运动认知训练对老年痴呆患者认知功能和步态表现的影响:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Wei-Han Weng, Nai-Chen Yeh, Yea-Ru Yang, Ray-Yau Wang
{"title":"运动认知训练对老年痴呆患者认知功能和步态表现的影响:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Wei-Han Weng, Nai-Chen Yeh, Yea-Ru Yang, Ray-Yau Wang","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-09582-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Motor-cognitive training combines motor and cognitive tasks during the training. So far, its effectiveness on cognitive function and gait in people with dementia remains unknown, and whether it is superior to single physical or cognitive training has yet to be investigated. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to explore the effects of motor-cognitive training on cognitive function and gait in people with dementia. Randomized controlled trials comparing motor-cognitive training with cognitive intervention alone, physical exercise alone, or other control group programs were included. Outcomes included cognitive functions and single/dual task gait performance. We conducted subgroup analysis based on the type of intervention applied in the control group. The pooled meta-analysis showed significant improvements following motor-cognitive training compared to control interventions in global cognition (SMD = 1.00, 95% CI 0.75, 1.26, p < 0.00001), single gait speed (SMD = 0.4, 95% CI 0.19, 0.61, p = 0.0002), and dual-task gait speed (SMD = 0.28, 95% CI 0.01, 0.55, p = 0.05). In the subgroup analysis, motor-cognitive training exerted significantly more improvement in global cognition and single gait speed when compared to either physical or cognitive training alone, or other control. Our results demonstrated the positive effects of motor-cognitive training on global cognition and gait speed in people with dementia. However, no significant improvements were observed in memory, attention, or executive function.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"24915"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12246404/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of motor-cognitive training on cognitive function and gait performance in older adults with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Wei-Han Weng, Nai-Chen Yeh, Yea-Ru Yang, Ray-Yau Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-09582-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Motor-cognitive training combines motor and cognitive tasks during the training. So far, its effectiveness on cognitive function and gait in people with dementia remains unknown, and whether it is superior to single physical or cognitive training has yet to be investigated. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to explore the effects of motor-cognitive training on cognitive function and gait in people with dementia. Randomized controlled trials comparing motor-cognitive training with cognitive intervention alone, physical exercise alone, or other control group programs were included. Outcomes included cognitive functions and single/dual task gait performance. We conducted subgroup analysis based on the type of intervention applied in the control group. The pooled meta-analysis showed significant improvements following motor-cognitive training compared to control interventions in global cognition (SMD = 1.00, 95% CI 0.75, 1.26, p < 0.00001), single gait speed (SMD = 0.4, 95% CI 0.19, 0.61, p = 0.0002), and dual-task gait speed (SMD = 0.28, 95% CI 0.01, 0.55, p = 0.05). In the subgroup analysis, motor-cognitive training exerted significantly more improvement in global cognition and single gait speed when compared to either physical or cognitive training alone, or other control. Our results demonstrated the positive effects of motor-cognitive training on global cognition and gait speed in people with dementia. However, no significant improvements were observed in memory, attention, or executive function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"24915\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12246404/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-09582-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-09582-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

运动-认知训练在训练过程中将运动和认知任务结合起来。到目前为止,它对痴呆症患者认知功能和步态的影响尚不清楚,它是否优于单一的身体或认知训练还有待研究。因此,本荟萃分析旨在探讨运动认知训练对痴呆患者认知功能和步态的影响。将运动认知训练与单独的认知干预、单独的体育锻炼或其他对照组项目进行比较的随机对照试验包括在内。结果包括认知功能和单/双任务步态表现。我们根据对照组的干预方式进行亚组分析。综合荟萃分析显示,与对照干预相比,运动认知训练在整体认知方面有显著改善(SMD = 1.00, 95% CI 0.75, 1.26, p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effects of motor-cognitive training on cognitive function and gait performance in older adults with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Effects of motor-cognitive training on cognitive function and gait performance in older adults with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Effects of motor-cognitive training on cognitive function and gait performance in older adults with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Effects of motor-cognitive training on cognitive function and gait performance in older adults with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Motor-cognitive training combines motor and cognitive tasks during the training. So far, its effectiveness on cognitive function and gait in people with dementia remains unknown, and whether it is superior to single physical or cognitive training has yet to be investigated. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to explore the effects of motor-cognitive training on cognitive function and gait in people with dementia. Randomized controlled trials comparing motor-cognitive training with cognitive intervention alone, physical exercise alone, or other control group programs were included. Outcomes included cognitive functions and single/dual task gait performance. We conducted subgroup analysis based on the type of intervention applied in the control group. The pooled meta-analysis showed significant improvements following motor-cognitive training compared to control interventions in global cognition (SMD = 1.00, 95% CI 0.75, 1.26, p < 0.00001), single gait speed (SMD = 0.4, 95% CI 0.19, 0.61, p = 0.0002), and dual-task gait speed (SMD = 0.28, 95% CI 0.01, 0.55, p = 0.05). In the subgroup analysis, motor-cognitive training exerted significantly more improvement in global cognition and single gait speed when compared to either physical or cognitive training alone, or other control. Our results demonstrated the positive effects of motor-cognitive training on global cognition and gait speed in people with dementia. However, no significant improvements were observed in memory, attention, or executive function.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信