不同处理方式和时间对转基因玉米秸秆还田土壤微生物群落的影响

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Yanbo Xie, Jun-Yan Xiang, Likun Long, Yue Ma, Zhenjuan Xing, Ling Wang, Chunyu Shao, Na Liu, Feiwu Li
{"title":"不同处理方式和时间对转基因玉米秸秆还田土壤微生物群落的影响","authors":"Yanbo Xie, Jun-Yan Xiang, Likun Long, Yue Ma, Zhenjuan Xing, Ling Wang, Chunyu Shao, Na Liu, Feiwu Li","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-09851-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding the impact of genetically modified (GM) crop straw return on soil ecosystems is crucial as GM crops become more prevalent. This study assesses the effects of straw mulching and deep tillage on soil microbial communities from GM and non-GM maize, highlighting potential ecological impacts. Shotgun metagenomic sequencing was utilized to analyze the microbial community structure and functional genes in soil samples collected at different times (30, 180, and 270 days) after straw mulching and deep tillage treatments. The study included insect-resistant transgenic maize varieties 2A-7 and CM8101 and their non-transgenic counterparts B73 and Zheng58. Different treatment methods significantly affect soil microbial alpha-diversity and beta-diversity, with deep tillage resulting in higher alpha-diversity compared to mulching, and the 180-day mark exhibiting the highest alpha-diversity across all sampling times. Early straw treatment prompted a rapid microbial response to nutrient availability, with notable changes in diversity and function over time. Straw treatments notably altered soil microbial functions, especially in carbon cycling and nutrient metabolism. Interestingly, the microbial effects of GM versus non-GM maize straw were similar, suggesting crop residue type under consistent soil management practices might not significantly alter microbial community structures. The methods and timing of straw treatments have a significant impact on soil microbial communities, surpassing the differences between GM and non-GM straw. These findings highlight the importance of straw management practices for sustainable agricultural ecosystem management.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"24820"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12246401/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of different treatment methods and timings on soil microbial communities with transgenic maize straw return.\",\"authors\":\"Yanbo Xie, Jun-Yan Xiang, Likun Long, Yue Ma, Zhenjuan Xing, Ling Wang, Chunyu Shao, Na Liu, Feiwu Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-09851-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Understanding the impact of genetically modified (GM) crop straw return on soil ecosystems is crucial as GM crops become more prevalent. This study assesses the effects of straw mulching and deep tillage on soil microbial communities from GM and non-GM maize, highlighting potential ecological impacts. Shotgun metagenomic sequencing was utilized to analyze the microbial community structure and functional genes in soil samples collected at different times (30, 180, and 270 days) after straw mulching and deep tillage treatments. The study included insect-resistant transgenic maize varieties 2A-7 and CM8101 and their non-transgenic counterparts B73 and Zheng58. Different treatment methods significantly affect soil microbial alpha-diversity and beta-diversity, with deep tillage resulting in higher alpha-diversity compared to mulching, and the 180-day mark exhibiting the highest alpha-diversity across all sampling times. Early straw treatment prompted a rapid microbial response to nutrient availability, with notable changes in diversity and function over time. Straw treatments notably altered soil microbial functions, especially in carbon cycling and nutrient metabolism. Interestingly, the microbial effects of GM versus non-GM maize straw were similar, suggesting crop residue type under consistent soil management practices might not significantly alter microbial community structures. The methods and timing of straw treatments have a significant impact on soil microbial communities, surpassing the differences between GM and non-GM straw. These findings highlight the importance of straw management practices for sustainable agricultural ecosystem management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"24820\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12246401/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-09851-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-09851-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着转基因作物越来越普遍,了解转基因作物秸秆还田对土壤生态系统的影响至关重要。本研究评估了秸秆覆盖和深耕对转基因玉米和非转基因玉米土壤微生物群落的影响,并强调了潜在的生态影响。采用霰弹枪宏基因组测序技术,对秸秆覆盖和深耕处理后不同时间(30、180、270天)土壤样品的微生物群落结构和功能基因进行分析。研究对象为转基因抗虫玉米品种2A-7和CM8101及其非转基因品种B73和郑58。不同处理方式对土壤微生物α多样性和β多样性有显著影响,深耕的α多样性高于覆盖,180天的α多样性在所有采样时间内均最高。早期秸秆处理促进了微生物对养分有效性的快速反应,随着时间的推移,其多样性和功能发生了显著变化。秸秆处理显著改变了土壤微生物功能,尤其是碳循环和养分代谢。有趣的是,转基因玉米秸秆与非转基因玉米秸秆的微生物效应相似,这表明在一致的土壤管理措施下,作物秸秆类型可能不会显著改变微生物群落结构。秸秆处理方式和时间对土壤微生物群落的影响显著,超过了转基因与非转基因秸秆之间的差异。这些发现突出了秸秆管理实践对可持续农业生态系统管理的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Impact of different treatment methods and timings on soil microbial communities with transgenic maize straw return.

Impact of different treatment methods and timings on soil microbial communities with transgenic maize straw return.

Impact of different treatment methods and timings on soil microbial communities with transgenic maize straw return.

Impact of different treatment methods and timings on soil microbial communities with transgenic maize straw return.

Understanding the impact of genetically modified (GM) crop straw return on soil ecosystems is crucial as GM crops become more prevalent. This study assesses the effects of straw mulching and deep tillage on soil microbial communities from GM and non-GM maize, highlighting potential ecological impacts. Shotgun metagenomic sequencing was utilized to analyze the microbial community structure and functional genes in soil samples collected at different times (30, 180, and 270 days) after straw mulching and deep tillage treatments. The study included insect-resistant transgenic maize varieties 2A-7 and CM8101 and their non-transgenic counterparts B73 and Zheng58. Different treatment methods significantly affect soil microbial alpha-diversity and beta-diversity, with deep tillage resulting in higher alpha-diversity compared to mulching, and the 180-day mark exhibiting the highest alpha-diversity across all sampling times. Early straw treatment prompted a rapid microbial response to nutrient availability, with notable changes in diversity and function over time. Straw treatments notably altered soil microbial functions, especially in carbon cycling and nutrient metabolism. Interestingly, the microbial effects of GM versus non-GM maize straw were similar, suggesting crop residue type under consistent soil management practices might not significantly alter microbial community structures. The methods and timing of straw treatments have a significant impact on soil microbial communities, surpassing the differences between GM and non-GM straw. These findings highlight the importance of straw management practices for sustainable agricultural ecosystem management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信