多元医疗保险制度中医疗保险覆盖面的不平等:来自印度的证据。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Pragyan Monalisa Sahoo, Himanshu Sekhar Rout
{"title":"多元医疗保险制度中医疗保险覆盖面的不平等:来自印度的证据。","authors":"Pragyan Monalisa Sahoo, Himanshu Sekhar Rout","doi":"10.1002/hpm.70008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Persistent inequality in financial protection mechanisms in healthcare continues to be a major challenge within India's pluralistic health insurance system, disproportionately disadvantaging marginalised groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study uses NFHS 4 and 5 household data to investigate inequality in health insurance coverage prevalence and transition across socioeconomic and demographic strata. It categorises health insurance coverage based on the number and type of coverage, considering factors such as the provider, pooling mechanism, and target population. We employ descriptive statistics and the concentration index to assess the prevalence of health insurance coverage. To delve deeper into the factors influencing enrolment in different types of coverage, we created 24 mutually exclusive groups at the intersection of sex-income-marriage-caste. These categories, along with other explanatory variables, are analysed for their influence on the enrolment of coverage using multinomial logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although the proportion of health insurance coverage increased from NFHS 4 to NFHS 5, 59.01% of the sample population still lacked coverage, indicating insufficient progress. Both surveys reveal significant disparities in coverage based on state-level, social, economic, and demographic factors. While the role of social and demographic determinants remains relatively modest, the distributional gradient of insurance prevalence across economic strata and state categories was high. India's pluralistic health insurance system has resulted in the population being covered under different coverage mechanisms. However, among these various types of coverage, the majority of sample households were only single, predominantly under SHI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study investigated disparities in health insurance coverage across various social, economic, and demographic segments in India, revealing that inequalities are influenced by a combination of state-level, socioeconomic, and demographic factors. These findings call for a unified and inclusive health financing framework that can address systemic fragmentation. Moving towards a 'One Nation, One Insurance' model offers a transformative pathway to ensure equitable, efficient, and universal health coverage for all Indians. Addressing these determinants presents potential policy tools for improving coverage imbalances, thereby offering opportunities for targeted interventions to mitigate disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":47637,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inequality in Health Insurance Coverage in a Pluralistic Health Insurance System: Evidence From India.\",\"authors\":\"Pragyan Monalisa Sahoo, Himanshu Sekhar Rout\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hpm.70008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Persistent inequality in financial protection mechanisms in healthcare continues to be a major challenge within India's pluralistic health insurance system, disproportionately disadvantaging marginalised groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study uses NFHS 4 and 5 household data to investigate inequality in health insurance coverage prevalence and transition across socioeconomic and demographic strata. It categorises health insurance coverage based on the number and type of coverage, considering factors such as the provider, pooling mechanism, and target population. We employ descriptive statistics and the concentration index to assess the prevalence of health insurance coverage. To delve deeper into the factors influencing enrolment in different types of coverage, we created 24 mutually exclusive groups at the intersection of sex-income-marriage-caste. These categories, along with other explanatory variables, are analysed for their influence on the enrolment of coverage using multinomial logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although the proportion of health insurance coverage increased from NFHS 4 to NFHS 5, 59.01% of the sample population still lacked coverage, indicating insufficient progress. Both surveys reveal significant disparities in coverage based on state-level, social, economic, and demographic factors. While the role of social and demographic determinants remains relatively modest, the distributional gradient of insurance prevalence across economic strata and state categories was high. India's pluralistic health insurance system has resulted in the population being covered under different coverage mechanisms. However, among these various types of coverage, the majority of sample households were only single, predominantly under SHI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study investigated disparities in health insurance coverage across various social, economic, and demographic segments in India, revealing that inequalities are influenced by a combination of state-level, socioeconomic, and demographic factors. These findings call for a unified and inclusive health financing framework that can address systemic fragmentation. Moving towards a 'One Nation, One Insurance' model offers a transformative pathway to ensure equitable, efficient, and universal health coverage for all Indians. Addressing these determinants presents potential policy tools for improving coverage imbalances, thereby offering opportunities for targeted interventions to mitigate disparities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Health Planning and Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Health Planning and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.70008\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.70008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:医疗保健金融保护机制的持续不平等仍然是印度多元化医疗保险体系中的一个主要挑战,对边缘化群体造成不成比例的不利影响。方法:本研究使用NFHS 4和5家庭数据,调查不同社会经济和人口阶层的健康保险覆盖普及率和过渡的不平等。它根据保险的数量和类型对医疗保险进行分类,同时考虑到提供者、统筹机制和目标人群等因素。我们采用描述性统计和浓度指数来评估健康保险覆盖的普及程度。为了更深入地研究影响不同类型覆盖的入学率的因素,我们在性别、收入、婚姻和种姓的交叉点创建了24个相互排斥的群体。使用多项逻辑回归模型分析了这些类别以及其他解释变量对覆盖率登记的影响。结果:虽然健康保险覆盖比例从NFHS 4提高到NFHS 5,但仍有59.01%的样本人口缺乏健康保险覆盖,进展不足。两项调查都揭示了基于州一级、社会、经济和人口因素的覆盖率存在显著差异。虽然社会和人口决定因素的作用仍然相对温和,但保险普及率在经济阶层和国家类别之间的分布梯度很高。印度多元化的医疗保险制度导致人口在不同的保险机制下得到覆盖。然而,在这些不同类型的覆盖中,大多数样本家庭只是单身,主要是在SHI下。结论:该研究调查了印度不同社会、经济和人口阶层在医疗保险覆盖方面的差异,揭示了不平等受到邦一级、社会经济和人口因素的综合影响。这些发现呼吁建立一个统一和包容性的卫生筹资框架,以解决系统性碎片化问题。向“一国一险”模式迈进提供了一条变革性的途径,以确保所有印度人享有公平、高效和普遍的医疗保险。解决这些决定因素为改善覆盖不平衡提供了潜在的政策工具,从而为有针对性的干预措施提供了机会,以减轻差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inequality in Health Insurance Coverage in a Pluralistic Health Insurance System: Evidence From India.

