利用EpiCC比较T细胞表位含量与猪生殖与呼吸综合征病毒2型株疫苗效力相关

IF 4 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Frontiers in Microbiology Pub Date : 2025-06-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2025.1625309
J Mark Hammer, Andres H Gutierrez, Lucas Huntimer, Benjamin Gabriel, William D Martin, Sabine E Hammer, Tobias Käser, Anne S De Groot
{"title":"利用EpiCC比较T细胞表位含量与猪生殖与呼吸综合征病毒2型株疫苗效力相关","authors":"J Mark Hammer, Andres H Gutierrez, Lucas Huntimer, Benjamin Gabriel, William D Martin, Sabine E Hammer, Tobias Käser, Anne S De Groot","doi":"10.3389/fmicb.2025.1625309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) is one of the most ubiquitous RNA viruses affecting pigs and pig farms globally. While vaccines are available, they are not entirely effective, and the introduction of modified live virus vaccines (MLV) has contributed to an increase in the rate of viral evolution. While vaccines induce humoral responses that may contribute to immunity against PRRSV, vaccines containing T cell epitopes that are well-matched to circulating strains are believed to be more likely to induce protective effects upon challenge or field exposure. We developed an algorithm that performs T cell epitope content comparison (EpiCC) based on PRRSV sequence data, that may assist veterinarians, practitioners, producers, and farmers to select and design well-matched vaccines for use against circulating PRRSV isolates. A recently published vaccination-challenge experiment provided an opportunity to test EpiCC. We hypothesized that higher conservation of T cell epitope content between the MLV vaccine and challenge viruses would be associated with better protective effects of vaccination. We used the EpiCC algorithm to compare the T cell epitope content contained in the MLV Prevacent<sup>®</sup> vaccine used in the study and four heterologous type 2 (PRRSV-2) challenge strains. In this comparison, higher EpiCC coverage scores correlated not only with higher T cell responses observed in the efficacy study but also with better protection. The results also indicate that while genotyping may currently depend on GP5 analysis, it is unlikely that the genotyping performed using GP5 will be closely associated with protective relationships between vaccines and lineages. This suggests T cell epitope analysis of existing and new vaccines for epitope coverage may improve vaccine selection for an economically important porcine virus; it also points to the need to measure and thus improve T cell epitope content in PRRSV vaccines to maximize their protective efficacy against field strains.</p>","PeriodicalId":12466,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Microbiology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1625309"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12241073/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"T cell epitope content comparison using EpiCC correlates with vaccine efficacy against heterologous porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus type 2 strains.\",\"authors\":\"J Mark Hammer, Andres H Gutierrez, Lucas Huntimer, Benjamin Gabriel, William D Martin, Sabine E Hammer, Tobias Käser, Anne S De Groot\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fmicb.2025.1625309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) is one of the most ubiquitous RNA viruses affecting pigs and pig farms globally. While vaccines are available, they are not entirely effective, and the introduction of modified live virus vaccines (MLV) has contributed to an increase in the rate of viral evolution. While vaccines induce humoral responses that may contribute to immunity against PRRSV, vaccines containing T cell epitopes that are well-matched to circulating strains are believed to be more likely to induce protective effects upon challenge or field exposure. We developed an algorithm that performs T cell epitope content comparison (EpiCC) based on PRRSV sequence data, that may assist veterinarians, practitioners, producers, and farmers to select and design well-matched vaccines for use against circulating PRRSV isolates. A recently published vaccination-challenge experiment provided an opportunity to test EpiCC. We hypothesized that higher conservation of T cell epitope content between the MLV vaccine and challenge viruses would be associated with better protective effects of vaccination. We used the EpiCC algorithm to compare the T cell epitope content contained in the MLV Prevacent<sup>®</sup> vaccine used in the study and four heterologous type 2 (PRRSV-2) challenge strains. In this comparison, higher EpiCC coverage scores correlated not only with higher T cell responses observed in the efficacy study but also with better protection. The results also indicate that while genotyping may currently depend on GP5 analysis, it is unlikely that the genotyping performed using GP5 will be closely associated with protective relationships between vaccines and lineages. This suggests T cell epitope analysis of existing and new vaccines for epitope coverage may improve vaccine selection for an economically important porcine virus; it also points to the need to measure and thus improve T cell epitope content in PRRSV vaccines to maximize their protective efficacy against field strains.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Microbiology\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1625309\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12241073/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1625309\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1625309","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

