疼痛治疗中的分级平衡:基于回避-耐力模型的基于风险因素的方法。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Schmerz Pub Date : 2025-07-10 DOI:10.1007/s00482-025-00893-7
M I Hasenbring, C Titze
{"title":"疼痛治疗中的分级平衡:基于回避-耐力模型的基于风险因素的方法。","authors":"M I Hasenbring, C Titze","doi":"10.1007/s00482-025-00893-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is one of the most frequently used and effective procedures in pain psychotherapy. Nevertheless, meta-analyses exhibit significant variability in response to treatment. Graded balance interventions (GBI) are among the CBT measures with a specific indication for pain patients who, according to the avoidance-endurance model (AEM), exhibit dysfunctional pain processing with respect to fear-avoidant or suppressive pain responses.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The article presents the individual treatment approach of GBI, which is aimed at patients with subacute or chronic pain and an AEM-based dysfunctional pattern of pain processing. Based on the goal of enabling those affected to flexibly alternate between short-term relaxation and resumption of the respective activity with simultaneous pain relief, the concrete procedure is outlined as a model, illustrated by a case study and the preliminary empirical evidence is presented.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on selected empirical literature and clinical case reports, the approach of a modular form of CBT is presented, which, guided by a self-reported screening on pain processing, opens up an individually targeted psychological procedure that can effectively support medical measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on a large number of randomized, controlled clinical trials on the efficacy of CBT in patients with chronic pain in different locations, a first randomized long-term study with individually targeted GBI shows superiority over a standardized procedure in terms of reduction of pain intensity, impairment and emotional distress in patients with subacute radicular pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of GBI opens the way to individualization and thus greater homogenization of the approach, based on contrasting patterns of affective, cognitive and behavioral pain processing. The findings to date provide initial indications of the long-term effectiveness of GBI, although there is still a great need for research with respect to its superiority over generalized CBT and into assumed mechanisms of action.</p>","PeriodicalId":21572,"journal":{"name":"Schmerz","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Graded balance in pain therapy : Risk factor-based approaches based on the avoidance-endurance model].\",\"authors\":\"M I Hasenbring, C Titze\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00482-025-00893-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is one of the most frequently used and effective procedures in pain psychotherapy. Nevertheless, meta-analyses exhibit significant variability in response to treatment. Graded balance interventions (GBI) are among the CBT measures with a specific indication for pain patients who, according to the avoidance-endurance model (AEM), exhibit dysfunctional pain processing with respect to fear-avoidant or suppressive pain responses.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The article presents the individual treatment approach of GBI, which is aimed at patients with subacute or chronic pain and an AEM-based dysfunctional pattern of pain processing. Based on the goal of enabling those affected to flexibly alternate between short-term relaxation and resumption of the respective activity with simultaneous pain relief, the concrete procedure is outlined as a model, illustrated by a case study and the preliminary empirical evidence is presented.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on selected empirical literature and clinical case reports, the approach of a modular form of CBT is presented, which, guided by a self-reported screening on pain processing, opens up an individually targeted psychological procedure that can effectively support medical measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on a large number of randomized, controlled clinical trials on the efficacy of CBT in patients with chronic pain in different locations, a first randomized long-term study with individually targeted GBI shows superiority over a standardized procedure in terms of reduction of pain intensity, impairment and emotional distress in patients with subacute radicular pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of GBI opens the way to individualization and thus greater homogenization of the approach, based on contrasting patterns of affective, cognitive and behavioral pain processing. The findings to date provide initial indications of the long-term effectiveness of GBI, although there is still a great need for research with respect to its superiority over generalized CBT and into assumed mechanisms of action.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Schmerz\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Schmerz\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00482-025-00893-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schmerz","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00482-025-00893-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:认知行为疗法(CBT)是疼痛心理治疗中最常用和最有效的方法之一。然而,荟萃分析显示对治疗的反应有显著的可变性。分级平衡干预(GBI)是一种针对疼痛患者的CBT措施,根据回避-耐力模型(AEM),这些患者在恐惧回避或抑制性疼痛反应方面表现出功能失调的疼痛处理。目的:本文介绍了GBI的个体治疗方法,该方法针对亚急性或慢性疼痛患者和基于aem的疼痛处理功能障碍模式。基于使受影响的患者能够灵活地在短期放松和恢复各自的活动之间交替,同时缓解疼痛的目标,具体的过程被概述为一个模型,通过一个案例研究和初步的经验证据提出。方法:基于选定的经验文献和临床病例报告,提出了一种模块化形式的CBT方法,该方法在自我报告的疼痛处理筛选的指导下,开辟了一种个性化的有针对性的心理程序,可以有效地支持医疗措施。结果:基于对不同部位慢性疼痛患者CBT疗效的大量随机对照临床试验,首个单独靶向GBI的随机长期研究显示,在减轻亚急性神经根性疼痛患者的疼痛强度、损伤和情绪困扰方面,CBT优于标准化程序。结论:基于情感、认知和行为疼痛处理的对比模式,GBI的使用为个性化开辟了道路,从而使治疗方法更加同质化。迄今为止的研究结果提供了GBI长期有效性的初步迹象,尽管仍有很大的需要研究其优于广义CBT和假设的作用机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Graded balance in pain therapy : Risk factor-based approaches based on the avoidance-endurance model].

Background: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is one of the most frequently used and effective procedures in pain psychotherapy. Nevertheless, meta-analyses exhibit significant variability in response to treatment. Graded balance interventions (GBI) are among the CBT measures with a specific indication for pain patients who, according to the avoidance-endurance model (AEM), exhibit dysfunctional pain processing with respect to fear-avoidant or suppressive pain responses.

Aim: The article presents the individual treatment approach of GBI, which is aimed at patients with subacute or chronic pain and an AEM-based dysfunctional pattern of pain processing. Based on the goal of enabling those affected to flexibly alternate between short-term relaxation and resumption of the respective activity with simultaneous pain relief, the concrete procedure is outlined as a model, illustrated by a case study and the preliminary empirical evidence is presented.

Methods: Based on selected empirical literature and clinical case reports, the approach of a modular form of CBT is presented, which, guided by a self-reported screening on pain processing, opens up an individually targeted psychological procedure that can effectively support medical measures.

Results: Based on a large number of randomized, controlled clinical trials on the efficacy of CBT in patients with chronic pain in different locations, a first randomized long-term study with individually targeted GBI shows superiority over a standardized procedure in terms of reduction of pain intensity, impairment and emotional distress in patients with subacute radicular pain.

Conclusion: The use of GBI opens the way to individualization and thus greater homogenization of the approach, based on contrasting patterns of affective, cognitive and behavioral pain processing. The findings to date provide initial indications of the long-term effectiveness of GBI, although there is still a great need for research with respect to its superiority over generalized CBT and into assumed mechanisms of action.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Schmerz
Schmerz 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Schmerz is an internationally recognized journal and addresses all scientists, practitioners and psychologists, dealing with the treatment of pain patients or working in pain research. The aim of the journal is to enhance the treatment of pain patients in the long run. Review articles provide an overview on selected topics and offer the reader a summary of current findings from all fields of pain research, pain management and pain symptom management. Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of important clinical studies and serve the scientific exchange. Case reports feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信