Background: Persistent inequality in financial protection mechanisms in healthcare continues to be a major challenge within India's pluralistic health insurance system, disproportionately disadvantaging marginalised groups.

Methods: Our study uses NFHS 4 and 5 household data to investigate inequality in health insurance coverage prevalence and transition across socioeconomic and demographic strata. It categorises health insurance coverage based on the number and type of coverage, considering factors such as the provider, pooling mechanism, and target population. We employ descriptive statistics and the concentration index to assess the prevalence of health insurance coverage. To delve deeper into the factors influencing enrolment in different types of coverage, we created 24 mutually exclusive groups at the intersection of sex-income-marriage-caste. These categories, along with other explanatory variables, are analysed for their influence on the enrolment of coverage using multinomial logistic regression models.

Results: Although the proportion of health insurance coverage increased from NFHS 4 to NFHS 5, 59.01% of the sample population still lacked coverage, indicating insufficient progress. Both surveys reveal significant disparities in coverage based on state-level, social, economic, and demographic factors. While the role of social and demographic determinants remains relatively modest, the distributional gradient of insurance prevalence across economic strata and state categories was high. India's pluralistic health insurance system has resulted in the population being covered under different coverage mechanisms. However, among these various types of coverage, the majority of sample households were only single, predominantly under SHI.

Conclusions: The study investigated disparities in health insurance coverage across various social, economic, and demographic segments in India, revealing that inequalities are influenced by a combination of state-level, socioeconomic, and demographic factors. These findings call for a unified and inclusive health financing framework that can address systemic fragmentation. Moving towards a 'One Nation, One Insurance' model offers a transformative pathway to ensure equitable, efficient, and universal health coverage for all Indians. Addressing these determinants presents potential policy tools for improving coverage imbalances, thereby offering opportunities for targeted interventions to mitigate disparities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: Policy making and implementation, planning and management are widely recognized as central to effective health systems and services and to better health. Globalization, and the economic circumstances facing groups of countries worldwide, meanwhile present a great challenge for health planning and management. The aim of this quarterly journal is to offer a forum for publications which direct attention to major issues in health policy, planning and management. The intention is to maintain a balance between theory and practice, from a variety of disciplines, fields and perspectives. The Journal is explicitly international and multidisciplinary in scope and appeal: articles about policy, planning and management in countries at various stages of political, social, cultural and economic development are welcomed, as are those directed at the different levels (national, regional, local) of the health sector. Manuscripts are invited from a spectrum of different disciplines e.g., (the social sciences, management and medicine) as long as they advance our knowledge and understanding of the health sector. The Journal is therefore global, and eclectic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信