猪繁殖与呼吸综合征病毒(PRRSV)是影响全球猪和猪场的最普遍的RNA病毒之一。虽然有疫苗,但它们并不完全有效,改良活病毒疫苗(MLV)的引入促进了病毒进化的速度。虽然疫苗诱导的体液反应可能有助于对PRRSV的免疫,但含有与循环毒株匹配良好的T细胞表位的疫苗被认为更有可能在挑战或现场暴露时诱导保护作用。我们开发了一种基于PRRSV序列数据进行T细胞表位含量比较(EpiCC)的算法,可以帮助兽医、从业人员、生产者和农民选择和设计匹配良好的疫苗,用于对抗流行的PRRSV分离株。最近发表的一项疫苗接种挑战实验提供了测试EpiCC的机会。我们假设,MLV疫苗和攻击病毒之间T细胞表位含量的较高保守性与疫苗接种的更好保护作用有关。我们使用EpiCC算法比较了研究中使用的MLV Prevacent®疫苗和四种异源2型(PRRSV-2)攻击株中T细胞表位的含量。在这个比较中,较高的EpiCC覆盖率评分不仅与疗效研究中观察到的更高的T细胞应答相关,而且与更好的保护相关。结果还表明,虽然基因分型目前可能依赖于GP5分析,但使用GP5进行的基因分型不太可能与疫苗和谱系之间的保护关系密切相关。这表明T细胞表位分析现有疫苗和新疫苗的表位覆盖范围可以改善疫苗选择对经济上重要的猪病毒;它还指出需要测量并因此提高PRRSV疫苗中T细胞表位的含量,以最大限度地提高其对野毒株的保护功效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
T cell epitope content comparison using EpiCC correlates with vaccine efficacy against heterologous porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus type 2 strains.

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) is one of the most ubiquitous RNA viruses affecting pigs and pig farms globally. While vaccines are available, they are not entirely effective, and the introduction of modified live virus vaccines (MLV) has contributed to an increase in the rate of viral evolution. While vaccines induce humoral responses that may contribute to immunity against PRRSV, vaccines containing T cell epitopes that are well-matched to circulating strains are believed to be more likely to induce protective effects upon challenge or field exposure. We developed an algorithm that performs T cell epitope content comparison (EpiCC) based on PRRSV sequence data, that may assist veterinarians, practitioners, producers, and farmers to select and design well-matched vaccines for use against circulating PRRSV isolates. A recently published vaccination-challenge experiment provided an opportunity to test EpiCC. We hypothesized that higher conservation of T cell epitope content between the MLV vaccine and challenge viruses would be associated with better protective effects of vaccination. We used the EpiCC algorithm to compare the T cell epitope content contained in the MLV Prevacent® vaccine used in the study and four heterologous type 2 (PRRSV-2) challenge strains. In this comparison, higher EpiCC coverage scores correlated not only with higher T cell responses observed in the efficacy study but also with better protection. The results also indicate that while genotyping may currently depend on GP5 analysis, it is unlikely that the genotyping performed using GP5 will be closely associated with protective relationships between vaccines and lineages. This suggests T cell epitope analysis of existing and new vaccines for epitope coverage may improve vaccine selection for an economically important porcine virus; it also points to the need to measure and thus improve T cell epitope content in PRRSV vaccines to maximize their protective efficacy against field strains.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
9.60%
发文量
4837
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Microbiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the entire spectrum of microbiology. Field Chief Editor Martin G. Klotz at Washington State University is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信