完美vs实用:利用血液学薄片诊断疟原虫和巴贝斯虫。

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Neil Anderson
{"title":"完美vs实用:利用血液学薄片诊断疟原虫和巴贝斯虫。","authors":"Neil Anderson","doi":"10.1128/jcm.00644-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the manuscript entitled \"Hematology Thin Smears Perform Equally to Parasitology Thick and Thin Blood Smears for the Diagnosis of <i>Plasmodium</i> and <i>Babesia</i> in a Low-Prevalence Setting,\" the investigators demonstrate that traditional hematology smears (HS) review can have comparable performance to formal blood parasite smears (PS) review. The authors quote a 93.3% sensitivity in comparison to thick smears. This increases to 100% considering only new diagnoses. The implications are that HS can be utilized as a practical and rapid alternative to PS. For clinical laboratories that are limited to only HS capabilities, these findings suggest that they may be able to be less reliant on reference laboratory PS testing, allowing for more rapid diagnosis and management. Even in clinical laboratories that offer both tests, the findings suggest a reassessment of how both HS and PS fit into the diagnostic process for blood parasites. Familiarity with the pros and cons of both approaches allows them to be employed in a way that maximizes patient care impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0064425"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perfect vs practical: utilizing hematology thin smears for the diagnosis of <i>Plasmodium</i> and <i>Babesia</i>.\",\"authors\":\"Neil Anderson\",\"doi\":\"10.1128/jcm.00644-25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In the manuscript entitled \\\"Hematology Thin Smears Perform Equally to Parasitology Thick and Thin Blood Smears for the Diagnosis of <i>Plasmodium</i> and <i>Babesia</i> in a Low-Prevalence Setting,\\\" the investigators demonstrate that traditional hematology smears (HS) review can have comparable performance to formal blood parasite smears (PS) review. The authors quote a 93.3% sensitivity in comparison to thick smears. This increases to 100% considering only new diagnoses. The implications are that HS can be utilized as a practical and rapid alternative to PS. For clinical laboratories that are limited to only HS capabilities, these findings suggest that they may be able to be less reliant on reference laboratory PS testing, allowing for more rapid diagnosis and management. Even in clinical laboratories that offer both tests, the findings suggest a reassessment of how both HS and PS fit into the diagnostic process for blood parasites. Familiarity with the pros and cons of both approaches allows them to be employed in a way that maximizes patient care impact.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Microbiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e0064425\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00644-25\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00644-25","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在题为“血液学薄涂片与寄生虫学厚血涂片和薄血涂片在低流行环境中诊断疟原虫和巴贝虫的表现相同”的手稿中,研究人员证明,传统的血液学涂片(HS)审查可以与正式的血液寄生虫涂片(PS)审查具有相当的性能。作者引用了与厚涂片相比的93.3%的灵敏度。如果只考虑新诊断,这一比例将增加到100%。这意味着HS可以作为PS的一种实用和快速的替代方案。对于仅限HS能力的临床实验室,这些研究结果表明,他们可能能够减少对参考实验室PS检测的依赖,从而实现更快速的诊断和管理。即使在提供这两种检测的临床实验室中,研究结果也表明需要重新评估HS和PS如何适合血液寄生虫的诊断过程。熟悉这两种方法的优缺点,可以使它们以一种最大化患者护理影响的方式使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perfect vs practical: utilizing hematology thin smears for the diagnosis of Plasmodium and Babesia.

In the manuscript entitled "Hematology Thin Smears Perform Equally to Parasitology Thick and Thin Blood Smears for the Diagnosis of Plasmodium and Babesia in a Low-Prevalence Setting," the investigators demonstrate that traditional hematology smears (HS) review can have comparable performance to formal blood parasite smears (PS) review. The authors quote a 93.3% sensitivity in comparison to thick smears. This increases to 100% considering only new diagnoses. The implications are that HS can be utilized as a practical and rapid alternative to PS. For clinical laboratories that are limited to only HS capabilities, these findings suggest that they may be able to be less reliant on reference laboratory PS testing, allowing for more rapid diagnosis and management. Even in clinical laboratories that offer both tests, the findings suggest a reassessment of how both HS and PS fit into the diagnostic process for blood parasites. Familiarity with the pros and cons of both approaches allows them to be employed in a way that maximizes patient care impact.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Journal of Clinical Microbiology 医学-微生物学
CiteScore
17.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
347
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Microbiology® disseminates the latest research concerning the laboratory diagnosis of human and animal infections, along with the laboratory's role in epidemiology and the management of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信