Wei-Han Weng, Nai-Chen Yeh, Yea-Ru Yang, Ray-Yau Wang
{"title":"运动认知训练对老年痴呆患者认知功能和步态表现的影响:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Wei-Han Weng, Nai-Chen Yeh, Yea-Ru Yang, Ray-Yau Wang","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-09582-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Motor-cognitive training combines motor and cognitive tasks during the training. So far, its effectiveness on cognitive function and gait in people with dementia remains unknown, and whether it is superior to single physical or cognitive training has yet to be investigated. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to explore the effects of motor-cognitive training on cognitive function and gait in people with dementia. Randomized controlled trials comparing motor-cognitive training with cognitive intervention alone, physical exercise alone, or other control group programs were included. Outcomes included cognitive functions and single/dual task gait performance. We conducted subgroup analysis based on the type of intervention applied in the control group. The pooled meta-analysis showed significant improvements following motor-cognitive training compared to control interventions in global cognition (SMD = 1.00, 95% CI 0.75, 1.26, p < 0.00001), single gait speed (SMD = 0.4, 95% CI 0.19, 0.61, p = 0.0002), and dual-task gait speed (SMD = 0.28, 95% CI 0.01, 0.55, p = 0.05). In the subgroup analysis, motor-cognitive training exerted significantly more improvement in global cognition and single gait speed when compared to either physical or cognitive training alone, or other control. Our results demonstrated the positive effects of motor-cognitive training on global cognition and gait speed in people with dementia. However, no significant improvements were observed in memory, attention, or executive function.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"24915"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12246404/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of motor-cognitive training on cognitive function and gait performance in older adults with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Wei-Han Weng, Nai-Chen Yeh, Yea-Ru Yang, Ray-Yau Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-09582-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Motor-cognitive training combines motor and cognitive tasks during the training. So far, its effectiveness on cognitive function and gait in people with dementia remains unknown, and whether it is superior to single physical or cognitive training has yet to be investigated. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to explore the effects of motor-cognitive training on cognitive function and gait in people with dementia. Randomized controlled trials comparing motor-cognitive training with cognitive intervention alone, physical exercise alone, or other control group programs were included. Outcomes included cognitive functions and single/dual task gait performance. We conducted subgroup analysis based on the type of intervention applied in the control group. The pooled meta-analysis showed significant improvements following motor-cognitive training compared to control interventions in global cognition (SMD = 1.00, 95% CI 0.75, 1.26, p < 0.00001), single gait speed (SMD = 0.4, 95% CI 0.19, 0.61, p = 0.0002), and dual-task gait speed (SMD = 0.28, 95% CI 0.01, 0.55, p = 0.05). In the subgroup analysis, motor-cognitive training exerted significantly more improvement in global cognition and single gait speed when compared to either physical or cognitive training alone, or other control. Our results demonstrated the positive effects of motor-cognitive training on global cognition and gait speed in people with dementia. However, no significant improvements were observed in memory, attention, or executive function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"24915\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12246404/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-09582-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-09582-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
运动-认知训练在训练过程中将运动和认知任务结合起来。到目前为止,它对痴呆症患者认知功能和步态的影响尚不清楚,它是否优于单一的身体或认知训练还有待研究。因此,本荟萃分析旨在探讨运动认知训练对痴呆患者认知功能和步态的影响。将运动认知训练与单独的认知干预、单独的体育锻炼或其他对照组项目进行比较的随机对照试验包括在内。结果包括认知功能和单/双任务步态表现。我们根据对照组的干预方式进行亚组分析。综合荟萃分析显示,与对照干预相比,运动认知训练在整体认知方面有显著改善(SMD = 1.00, 95% CI 0.75, 1.26, p
Effects of motor-cognitive training on cognitive function and gait performance in older adults with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Motor-cognitive training combines motor and cognitive tasks during the training. So far, its effectiveness on cognitive function and gait in people with dementia remains unknown, and whether it is superior to single physical or cognitive training has yet to be investigated. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to explore the effects of motor-cognitive training on cognitive function and gait in people with dementia. Randomized controlled trials comparing motor-cognitive training with cognitive intervention alone, physical exercise alone, or other control group programs were included. Outcomes included cognitive functions and single/dual task gait performance. We conducted subgroup analysis based on the type of intervention applied in the control group. The pooled meta-analysis showed significant improvements following motor-cognitive training compared to control interventions in global cognition (SMD = 1.00, 95% CI 0.75, 1.26, p < 0.00001), single gait speed (SMD = 0.4, 95% CI 0.19, 0.61, p = 0.0002), and dual-task gait speed (SMD = 0.28, 95% CI 0.01, 0.55, p = 0.05). In the subgroup analysis, motor-cognitive training exerted significantly more improvement in global cognition and single gait speed when compared to either physical or cognitive training alone, or other control. Our results demonstrated the positive effects of motor-cognitive training on global cognition and gait speed in people with dementia. However, no significant improvements were observed in memory, attention, or executive function.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.