等待创伤治疗的儿童和成人的摄入前损耗。

IF 1.8 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Caitlin Rancher, Owen Winters, Emily Tilstra-Ferell, Austen McGuire, Megan M Wallace, Alyssa A Rheingold, Daniel W Smith
{"title":"等待创伤治疗的儿童和成人的摄入前损耗。","authors":"Caitlin Rancher, Owen Winters, Emily Tilstra-Ferell, Austen McGuire, Megan M Wallace, Alyssa A Rheingold, Daniel W Smith","doi":"10.1037/ser0000973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Exposure to trauma is a pervasive stressor that globally impacts millions of children and adults and can lead to severe adjustment problems. Although receiving evidence-based trauma-focused mental health treatment can effectively reduce distress associated with exposure to trauma, over half of those who schedule an intake session fail to attend, known as preintake attrition. Understanding factors that predict preintake attrition is essential for improving clinical care and triaging the allocation of clinic resources. This study examined clinic archival data sourced from an outpatient training clinic that focuses on delivering evidence-based trauma treatment. Data included records from 249 clients (<i>n</i> = 96 children; <i>n</i> = 153 adults) who completed a phone screen at the clinic between January 2022 and December 2023. Of the 249 total clients placed on the clinic waitlist, 52% (<i>n</i> = 129) attended their intake appointment. Results indicated that certain factors assessed during the initial phone screen (demographic characteristics, index trauma, and referral source) predicted preintake attrition. Notably, waitlist duration also emerged as a predictor of attrition; children who did not attend their intake spent nearly twice as many days on the waitlist compared with children who attended their intake. These findings provide insight into predictors of preintake attrition and suggest potential targets for developing strategies to increase engagement in trauma-focused treatment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12252188/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preintake attrition among children and adults waiting for trauma-focused treatment.\",\"authors\":\"Caitlin Rancher, Owen Winters, Emily Tilstra-Ferell, Austen McGuire, Megan M Wallace, Alyssa A Rheingold, Daniel W Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/ser0000973\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Exposure to trauma is a pervasive stressor that globally impacts millions of children and adults and can lead to severe adjustment problems. Although receiving evidence-based trauma-focused mental health treatment can effectively reduce distress associated with exposure to trauma, over half of those who schedule an intake session fail to attend, known as preintake attrition. Understanding factors that predict preintake attrition is essential for improving clinical care and triaging the allocation of clinic resources. This study examined clinic archival data sourced from an outpatient training clinic that focuses on delivering evidence-based trauma treatment. Data included records from 249 clients (<i>n</i> = 96 children; <i>n</i> = 153 adults) who completed a phone screen at the clinic between January 2022 and December 2023. Of the 249 total clients placed on the clinic waitlist, 52% (<i>n</i> = 129) attended their intake appointment. Results indicated that certain factors assessed during the initial phone screen (demographic characteristics, index trauma, and referral source) predicted preintake attrition. Notably, waitlist duration also emerged as a predictor of attrition; children who did not attend their intake spent nearly twice as many days on the waitlist compared with children who attended their intake. These findings provide insight into predictors of preintake attrition and suggest potential targets for developing strategies to increase engagement in trauma-focused treatment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological Services\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12252188/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000973\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Services","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000973","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

创伤是一种普遍存在的压力源,影响着全球数百万儿童和成人,并可能导致严重的适应问题。尽管接受以证据为基础的以创伤为重点的心理健康治疗可以有效地减少与创伤暴露相关的痛苦,但超过一半的计划接受治疗的人没有参加,这被称为摄入前损耗。了解预测摄入前消耗的因素对于改善临床护理和分配临床资源至关重要。本研究检查了来自门诊培训诊所的临床档案数据,该诊所专注于提供循证创伤治疗。数据包括249名客户的记录(n = 96名儿童;n = 153名成年人),他们在2022年1月至2023年12月期间在诊所完成了电话筛查。在诊所等待名单上的249名总客户中,52% (n = 129)参加了他们的入院预约。结果表明,在最初的电话筛查中评估的某些因素(人口统计学特征、指数创伤和转诊来源)预测了摄入前的磨损。值得注意的是,候补名单的持续时间也成为了人员流失的一个预测指标;没有参加入学考试的孩子在等待名单上的时间几乎是参加入学考试的孩子的两倍。这些发现提供了对摄入前磨损的预测因素的见解,并提出了开发策略以增加以创伤为重点的治疗的潜在目标。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preintake attrition among children and adults waiting for trauma-focused treatment.

Exposure to trauma is a pervasive stressor that globally impacts millions of children and adults and can lead to severe adjustment problems. Although receiving evidence-based trauma-focused mental health treatment can effectively reduce distress associated with exposure to trauma, over half of those who schedule an intake session fail to attend, known as preintake attrition. Understanding factors that predict preintake attrition is essential for improving clinical care and triaging the allocation of clinic resources. This study examined clinic archival data sourced from an outpatient training clinic that focuses on delivering evidence-based trauma treatment. Data included records from 249 clients (n = 96 children; n = 153 adults) who completed a phone screen at the clinic between January 2022 and December 2023. Of the 249 total clients placed on the clinic waitlist, 52% (n = 129) attended their intake appointment. Results indicated that certain factors assessed during the initial phone screen (demographic characteristics, index trauma, and referral source) predicted preintake attrition. Notably, waitlist duration also emerged as a predictor of attrition; children who did not attend their intake spent nearly twice as many days on the waitlist compared with children who attended their intake. These findings provide insight into predictors of preintake attrition and suggest potential targets for developing strategies to increase engagement in trauma-focused treatment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Services
Psychological Services PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
216
期刊介绍: Psychological Services publishes high-quality data-based articles on the broad range of psychological services. While the Division"s focus is on psychologists in "public service," usually defined as being employed by a governmental agency, Psychological Services covers the full range of psychological services provided in any service delivery setting. Psychological Services encourages submission of papers that focus on broad issues related to psychotherapy outcomes, evaluations of psychological service programs and systems, and public policy analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信