与坦桑尼亚动物中的非人畜共患疾病相比,对人畜共患疾病暴发的反应更为及时。

IF 1.7 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Esron Karimuribo, Veronica Masawe, Lars Eik Olav, Doreen Ndossi, Ann-Katrin Llarena, Calvin Sindato
{"title":"与坦桑尼亚动物中的非人畜共患疾病相比,对人畜共患疾病暴发的反应更为及时。","authors":"Esron Karimuribo, Veronica Masawe, Lars Eik Olav, Doreen Ndossi, Ann-Katrin Llarena, Calvin Sindato","doi":"10.1002/vms3.70483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Timeliness metrics analysis is a useful approach for tracking speed in actions and identifying gaps during disease outbreaks. There is limited information on the time taken for preventing, controlling and containing disease outbreaks in human and animal populations in Tanzania. We conducted timeliness metrics analysis on zoonotic and non-zoonotic disease outbreaks which occurred between May 2019 and April 2023 in 10 selected districts within four regions located in the Northern (Arusha and Kilimanjaro regions) and Southern Highlands zones (Mbeya and Songwe regions) of Tanzania. Field-based outbreak milestones for selected zoonotic diseases, namely rabies and anthrax and non-zoonotic diseases, African swine fever (ASF), contagious caprine pleuropneumonia and Peste des petits ruminants, were recorded. Modified metrics for One Health Surveillance were employed to estimate the time used for disease outbreak detection, notification, verification, risk assessment, laboratory confirmation, inter-sectoral sharing of information (for zoonotic diseases only), response and public communication. A total of 98 disease outbreaks, of which 63 were zoonotic (64.3%) and 35 were non-zoonotic (35.7%), were recorded. These outbreaks were distributed across the Northern (68/98) and Southern Highlands (30/98) zones. The time taken to detect zoonotic disease outbreaks was significantly shorter (median = 2 days, range = 1-48 days) than the time taken to detect non-zoonotic disease outbreaks (median = 3 days, range = 1-40 days) (p = 0.0485). Furthermore, the time taken to detect disease outbreaks in the Northern zone was significantly shorter (median = 2 days, range = 1-48 days) than the time taken in the Southern Highlands zone (median = 7 days, range = 1-40 days) (p = 0.0010). Variation between geographical locations was observed where in the Northern zone, a shorter time was taken to verify (median = 1 day, range = 1-14 days) and to respond (median = 1 day, range = 1-30 days) to disease outbreaks than in the Southern Highlands (verification time: median = 3 days, range = 1-30 days and response time: median = 30 days, range = 1-60 days). Such differences could be due to resource disparities in the two zones and shorter distance to access diagnostic facilities in the Northern zone. This is the first field-based timeliness metrics analysis study carried out in Tanzania. Findings of this study may be utilised to guide animal and public health interventions for effective and efficient surveillance and control of emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases. It is recommended that more investment is carried out in emergency preparedness for the timely management of zoonotic and non-zoonotic diseases in Tanzania.</p>","PeriodicalId":23543,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Medicine and Science","volume":"11 4","pages":"e70483"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12244262/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"More Timely Response to Outbreaks of Zoonotic Compared to Non-Zoonotic Diseases in Animals in Tanzania.\",\"authors\":\"Esron Karimuribo, Veronica Masawe, Lars Eik Olav, Doreen Ndossi, Ann-Katrin Llarena, Calvin Sindato\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/vms3.70483\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Timeliness metrics analysis is a useful approach for tracking speed in actions and identifying gaps during disease outbreaks. There is limited information on the time taken for preventing, controlling and containing disease outbreaks in human and animal populations in Tanzania. We conducted timeliness metrics analysis on zoonotic and non-zoonotic disease outbreaks which occurred between May 2019 and April 2023 in 10 selected districts within four regions located in the Northern (Arusha and Kilimanjaro regions) and Southern Highlands zones (Mbeya and Songwe regions) of Tanzania. Field-based outbreak milestones for selected zoonotic diseases, namely rabies and anthrax and non-zoonotic diseases, African swine fever (ASF), contagious caprine pleuropneumonia and Peste des petits ruminants, were recorded. Modified metrics for One Health Surveillance were employed to estimate the time used for disease outbreak detection, notification, verification, risk assessment, laboratory confirmation, inter-sectoral sharing of information (for zoonotic diseases only), response and public communication. A total of 98 disease outbreaks, of which 63 were zoonotic (64.3%) and 35 were non-zoonotic (35.7%), were recorded. These outbreaks were distributed across the Northern (68/98) and Southern Highlands (30/98) zones. The time taken to detect zoonotic disease outbreaks was significantly shorter (median = 2 days, range = 1-48 days) than the time taken to detect non-zoonotic disease outbreaks (median = 3 days, range = 1-40 days) (p = 0.0485). Furthermore, the time taken to detect disease outbreaks in the Northern zone was significantly shorter (median = 2 days, range = 1-48 days) than the time taken in the Southern Highlands zone (median = 7 days, range = 1-40 days) (p = 0.0010). Variation between geographical locations was observed where in the Northern zone, a shorter time was taken to verify (median = 1 day, range = 1-14 days) and to respond (median = 1 day, range = 1-30 days) to disease outbreaks than in the Southern Highlands (verification time: median = 3 days, range = 1-30 days and response time: median = 30 days, range = 1-60 days). Such differences could be due to resource disparities in the two zones and shorter distance to access diagnostic facilities in the Northern zone. This is the first field-based timeliness metrics analysis study carried out in Tanzania. Findings of this study may be utilised to guide animal and public health interventions for effective and efficient surveillance and control of emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases. It is recommended that more investment is carried out in emergency preparedness for the timely management of zoonotic and non-zoonotic diseases in Tanzania.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary Medicine and Science\",\"volume\":\"11 4\",\"pages\":\"e70483\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12244262/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary Medicine and Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.70483\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Medicine and Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.70483","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

