你在想什么?大麻期望与使用行为之间的关系取决于大麻的自我归属方式和类型。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-10 DOI:10.1037/pha0000789
Jack T Waddell
{"title":"你在想什么?大麻期望与使用行为之间的关系取决于大麻的自我归属方式和类型。","authors":"Jack T Waddell","doi":"10.1037/pha0000789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Self-report is the most common way to measure substance use expectancies. Using such measures has led to insights regarding how, why, and for whom expectancies relate to use behavior. In fact, such insights have translated into interventions, such as expectancy challenges seeking to change one's expectancies. However, expectancy measures may be tricky for cannabis use, which has several product types and modalities that may impact the introspection of self-reported cannabis experiences. This study assessed whether a modern expectancies measure was invariant across cannabis use type/modality self-reported upon and whether cannabis type/modality moderated the influence of expectancies on use behavior. Young adults who recreationally used cannabis (<i>N</i> = 387) reported their cannabis use frequency and expectancies via the Anticipated Effects of Cannabis Scale. Participants also reported cannabis modality/type through which expectancies were self-reported upon. Each expectancy domain (high arousal negative, low arousal negative, positive) was invariant across cannabis type/modality. High arousal negative expectancies were higher when reporting vaping versus smoking, and positive expectancies were higher when reporting smoking versus vaping, but no other differences emerged. However, positive expectancies were associated with more frequent cannabis use when reporting on smoked (vs. vaporized) cannabis, and high arousal negative expectancies were associated with less frequent cannabis use when reporting on hash oil (vs. marijuana) and when reporting on vaporized (vs. smoked) cannabis. Cannabis type and modality may be important qualifiers in self-report research on cannabis expectancies. Future research should consider assessing modality- and type-specific cannabis constructs that are susceptible to such influences. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":12089,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"523-530"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What were you thinking? Relations between cannabis expectancies and use behavior depend upon self-attributed modality and type of cannabis.\",\"authors\":\"Jack T Waddell\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/pha0000789\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Self-report is the most common way to measure substance use expectancies. Using such measures has led to insights regarding how, why, and for whom expectancies relate to use behavior. In fact, such insights have translated into interventions, such as expectancy challenges seeking to change one's expectancies. However, expectancy measures may be tricky for cannabis use, which has several product types and modalities that may impact the introspection of self-reported cannabis experiences. This study assessed whether a modern expectancies measure was invariant across cannabis use type/modality self-reported upon and whether cannabis type/modality moderated the influence of expectancies on use behavior. Young adults who recreationally used cannabis (<i>N</i> = 387) reported their cannabis use frequency and expectancies via the Anticipated Effects of Cannabis Scale. Participants also reported cannabis modality/type through which expectancies were self-reported upon. Each expectancy domain (high arousal negative, low arousal negative, positive) was invariant across cannabis type/modality. High arousal negative expectancies were higher when reporting vaping versus smoking, and positive expectancies were higher when reporting smoking versus vaping, but no other differences emerged. However, positive expectancies were associated with more frequent cannabis use when reporting on smoked (vs. vaporized) cannabis, and high arousal negative expectancies were associated with less frequent cannabis use when reporting on hash oil (vs. marijuana) and when reporting on vaporized (vs. smoked) cannabis. Cannabis type and modality may be important qualifiers in self-report research on cannabis expectancies. Future research should consider assessing modality- and type-specific cannabis constructs that are susceptible to such influences. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"523-530\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/pha0000789\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pha0000789","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自我报告是衡量药物使用预期的最常见方法。使用这样的度量方法可以深入了解期望如何、为什么以及为谁与使用行为相关。事实上,这些见解已经转化为干预措施,例如寻求改变一个人的期望的期望挑战。然而,对大麻使用的预期测量可能很棘手,因为大麻使用有几种产品类型和方式,可能会影响自我报告的大麻体验的内省。本研究评估了现代期望测量是否在自我报告的大麻使用类型/方式中是不变的,以及大麻类型/方式是否缓和了期望对使用行为的影响。娱乐性使用大麻的年轻人(N = 387)通过大麻预期效应量表报告了他们使用大麻的频率和预期。参与者还报告了自我报告期望的大麻方式/类型。每个期望域(高唤醒负、低唤醒负、正)在大麻类型/模式中是不变的。当报告吸电子烟比吸烟时,高唤醒的负面期望更高,当报告吸烟比吸电子烟时,积极期望更高,但没有出现其他差异。然而,当报告吸烟(与气化)大麻时,积极的预期与更频繁地使用大麻有关,当报告大麻油(与大麻相比)和报告气化(与吸烟)大麻时,高唤醒的消极预期与更少的大麻使用有关。大麻类型和方式可能是大麻期望自我报告研究中的重要限定词。未来的研究应考虑评估易受此类影响的特定模式和类型的大麻结构。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What were you thinking? Relations between cannabis expectancies and use behavior depend upon self-attributed modality and type of cannabis.

Self-report is the most common way to measure substance use expectancies. Using such measures has led to insights regarding how, why, and for whom expectancies relate to use behavior. In fact, such insights have translated into interventions, such as expectancy challenges seeking to change one's expectancies. However, expectancy measures may be tricky for cannabis use, which has several product types and modalities that may impact the introspection of self-reported cannabis experiences. This study assessed whether a modern expectancies measure was invariant across cannabis use type/modality self-reported upon and whether cannabis type/modality moderated the influence of expectancies on use behavior. Young adults who recreationally used cannabis (N = 387) reported their cannabis use frequency and expectancies via the Anticipated Effects of Cannabis Scale. Participants also reported cannabis modality/type through which expectancies were self-reported upon. Each expectancy domain (high arousal negative, low arousal negative, positive) was invariant across cannabis type/modality. High arousal negative expectancies were higher when reporting vaping versus smoking, and positive expectancies were higher when reporting smoking versus vaping, but no other differences emerged. However, positive expectancies were associated with more frequent cannabis use when reporting on smoked (vs. vaporized) cannabis, and high arousal negative expectancies were associated with less frequent cannabis use when reporting on hash oil (vs. marijuana) and when reporting on vaporized (vs. smoked) cannabis. Cannabis type and modality may be important qualifiers in self-report research on cannabis expectancies. Future research should consider assessing modality- and type-specific cannabis constructs that are susceptible to such influences. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
164
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology publishes advances in translational and interdisciplinary research on psychopharmacology, broadly defined, and/or substance abuse.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信