Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.70011\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Cognitive Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.70011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

契约主义道德理论认为道德是理性行为者之间的互利协议。与道德哲学中的对手——结果主义、义务论和美德伦理学相比,契约主义直到最近才开始在道德认知科学的实证研究中引起人们的注意。采用契约主义的视角来更好地理解道德认知是如何运作的,这是否卓有成效?在介绍了当代道德哲学中的主要契约主义理论之后,我提出了五个理由,从这个规范理论家族中获得灵感,以发展道德的描述性描述。然后,我回顾了契约主义框架如何在三个相互关联的分析层面上有助于我们对道德认知的理解:道德的进化逻辑,其认知组织,以及涉及道德判断和决策的特定认知过程和推理形式。首先,一些关于道德的进化解释认为,它的进化逻辑必须用契约主义的术语来理解。其次,资源理性契约主义提出,道德认知的子成分——包括已经得到充分研究的基于规则和结果的机制,以及研究较少的基于协议的过程——被组织起来,以有效地近似资源约束下显性谈判的结果。第三,最近的实证发展表明,在各种情况下,三种典型的契约主义推理形式——虚拟讨价还价、自我推理和普遍化——可以参与产生道德判断和决策。除了传统的规则和后果的区别之外,这些不同的研究项目为道德认知科学开辟了第三条道路,一条基于共识的道路。本文分类如下:心理学b>推理与决策经济学>互动决策哲学>价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Contractualist Moral Cognition: From the Normative to the Descriptive at Three Levels of Analysis.

Contractualist Moral Cognition: From the Normative to the Descriptive at Three Levels of Analysis.

Contractualist Moral Cognition: From the Normative to the Descriptive at Three Levels of Analysis.

Contractualist Moral Cognition: From the Normative to the Descriptive at Three Levels of Analysis.

Contractualist moral theories view morality as a matter of mutually beneficial agreements among rational agents. Compared to its rivals in moral philosophy-consequentialism, deontology, and virtue ethics-contractualism has only recently started to attract attention in empirical work on the cognitive science of morality. Is it fruitful to adopt a contractualist lens to better understand how moral cognition works? After introducing the main contractualist theories in contemporary moral philosophy, I present five reasons to take inspiration from this family of normative theories to develop descriptive accounts of morality. Then, I review how the contractualist framework has been used to contribute to our understanding of moral cognition at three interrelated levels of analysis: Morality's evolutionary logic, its cognitive organization, and the specific cognitive processes and forms of reasoning involved in moral judgment and decision making. First, several evolutionary accounts of morality argue that its evolutionary logic must be understood in contractualist terms. Second, resource-rational contractualism proposes that the subcomponents of moral cognition-including well-studied rule- and outcome-based mechanisms, and much less studied agreement-based processes-are organized to efficiently approximate the outcome of explicit negotiation under resource constraints. Third, recent empirical developments suggest that three characteristically contractualist forms of reasoning-virtual bargaining, we-reasoning, and universalization-can be involved in producing moral judgments and decisions in a variety of contexts. Beyond the traditional distinction between rules and consequences, these various research programs open a third way for the cognitive science of morality, one based on agreement. This article is categorized under: Psychology > Reasoning and Decision Making Economics > Interactive Decision-Making Philosophy > Value.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
50
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信