时效性指标分析是跟踪行动速度和确定疾病暴发期间差距的有用方法。关于预防、控制和遏制坦桑尼亚人类和动物种群中疾病暴发所需时间的信息有限。我们对2019年5月至2023年4月期间在坦桑尼亚北部(阿鲁沙和乞力马扎罗地区)和南部高地地区(姆贝亚和松圭地区)四个地区的10个选定地区发生的人畜共患和非人畜共患疾病暴发进行了及时性指标分析。记录了选定的人畜共患疾病,即狂犬病、炭疽和非人畜共患疾病、非洲猪瘟、传染性山羊胸膜肺炎和小反刍兽疫的现场暴发里程碑。采用修改过的单一卫生监测指标来估计用于疾病暴发发现、通报、核实、风险评估、实验室确认、部门间信息共享(仅针对人畜共患疾病)、应对和公众沟通的时间。共发生疾病暴发98起,其中人畜共患病63起(64.3%),非人畜共患病35起(35.7%)。这些疫情分布在北部(68/98)和南部高地(30/98)地区。检测人畜共患疾病暴发所需的时间(中位数= 2天,范围= 1-48天)明显短于检测非人畜共患疾病暴发所需的时间(中位数= 3天,范围= 1-40天)(p = 0.0485)。此外,北部地区发现疾病暴发所需的时间(中位数= 2天,范围= 1-48天)明显短于南部高地地区(中位数= 7天,范围= 1-40天)(p = 0.0010)。观察到地理位置之间的差异,在北部地区,对疾病爆发进行核查(中位数= 1天,范围= 1-14天)和作出反应(中位数= 1天,范围= 1-30天)所需的时间比南部高地短(核查时间:中位数= 3天,范围= 1-30天,反应时间:中位数= 30天,范围= 1-60天)。这种差异可能是由于两个地区的资源差异以及前往北部地区诊断设施的距离较短。这是在坦桑尼亚开展的第一个基于实地的及时性指标分析研究。本研究结果可用于指导动物和公共卫生干预措施,以有效和高效地监测和控制新出现和再出现的传染病。建议在应急准备方面进行更多投资,以便及时管理坦桑尼亚的人畜共患病和非人畜共患病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

More Timely Response to Outbreaks of Zoonotic Compared to Non-Zoonotic Diseases in Animals in Tanzania.

