PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂联合化疗与单独化疗对中国晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的疗效:基于3期随机对照试验的最新荟萃分析

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Jianfei Zhang, Min Liu, Dongyang Li, Jiali Luo, Min Wang
{"title":"PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂联合化疗与单独化疗对中国晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的疗效:基于3期随机对照试验的最新荟萃分析","authors":"Jianfei Zhang, Min Liu, Dongyang Li, Jiali Luo, Min Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12957-025-03934-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The combination of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with chemotherapy (PC) has shown promise in treating advanced NSCLC. However, its added benefit over chemotherapy alone in Chinese patients remains unclear. We performed an updated synthesis of phase 3 randomized controlled trails (RCTs) to assess both therapeutic effectiveness and associated safety of PC therapy in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched six different databases for relevant publications. Only phase 3 RCTs enrolling Chinese individuals with advanced NSCLC, contrasting PC and standalone chemotherapy, were eligible. The main outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Tumor responses and adverse effects (AEs) were assessed as secondary indicators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven phase 3 trials including 3712 Chinese participants were analyzed. The PC group showed significant better OS (Hazard ratio [HR]: 0.65 [0.60, 0.72], P < 0.00001), and PFS (HR: 0.49 [0.46, 0.53], P < 0.00001). Better survival rate at 6 to 60 months was observed in those given PC. Presence of brain metastases and receiving pembrolizumab were associated with improved outcomes in the PC subgroup. Regarding tumor responses, PC led to longer duration of response (HR: 0.43 [0.36, 0.50], P < 0.00001), and a higher objective response rate (risk ratio [RR]: 1.60 [1.49, 1.72], P < 0.00001). However, PC group exhibited more AEs and immune-related AEs (irAEs) in all severity levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PIC may offer superior clinical benefits over chemotherapy alone in Chinese patients with advanced NSCLC, though with irAEs that warrants careful monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":23856,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":"23 1","pages":"273"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12247408/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for Chinese patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: an updated meta-analysis based on phase 3 randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Jianfei Zhang, Min Liu, Dongyang Li, Jiali Luo, Min Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12957-025-03934-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The combination of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with chemotherapy (PC) has shown promise in treating advanced NSCLC. However, its added benefit over chemotherapy alone in Chinese patients remains unclear. We performed an updated synthesis of phase 3 randomized controlled trails (RCTs) to assess both therapeutic effectiveness and associated safety of PC therapy in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched six different databases for relevant publications. Only phase 3 RCTs enrolling Chinese individuals with advanced NSCLC, contrasting PC and standalone chemotherapy, were eligible. The main outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Tumor responses and adverse effects (AEs) were assessed as secondary indicators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven phase 3 trials including 3712 Chinese participants were analyzed. The PC group showed significant better OS (Hazard ratio [HR]: 0.65 [0.60, 0.72], P < 0.00001), and PFS (HR: 0.49 [0.46, 0.53], P < 0.00001). Better survival rate at 6 to 60 months was observed in those given PC. Presence of brain metastases and receiving pembrolizumab were associated with improved outcomes in the PC subgroup. Regarding tumor responses, PC led to longer duration of response (HR: 0.43 [0.36, 0.50], P < 0.00001), and a higher objective response rate (risk ratio [RR]: 1.60 [1.49, 1.72], P < 0.00001). However, PC group exhibited more AEs and immune-related AEs (irAEs) in all severity levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PIC may offer superior clinical benefits over chemotherapy alone in Chinese patients with advanced NSCLC, though with irAEs that warrants careful monitoring.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"273\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12247408/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-025-03934-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-025-03934-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂联合化疗(PC)在治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌中显示出前景。然而,在中国患者中,与单独化疗相比,它的额外益处尚不清楚。我们进行了3期随机对照试验(rct)的更新合成,以评估PC治疗在该人群中的治疗效果和相关安全性。方法:系统地检索6个不同数据库的相关文献。只有纳入中国晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的3期随机对照试验,比较了PC和单独化疗。主要结局是总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。肿瘤反应和不良反应(ae)作为次要指标进行评估。结果:11项3期试验包括3712名中国受试者进行了分析。结论:在中国晚期非小细胞肺癌患者中,PIC可能比单独化疗具有更优越的临床疗效,尽管有irae需要仔细监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for Chinese patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: an updated meta-analysis based on phase 3 randomized controlled trials.

Background: The combination of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with chemotherapy (PC) has shown promise in treating advanced NSCLC. However, its added benefit over chemotherapy alone in Chinese patients remains unclear. We performed an updated synthesis of phase 3 randomized controlled trails (RCTs) to assess both therapeutic effectiveness and associated safety of PC therapy in this population.

Methods: We systematically searched six different databases for relevant publications. Only phase 3 RCTs enrolling Chinese individuals with advanced NSCLC, contrasting PC and standalone chemotherapy, were eligible. The main outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Tumor responses and adverse effects (AEs) were assessed as secondary indicators.

Results: Eleven phase 3 trials including 3712 Chinese participants were analyzed. The PC group showed significant better OS (Hazard ratio [HR]: 0.65 [0.60, 0.72], P < 0.00001), and PFS (HR: 0.49 [0.46, 0.53], P < 0.00001). Better survival rate at 6 to 60 months was observed in those given PC. Presence of brain metastases and receiving pembrolizumab were associated with improved outcomes in the PC subgroup. Regarding tumor responses, PC led to longer duration of response (HR: 0.43 [0.36, 0.50], P < 0.00001), and a higher objective response rate (risk ratio [RR]: 1.60 [1.49, 1.72], P < 0.00001). However, PC group exhibited more AEs and immune-related AEs (irAEs) in all severity levels.

Conclusion: PIC may offer superior clinical benefits over chemotherapy alone in Chinese patients with advanced NSCLC, though with irAEs that warrants careful monitoring.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.60%
发文量
362
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgical Oncology publishes articles related to surgical oncology and its allied subjects, such as epidemiology, cancer research, biomarkers, prevention, pathology, radiology, cancer treatment, clinical trials, multimodality treatment and molecular biology. Emphasis is placed on original research articles. The journal also publishes significant clinical case reports, as well as balanced and timely reviews on selected topics. Oncology is a multidisciplinary super-speciality of which surgical oncology forms an integral component, especially with solid tumors. Surgical oncologists around the world are involved in research extending from detecting the mechanisms underlying the causation of cancer, to its treatment and prevention. The role of a surgical oncologist extends across the whole continuum of care. With continued developments in diagnosis and treatment, the role of a surgical oncologist is ever-changing. Hence, World Journal of Surgical Oncology aims to keep readers abreast with latest developments that will ultimately influence the work of surgical oncologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信