Jacob Maier, Andrew Meyer, Catherine Hord, Richard Steiner, Tarun Bhalla, Todd Ritzman, Lorena Floccari
{"title":"脊髓鞘内注射吗啡的时机及其对小儿脊柱外科疼痛控制的影响。","authors":"Jacob Maier, Andrew Meyer, Catherine Hord, Richard Steiner, Tarun Bhalla, Todd Ritzman, Lorena Floccari","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes of intrathecal morphine (ITM) administered preemptively versus intraoperatively, either before or after correction, in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>As a component of a multimodal pain regimen, ITM can reduce postoperative pain in pediatric patients undergoing spinal fusion, but the optimal timing of administration is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive AIS patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were either given ITM prior to incision, during exposure, or after deformity correction. Opiate consumption was measured and converted to milligram of morphine equivalents (MME).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 146 patients were included (85 pre-operative, 17 intraoperative before correction, and 45 intraoperative after correction). There were no statistically significant differences among groups in patient demographics or curve characteristics (P>0.05). ITM dosages were similar among groups, as were other intraoperative anesthetic infusions, including vasopressors and total intraoperative MME. There were no significant differences in operative time, blood loss, transfusion rate, or postoperative opioid consumption, including daily and total hospitalization MME (69.7 v 60.7 v 75.3, P=0.365). Hospital length of stay (2.9 v 2.8 v 2.9 d, P=0.749), potential side effects (hypotension, pruritis, nausea/vomiting), 30-day emergency department visits, and readmissions were all similar among groups (all P>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For AIS patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion, the timing of intrathecal morphine administration has no significant impact on perioperative pain control, functional recovery, or early outcomes. No difference in MME administration, length of stay, potential side effects (hypotension, pruritis, nausea/vomiting), or early outcomes was observed between groups. Thus, ITM can be given either pre- or intra-operatively at the discretion of the surgical and anesthetic teams.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Timing of Intrathecal Morphine Administration and its Impact on Pain Control in Pediatric Spine Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Jacob Maier, Andrew Meyer, Catherine Hord, Richard Steiner, Tarun Bhalla, Todd Ritzman, Lorena Floccari\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes of intrathecal morphine (ITM) administered preemptively versus intraoperatively, either before or after correction, in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>As a component of a multimodal pain regimen, ITM can reduce postoperative pain in pediatric patients undergoing spinal fusion, but the optimal timing of administration is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive AIS patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were either given ITM prior to incision, during exposure, or after deformity correction. Opiate consumption was measured and converted to milligram of morphine equivalents (MME).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 146 patients were included (85 pre-operative, 17 intraoperative before correction, and 45 intraoperative after correction). There were no statistically significant differences among groups in patient demographics or curve characteristics (P>0.05). ITM dosages were similar among groups, as were other intraoperative anesthetic infusions, including vasopressors and total intraoperative MME. There were no significant differences in operative time, blood loss, transfusion rate, or postoperative opioid consumption, including daily and total hospitalization MME (69.7 v 60.7 v 75.3, P=0.365). Hospital length of stay (2.9 v 2.8 v 2.9 d, P=0.749), potential side effects (hypotension, pruritis, nausea/vomiting), 30-day emergency department visits, and readmissions were all similar among groups (all P>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For AIS patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion, the timing of intrathecal morphine administration has no significant impact on perioperative pain control, functional recovery, or early outcomes. No difference in MME administration, length of stay, potential side effects (hypotension, pruritis, nausea/vomiting), or early outcomes was observed between groups. Thus, ITM can be given either pre- or intra-operatively at the discretion of the surgical and anesthetic teams.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005398\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005398","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究设计:回顾性队列研究。目的:本研究的目的是比较青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)患者在矫治前或矫治后,预先给药鞘内吗啡(ITM)与术中给药吗啡(ITM)的结果。背景资料摘要:ITM作为多模式疼痛治疗方案的一个组成部分,可以减轻脊柱融合术儿童患者的术后疼痛,但最佳给药时间尚不清楚。方法:回顾性分析在同一机构连续行后路脊柱融合术的AIS患者。患者在切开前、暴露时或畸形矫正后给予ITM。测量阿片剂消耗量并将其转换为吗啡当量毫克(MME)。结果:共纳入患者146例(术前85例,术中矫正前17例,术中矫正后45例)。两组患者人口统计学及曲线特征比较,差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。各组间ITM剂量相似,术中其他麻醉剂输注,包括血管加压剂和术中总MME。手术时间、出血量、输血率或术后阿片类药物消耗,包括每日和总住院MME (69.7 v 60.7 v 75.3, P=0.365)无显著差异。住院时间(2.9 v 2.8 v 2.9 d, P=0.749)、潜在副作用(低血压、瘙痒、恶心/呕吐)、30天急诊科就诊和再入院在两组间均相似(P均为0.05)。结论:对于接受后路脊柱融合术的AIS患者,鞘内注射吗啡的时机对围手术期疼痛控制、功能恢复或早期预后没有显著影响。在MME给药、住院时间、潜在副作用(低血压、瘙痒、恶心/呕吐)或早期结局方面,两组间没有观察到差异。因此,ITM可以在术前或术中由手术和麻醉团队决定。
Timing of Intrathecal Morphine Administration and its Impact on Pain Control in Pediatric Spine Surgery.
Study design: Retrospective cohort study.
Objective: The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes of intrathecal morphine (ITM) administered preemptively versus intraoperatively, either before or after correction, in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients.
Summary of background data: As a component of a multimodal pain regimen, ITM can reduce postoperative pain in pediatric patients undergoing spinal fusion, but the optimal timing of administration is unclear.
Methods: Consecutive AIS patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were either given ITM prior to incision, during exposure, or after deformity correction. Opiate consumption was measured and converted to milligram of morphine equivalents (MME).
Results: A total of 146 patients were included (85 pre-operative, 17 intraoperative before correction, and 45 intraoperative after correction). There were no statistically significant differences among groups in patient demographics or curve characteristics (P>0.05). ITM dosages were similar among groups, as were other intraoperative anesthetic infusions, including vasopressors and total intraoperative MME. There were no significant differences in operative time, blood loss, transfusion rate, or postoperative opioid consumption, including daily and total hospitalization MME (69.7 v 60.7 v 75.3, P=0.365). Hospital length of stay (2.9 v 2.8 v 2.9 d, P=0.749), potential side effects (hypotension, pruritis, nausea/vomiting), 30-day emergency department visits, and readmissions were all similar among groups (all P>0.05).
Conclusion: For AIS patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion, the timing of intrathecal morphine administration has no significant impact on perioperative pain control, functional recovery, or early outcomes. No difference in MME administration, length of stay, potential side effects (hypotension, pruritis, nausea/vomiting), or early outcomes was observed between groups. Thus, ITM can be given either pre- or intra-operatively at the discretion of the surgical and anesthetic teams.
期刊介绍:
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store.
Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.