More Timely Response to Outbreaks of Zoonotic Compared to Non-Zoonotic Diseases in Animals in Tanzania.

More Timely Response to Outbreaks of Zoonotic Compared to Non-Zoonotic Diseases in Animals in Tanzania.

More Timely Response to Outbreaks of Zoonotic Compared to Non-Zoonotic Diseases in Animals in Tanzania.

Timeliness metrics analysis is a useful approach for tracking speed in actions and identifying gaps during disease outbreaks. There is limited information on the time taken for preventing, controlling and containing disease outbreaks in human and animal populations in Tanzania. We conducted timeliness metrics analysis on zoonotic and non-zoonotic disease outbreaks which occurred between May 2019 and April 2023 in 10 selected districts within four regions located in the Northern (Arusha and Kilimanjaro regions) and Southern Highlands zones (Mbeya and Songwe regions) of Tanzania. Field-based outbreak milestones for selected zoonotic diseases, namely rabies and anthrax and non-zoonotic diseases, African swine fever (ASF), contagious caprine pleuropneumonia and Peste des petits ruminants, were recorded. Modified metrics for One Health Surveillance were employed to estimate the time used for disease outbreak detection, notification, verification, risk assessment, laboratory confirmation, inter-sectoral sharing of information (for zoonotic diseases only), response and public communication. A total of 98 disease outbreaks, of which 63 were zoonotic (64.3%) and 35 were non-zoonotic (35.7%), were recorded. These outbreaks were distributed across the Northern (68/98) and Southern Highlands (30/98) zones. The time taken to detect zoonotic disease outbreaks was significantly shorter (median = 2 days, range = 1-48 days) than the time taken to detect non-zoonotic disease outbreaks (median = 3 days, range = 1-40 days) (p = 0.0485). Furthermore, the time taken to detect disease outbreaks in the Northern zone was significantly shorter (median = 2 days, range = 1-48 days) than the time taken in the Southern Highlands zone (median = 7 days, range = 1-40 days) (p = 0.0010). Variation between geographical locations was observed where in the Northern zone, a shorter time was taken to verify (median = 1 day, range = 1-14 days) and to respond (median = 1 day, range = 1-30 days) to disease outbreaks than in the Southern Highlands (verification time: median = 3 days, range = 1-30 days and response time: median = 30 days, range = 1-60 days). Such differences could be due to resource disparities in the two zones and shorter distance to access diagnostic facilities in the Northern zone. This is the first field-based timeliness metrics analysis study carried out in Tanzania. Findings of this study may be utilised to guide animal and public health interventions for effective and efficient surveillance and control of emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases. It is recommended that more investment is carried out in emergency preparedness for the timely management of zoonotic and non-zoonotic diseases in Tanzania.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Veterinary Medicine and Science
Veterinary Medicine and Science Veterinary-General Veterinary
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
296
期刊介绍: Veterinary Medicine and Science is the peer-reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of research in all areas of veterinary medicine and science. The journal aims to serve the research community by providing a vehicle for authors wishing to publish interesting and high quality work in both fundamental and clinical veterinary medicine and science. Veterinary Medicine and Science publishes original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and research methods papers, along with invited editorials and commentaries. Original research papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper. We aim to be a truly global forum for high-quality research in veterinary medicine and science, and believe that the best research should be published and made widely accessible as quickly as possible. Veterinary Medicine and Science publishes papers submitted directly to the journal and those referred from a select group of prestigious journals published by Wiley-Blackwell. Veterinary Medicine and Science is a Wiley Open Access journal, one of a new series of peer-reviewed titles publishing quality research with speed and efficiency. For further information visit the Wiley Open Access website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信