一项以人为中心的液体依从性干预成人血液透析的可行性随机对照试验

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Nephron Pub Date : 2025-07-10 DOI:10.1159/000546103
Hemamali Jagodage, Ann Bonner, Amanda McGuire, Charrlotte Seib
{"title":"一项以人为中心的液体依从性干预成人血液透析的可行性随机对照试验","authors":"Hemamali Jagodage, Ann Bonner, Amanda McGuire, Charrlotte Seib","doi":"10.1159/000546103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Adherence to fluid restriction is an essential component of haemodialysis (HD) self-management, although educational interventions are rarely adjusted to meet a person's health literacy abilities. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a person-centred intervention to improve fluid adherence in adults receiving HD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pragmatic, clustered, randomised control feasibility trial involved adults receiving HD for at least 3 months. The control group received standard care while the intervention group received standard care plus a 12-week self-management program that included 4 face-to-face individual teach-back sessions. Randomisation was based on HD treatment shifts. Primary outcomes were acceptability and feasibility (recruitment, retention, and completion rates) and secondary outcomes included patient-reported measures (knowledge, self-efficacy, health literacy, health-related quality of life [HRQoL]) and clinical outcomes (interdialytic weight gain [IDWG] and blood pressure [BP]).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The recruitment rate was 53.2% (50/94 screened) with participants (mean age 51 years, SD = 12.52) randomly allocated to intervention (n = 25) and control groups (n = 25). Overall, patient-reported outcome completion rates at baseline and 12 weeks were 88% and 90%, respectively. Retention rates for the intervention and control groups were 96% and 92%, respectively. There were no between group differences at baseline. At 12 weeks, significant improvements were found in the intervention group for knowledge, self-efficacy, health literacy, self-care index, and IDWG, but not HRQoL. The study found mixed results for BP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This intervention was feasible and acceptable to deliver in the clinical setting during HD treatment and has the potential to improve health outcomes for adults on HD.</p>","PeriodicalId":18998,"journal":{"name":"Nephron","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Feasibility Cluster Randomised Control Trial of a Person-Centred Fluid Adherence Intervention for Adults Receiving Haemodialysis.\",\"authors\":\"Hemamali Jagodage, Ann Bonner, Amanda McGuire, Charrlotte Seib\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000546103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Adherence to fluid restriction is an essential component of haemodialysis (HD) self-management, although educational interventions are rarely adjusted to meet a person's health literacy abilities. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a person-centred intervention to improve fluid adherence in adults receiving HD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pragmatic, clustered, randomised control feasibility trial involved adults receiving HD for at least 3 months. The control group received standard care while the intervention group received standard care plus a 12-week self-management program that included 4 face-to-face individual teach-back sessions. Randomisation was based on HD treatment shifts. Primary outcomes were acceptability and feasibility (recruitment, retention, and completion rates) and secondary outcomes included patient-reported measures (knowledge, self-efficacy, health literacy, health-related quality of life [HRQoL]) and clinical outcomes (interdialytic weight gain [IDWG] and blood pressure [BP]).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The recruitment rate was 53.2% (50/94 screened) with participants (mean age 51 years, SD = 12.52) randomly allocated to intervention (n = 25) and control groups (n = 25). Overall, patient-reported outcome completion rates at baseline and 12 weeks were 88% and 90%, respectively. Retention rates for the intervention and control groups were 96% and 92%, respectively. There were no between group differences at baseline. At 12 weeks, significant improvements were found in the intervention group for knowledge, self-efficacy, health literacy, self-care index, and IDWG, but not HRQoL. The study found mixed results for BP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This intervention was feasible and acceptable to deliver in the clinical setting during HD treatment and has the potential to improve health outcomes for adults on HD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nephron\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nephron\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546103\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nephron","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546103","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:坚持液体限制是血液透析(HD)自我管理的重要组成部分,尽管教育干预很少调整以满足一个人的健康素养能力。本研究旨在评估以人为中心的干预措施改善成人HD患者液体依从性的可行性。方法:一项实用的、聚集的、随机对照的可行性试验,涉及接受HD治疗至少3个月的成年人。对照组接受标准治疗,干预组接受标准治疗,外加为期12周的自我管理项目,其中包括4次面对面的个别辅导。随机化是基于HD治疗班次。主要结局包括可接受性和可行性(招募率、保留率和完成率),次要结局包括患者报告的措施(知识、自我效能、健康素养、健康相关生活质量[HRQoL])和临床结局(透析期间体重增加[IDWG]和血压[BP])。结果:招募率为53.2%(50/94筛选),参与者(平均年龄51岁,SD = 12.52)随机分为干预组(n = 25)和对照组(n = 25)。总体而言,患者报告的基线和12周的结局完成率分别为88%和90%。干预组和对照组的保留率分别为96%和92%。在基线时两组间无差异。12周时,干预组在知识、自我效能、健康素养、自我保健指数和IDWG方面均有显著改善,但HRQoL无显著改善。研究发现英国石油公司的结果好坏参半。结论:该干预措施在HD治疗期间的临床环境中是可行和可接受的,并且有可能改善HD成人的健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Feasibility Cluster Randomised Control Trial of a Person-Centred Fluid Adherence Intervention for Adults Receiving Haemodialysis.

Introduction: Adherence to fluid restriction is an essential component of haemodialysis (HD) self-management, although educational interventions are rarely adjusted to meet a person's health literacy abilities. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a person-centred intervention to improve fluid adherence in adults receiving HD.

Methods: A pragmatic, clustered, randomised control feasibility trial involved adults receiving HD for at least 3 months. The control group received standard care while the intervention group received standard care plus a 12-week self-management program that included 4 face-to-face individual teach-back sessions. Randomisation was based on HD treatment shifts. Primary outcomes were acceptability and feasibility (recruitment, retention, and completion rates) and secondary outcomes included patient-reported measures (knowledge, self-efficacy, health literacy, health-related quality of life [HRQoL]) and clinical outcomes (interdialytic weight gain [IDWG] and blood pressure [BP]).

Results: The recruitment rate was 53.2% (50/94 screened) with participants (mean age 51 years, SD = 12.52) randomly allocated to intervention (n = 25) and control groups (n = 25). Overall, patient-reported outcome completion rates at baseline and 12 weeks were 88% and 90%, respectively. Retention rates for the intervention and control groups were 96% and 92%, respectively. There were no between group differences at baseline. At 12 weeks, significant improvements were found in the intervention group for knowledge, self-efficacy, health literacy, self-care index, and IDWG, but not HRQoL. The study found mixed results for BP.

Conclusion: This intervention was feasible and acceptable to deliver in the clinical setting during HD treatment and has the potential to improve health outcomes for adults on HD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nephron
Nephron UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: ''Nephron'' comprises three sections, which are each under the editorship of internationally recognized leaders and served by specialized Associate Editors. Apart from high-quality original research, ''Nephron'' publishes invited reviews/minireviews on up-to-date topics. Papers undergo an innovative and transparent peer review process encompassing a Presentation Report which assesses and summarizes the presentation of the paper in an unbiased and standardized way.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信