Amira M Taha, Wesam A Moawad, Sara A A Saed, Tala J Alhejazi, Youstina A Sabri, Mohamed Abd-ElGawad, Juan L Alcazar, Nihal Al Riyami, Ayatallah Khafagy, Yasmine A Mohammed, Ahmed H Saad
{"title":"腹部超声滑动征在评估重复剖宫产妇女严重腹内粘连累及子宫中的诊断准确性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Amira M Taha, Wesam A Moawad, Sara A A Saed, Tala J Alhejazi, Youstina A Sabri, Mohamed Abd-ElGawad, Juan L Alcazar, Nihal Al Riyami, Ayatallah Khafagy, Yasmine A Mohammed, Ahmed H Saad","doi":"10.18295/squmj.10.2024.063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review aimed to assess diagnostic accuracy of transabdominal ultrasonography (TAS) sliding sign in diagnosing severe intra-abdominal adhesions with repeated Caesarean delivery (CD). PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science and Scopus were searched for published studies until October 2022. Studies evaluating the sliding sign as a predictor of intra-abdominal adhesions after repeat CD were included. STATA and Comprehensive Meta-Analysis for meta-analysis was used. A total of 7 studies (1,318 patients) were included. For identifying severe intra-abdominal adhesions, sliding sign on TAS had a combined sensitivity (64%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 55-71%), specificity (93%, 95% CI: 89-96%), positive likelihood ratio (9.5, 95% CI: 5.7-16), negative likelihood ratio (0.39, 95% CI: 0.31-0.49) and diagnostic odds ratio (24, 95% CI: 13-46). Prediction intervals for sensitivity and specificity were 0.444-0.786 and 0.711-0.985, respectively. Sliding sign on TAS is a simple, non-invasive, good negative and practical method to exclude severe intra-abdominal adhesions involving the uterus with low sensitivity and high specificity.</p>","PeriodicalId":22083,"journal":{"name":"Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal","volume":"25 1","pages":"29-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12244295/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Accuracy of Abdominal Ultrasonographic Sliding Sign in the Evaluation of Severe Intra-Abdominal Adhesions Involving the Uterus in Women Undergoing Repeat Caesarean Delivery: <i>Systematic review and meta-analysis</i>.\",\"authors\":\"Amira M Taha, Wesam A Moawad, Sara A A Saed, Tala J Alhejazi, Youstina A Sabri, Mohamed Abd-ElGawad, Juan L Alcazar, Nihal Al Riyami, Ayatallah Khafagy, Yasmine A Mohammed, Ahmed H Saad\",\"doi\":\"10.18295/squmj.10.2024.063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This review aimed to assess diagnostic accuracy of transabdominal ultrasonography (TAS) sliding sign in diagnosing severe intra-abdominal adhesions with repeated Caesarean delivery (CD). PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science and Scopus were searched for published studies until October 2022. Studies evaluating the sliding sign as a predictor of intra-abdominal adhesions after repeat CD were included. STATA and Comprehensive Meta-Analysis for meta-analysis was used. A total of 7 studies (1,318 patients) were included. For identifying severe intra-abdominal adhesions, sliding sign on TAS had a combined sensitivity (64%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 55-71%), specificity (93%, 95% CI: 89-96%), positive likelihood ratio (9.5, 95% CI: 5.7-16), negative likelihood ratio (0.39, 95% CI: 0.31-0.49) and diagnostic odds ratio (24, 95% CI: 13-46). Prediction intervals for sensitivity and specificity were 0.444-0.786 and 0.711-0.985, respectively. Sliding sign on TAS is a simple, non-invasive, good negative and practical method to exclude severe intra-abdominal adhesions involving the uterus with low sensitivity and high specificity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"29-37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12244295/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18295/squmj.10.2024.063\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18295/squmj.10.2024.063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本综述旨在评估经腹超声(TAS)滑动征象对反复剖宫产(CD)严重腹内粘连的诊断准确性。PubMed, b谷歌Scholar, Web of Science和Scopus检索了截至2022年10月的已发表研究。评估滑动征象作为重复CD后腹内粘连预测因子的研究被纳入。meta分析采用STATA和综合meta分析。共纳入7项研究(1318例患者)。对于识别严重腹内粘连,TAS滑动征象具有综合敏感性(64%,95%可信区间[CI]: 55-71%)、特异性(93%,95% CI: 89-96%)、阳性似然比(9.5,95% CI: 5.7-16)、阴性似然比(0.39,95% CI: 0.31-0.49)和诊断优势比(24,95% CI: 13-46)。敏感性预测区间为0.444 ~ 0.786,特异性预测区间为0.711 ~ 0.985。TAS滑动征象是一种简单、无创、阴性效果好、实用的排除严重腹腔内粘连累及子宫的方法,敏感性低,特异性高。
Diagnostic Accuracy of Abdominal Ultrasonographic Sliding Sign in the Evaluation of Severe Intra-Abdominal Adhesions Involving the Uterus in Women Undergoing Repeat Caesarean Delivery: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
This review aimed to assess diagnostic accuracy of transabdominal ultrasonography (TAS) sliding sign in diagnosing severe intra-abdominal adhesions with repeated Caesarean delivery (CD). PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science and Scopus were searched for published studies until October 2022. Studies evaluating the sliding sign as a predictor of intra-abdominal adhesions after repeat CD were included. STATA and Comprehensive Meta-Analysis for meta-analysis was used. A total of 7 studies (1,318 patients) were included. For identifying severe intra-abdominal adhesions, sliding sign on TAS had a combined sensitivity (64%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 55-71%), specificity (93%, 95% CI: 89-96%), positive likelihood ratio (9.5, 95% CI: 5.7-16), negative likelihood ratio (0.39, 95% CI: 0.31-0.49) and diagnostic odds ratio (24, 95% CI: 13-46). Prediction intervals for sensitivity and specificity were 0.444-0.786 and 0.711-0.985, respectively. Sliding sign on TAS is a simple, non-invasive, good negative and practical method to exclude severe intra-abdominal adhesions involving the uterus with low sensitivity and high specificity.