增强未破裂颅内动脉瘤治疗的决策策略:一种使用分期、ELAPSS和uats评分预测显微外科夹持结果的新分析方法。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Philipp A Geiger, Christian Preuss-Hernandez, Nikolaus Kögl, Jeannine Rey, Claudius Thomé, Ondra Petr
{"title":"增强未破裂颅内动脉瘤治疗的决策策略:一种使用分期、ELAPSS和uats评分预测显微外科夹持结果的新分析方法。","authors":"Philipp A Geiger, Christian Preuss-Hernandez, Nikolaus Kögl, Jeannine Rey, Claudius Thomé, Ondra Petr","doi":"10.1007/s10143-025-03683-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA) is complex, balancing the risks of surgical intervention against aneurysm rupture. The PHASES, ELAPSS, and UIATS scoring systems have been developed to assist in clinical decision-making, but their efficacy in predicting surgical outcome remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this monocentric, retrospective, observational study, we included 380 patients with UIA from January 2010 to January 2021. We assessed the predictive value of the PHASES, ELAPSS, and UIATS scores in determining clinical outcome post-surgery, including different variables. Statistical analyses, including Principal Component Analysis and Multiple logistic and linear regression, were employed to analyze the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our cohort of 380 predominantly female patients (71.3%) had a mean age of 54.7 years. The PHASES and UIATS pro-conservative scores were significant predictors of poor clinical outcome (p = 0.03 and p = 0.04, respectively), while the ELAPSS score was predictive of new neurological deficits post-surgery (p = 0.01). Aneurysm size was significantly associated with new neurological deficits but not with long-term clinical performance/outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study underscores the utility of PHASES, ELAPSS, and UIATS scores in preoperative risk stratifications. Conservative PHASES and UIATS scores were associated with poor outcome, therefore supporting their predictive value of non-operative management. Our findings suggest the routine implementation of these scores into clinical practice could improve the management of UIAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"559"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12246004/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing decision-making strategies in treatment for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a novel analytical approach using PHASES, ELAPSS and UIATS scores for microsurgical clipping outcome prediction.\",\"authors\":\"Philipp A Geiger, Christian Preuss-Hernandez, Nikolaus Kögl, Jeannine Rey, Claudius Thomé, Ondra Petr\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10143-025-03683-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA) is complex, balancing the risks of surgical intervention against aneurysm rupture. The PHASES, ELAPSS, and UIATS scoring systems have been developed to assist in clinical decision-making, but their efficacy in predicting surgical outcome remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this monocentric, retrospective, observational study, we included 380 patients with UIA from January 2010 to January 2021. We assessed the predictive value of the PHASES, ELAPSS, and UIATS scores in determining clinical outcome post-surgery, including different variables. Statistical analyses, including Principal Component Analysis and Multiple logistic and linear regression, were employed to analyze the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our cohort of 380 predominantly female patients (71.3%) had a mean age of 54.7 years. The PHASES and UIATS pro-conservative scores were significant predictors of poor clinical outcome (p = 0.03 and p = 0.04, respectively), while the ELAPSS score was predictive of new neurological deficits post-surgery (p = 0.01). Aneurysm size was significantly associated with new neurological deficits but not with long-term clinical performance/outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study underscores the utility of PHASES, ELAPSS, and UIATS scores in preoperative risk stratifications. Conservative PHASES and UIATS scores were associated with poor outcome, therefore supporting their predictive value of non-operative management. Our findings suggest the routine implementation of these scores into clinical practice could improve the management of UIAs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurosurgical Review\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"559\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12246004/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurosurgical Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03683-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03683-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:未破裂颅内动脉瘤(UIA)的治疗是复杂的,需要权衡手术干预与动脉瘤破裂的风险。分期、ELAPSS和uats评分系统已被开发用于辅助临床决策,但它们在预测手术结果方面的功效尚不清楚。方法:在这项单中心、回顾性、观察性研究中,我们纳入了380例2010年1月至2021年1月的UIA患者。我们评估了分期、ELAPSS和uats评分在确定术后临床结果方面的预测价值,包括不同的变量。采用主成分分析、多元逻辑回归和线性回归等统计分析方法对数据进行分析。结果:我们的队列中有380例主要为女性患者(71.3%),平均年龄为54.7岁。分期和uats保守评分是不良临床预后的显著预测因子(分别为p = 0.03和p = 0.04),而ELAPSS评分可预测术后新的神经功能缺损(p = 0.01)。动脉瘤大小与新的神经功能缺损显著相关,但与长期临床表现/结果无关。结论:该研究强调了分期、ELAPSS和uats评分在术前风险分层中的作用。保守分期和uats评分与预后不良相关,因此支持其对非手术治疗的预测价值。我们的研究结果表明,在临床实践中常规实施这些评分可以改善uia的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing decision-making strategies in treatment for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a novel analytical approach using PHASES, ELAPSS and UIATS scores for microsurgical clipping outcome prediction.

Objective: The management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA) is complex, balancing the risks of surgical intervention against aneurysm rupture. The PHASES, ELAPSS, and UIATS scoring systems have been developed to assist in clinical decision-making, but their efficacy in predicting surgical outcome remains unclear.

Methods: In this monocentric, retrospective, observational study, we included 380 patients with UIA from January 2010 to January 2021. We assessed the predictive value of the PHASES, ELAPSS, and UIATS scores in determining clinical outcome post-surgery, including different variables. Statistical analyses, including Principal Component Analysis and Multiple logistic and linear regression, were employed to analyze the data.

Results: Our cohort of 380 predominantly female patients (71.3%) had a mean age of 54.7 years. The PHASES and UIATS pro-conservative scores were significant predictors of poor clinical outcome (p = 0.03 and p = 0.04, respectively), while the ELAPSS score was predictive of new neurological deficits post-surgery (p = 0.01). Aneurysm size was significantly associated with new neurological deficits but not with long-term clinical performance/outcome.

Conclusions: The study underscores the utility of PHASES, ELAPSS, and UIATS scores in preoperative risk stratifications. Conservative PHASES and UIATS scores were associated with poor outcome, therefore supporting their predictive value of non-operative management. Our findings suggest the routine implementation of these scores into clinical practice could improve the management of UIAs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信