{"title":"完美vs实用:利用血液学薄片诊断疟原虫和巴贝斯虫。","authors":"Neil Anderson","doi":"10.1128/jcm.00644-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the manuscript entitled \"Hematology Thin Smears Perform Equally to Parasitology Thick and Thin Blood Smears for the Diagnosis of <i>Plasmodium</i> and <i>Babesia</i> in a Low-Prevalence Setting,\" the investigators demonstrate that traditional hematology smears (HS) review can have comparable performance to formal blood parasite smears (PS) review. The authors quote a 93.3% sensitivity in comparison to thick smears. This increases to 100% considering only new diagnoses. The implications are that HS can be utilized as a practical and rapid alternative to PS. For clinical laboratories that are limited to only HS capabilities, these findings suggest that they may be able to be less reliant on reference laboratory PS testing, allowing for more rapid diagnosis and management. Even in clinical laboratories that offer both tests, the findings suggest a reassessment of how both HS and PS fit into the diagnostic process for blood parasites. Familiarity with the pros and cons of both approaches allows them to be employed in a way that maximizes patient care impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0064425"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perfect vs practical: utilizing hematology thin smears for the diagnosis of <i>Plasmodium</i> and <i>Babesia</i>.\",\"authors\":\"Neil Anderson\",\"doi\":\"10.1128/jcm.00644-25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In the manuscript entitled \\\"Hematology Thin Smears Perform Equally to Parasitology Thick and Thin Blood Smears for the Diagnosis of <i>Plasmodium</i> and <i>Babesia</i> in a Low-Prevalence Setting,\\\" the investigators demonstrate that traditional hematology smears (HS) review can have comparable performance to formal blood parasite smears (PS) review. The authors quote a 93.3% sensitivity in comparison to thick smears. This increases to 100% considering only new diagnoses. The implications are that HS can be utilized as a practical and rapid alternative to PS. For clinical laboratories that are limited to only HS capabilities, these findings suggest that they may be able to be less reliant on reference laboratory PS testing, allowing for more rapid diagnosis and management. Even in clinical laboratories that offer both tests, the findings suggest a reassessment of how both HS and PS fit into the diagnostic process for blood parasites. Familiarity with the pros and cons of both approaches allows them to be employed in a way that maximizes patient care impact.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Microbiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e0064425\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00644-25\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00644-25","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Perfect vs practical: utilizing hematology thin smears for the diagnosis of Plasmodium and Babesia.
In the manuscript entitled "Hematology Thin Smears Perform Equally to Parasitology Thick and Thin Blood Smears for the Diagnosis of Plasmodium and Babesia in a Low-Prevalence Setting," the investigators demonstrate that traditional hematology smears (HS) review can have comparable performance to formal blood parasite smears (PS) review. The authors quote a 93.3% sensitivity in comparison to thick smears. This increases to 100% considering only new diagnoses. The implications are that HS can be utilized as a practical and rapid alternative to PS. For clinical laboratories that are limited to only HS capabilities, these findings suggest that they may be able to be less reliant on reference laboratory PS testing, allowing for more rapid diagnosis and management. Even in clinical laboratories that offer both tests, the findings suggest a reassessment of how both HS and PS fit into the diagnostic process for blood parasites. Familiarity with the pros and cons of both approaches allows them to be employed in a way that maximizes patient care impact.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Microbiology® disseminates the latest research concerning the laboratory diagnosis of human and animal infections, along with the laboratory's role in epidemiology and the management of infectious diseases.