Nicholas A Pierorazio, Bethany L Brand, Julie Goldenson
{"title":"分离知情评估:与过程相关的指导。","authors":"Nicholas A Pierorazio, Bethany L Brand, Julie Goldenson","doi":"10.1037/tra0001997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There is a lack of training about how to recognize, assess, and treat trauma-related dissociation-a phenomenon that is prevalent in individuals with histories of complex trauma. This lack of training can cause mental health professionals to overlook dissociation, which can lead to underdetection, misdiagnosis, and possible prolonged suffering and misdirected treatment. Professionals seeking to improve their capacity to work effectively with clients with dissociation may face a paucity of training opportunities, particularly with respect to assessing trauma-related dissociation.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This article provides process-level guidance for helpfully engaging clients who experience trauma-related dissociation, recognizing persistent dissociation, and noticing and managing dissociation as it arises during assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We emphasize the mental health professional's stance. We also review a variety of methods to detect and assess trauma-related dissociation, including behavioral observations and process-oriented questions and reflections, highlighting the complexity of dissociation-informed assessments, not only in treatment settings but also when these assessments are required for third-party evaluations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We make a case for the vital importance of considering process-related issues not only in the treatment of dissociation but also in assessment. We argue that for best clinical assessment and treatment, training should emphasize collaborative rapport-building, professional reflexivity, and cultural responsiveness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20982,"journal":{"name":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dissociation-informed assessment: Process-related guidance.\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas A Pierorazio, Bethany L Brand, Julie Goldenson\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/tra0001997\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There is a lack of training about how to recognize, assess, and treat trauma-related dissociation-a phenomenon that is prevalent in individuals with histories of complex trauma. This lack of training can cause mental health professionals to overlook dissociation, which can lead to underdetection, misdiagnosis, and possible prolonged suffering and misdirected treatment. Professionals seeking to improve their capacity to work effectively with clients with dissociation may face a paucity of training opportunities, particularly with respect to assessing trauma-related dissociation.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This article provides process-level guidance for helpfully engaging clients who experience trauma-related dissociation, recognizing persistent dissociation, and noticing and managing dissociation as it arises during assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We emphasize the mental health professional's stance. We also review a variety of methods to detect and assess trauma-related dissociation, including behavioral observations and process-oriented questions and reflections, highlighting the complexity of dissociation-informed assessments, not only in treatment settings but also when these assessments are required for third-party evaluations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We make a case for the vital importance of considering process-related issues not only in the treatment of dissociation but also in assessment. We argue that for best clinical assessment and treatment, training should emphasize collaborative rapport-building, professional reflexivity, and cultural responsiveness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001997\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001997","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:缺乏关于如何识别、评估和治疗创伤相关分离的培训,这是一种普遍存在于有复杂创伤史的个体中的现象。这种培训的缺乏会导致精神卫生专业人员忽视精神分离,这可能导致发现不足、误诊,并可能延长痛苦和误导治疗。寻求提高与精神分离患者有效合作能力的专业人员可能面临缺乏培训机会的问题,特别是在评估与创伤有关的精神分离方面。方法:本文提供了过程层面的指导,以帮助那些经历创伤相关分离的客户,识别持续的分离,并在评估过程中注意和管理分离。结果:强调心理健康专业人员的立场。我们还回顾了各种检测和评估创伤相关分离的方法,包括行为观察和以过程为导向的问题和反思,强调了分离知情评估的复杂性,不仅在治疗环境中,而且当这些评估需要第三方评估时。结论:我们提出的情况下,考虑过程相关的问题至关重要,不仅在治疗分离,而且在评估。我们认为,为了获得最佳的临床评估和治疗,培训应强调合作关系的建立、专业反思和文化反应。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
Objective: There is a lack of training about how to recognize, assess, and treat trauma-related dissociation-a phenomenon that is prevalent in individuals with histories of complex trauma. This lack of training can cause mental health professionals to overlook dissociation, which can lead to underdetection, misdiagnosis, and possible prolonged suffering and misdirected treatment. Professionals seeking to improve their capacity to work effectively with clients with dissociation may face a paucity of training opportunities, particularly with respect to assessing trauma-related dissociation.
Method: This article provides process-level guidance for helpfully engaging clients who experience trauma-related dissociation, recognizing persistent dissociation, and noticing and managing dissociation as it arises during assessment.
Results: We emphasize the mental health professional's stance. We also review a variety of methods to detect and assess trauma-related dissociation, including behavioral observations and process-oriented questions and reflections, highlighting the complexity of dissociation-informed assessments, not only in treatment settings but also when these assessments are required for third-party evaluations.
Conclusions: We make a case for the vital importance of considering process-related issues not only in the treatment of dissociation but also in assessment. We argue that for best clinical assessment and treatment, training should emphasize collaborative rapport-building, professional reflexivity, and cultural responsiveness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy publishes empirical research on the psychological effects of trauma. The journal is intended to be a forum for an interdisciplinary discussion on trauma, blending science, theory, practice, and policy.
The journal publishes empirical research on a wide range of trauma-related topics, including:
-Psychological treatments and effects
-Promotion of education about effects of and treatment for trauma
-Assessment and diagnosis of trauma
-Pathophysiology of trauma reactions
-Health services (delivery of services to trauma populations)
-Epidemiological studies and risk factor studies
-Neuroimaging studies
-Trauma and cultural competence