过敏原免疫治疗在中国的应用现状及研究进展。

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY
Song Li, Zhi-Ling Zhu, Lei Cheng
{"title":"过敏原免疫治疗在中国的应用现状及研究进展。","authors":"Song Li,&nbsp;Zhi-Ling Zhu,&nbsp;Lei Cheng","doi":"10.1111/cea.70116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Allergic diseases, including allergic rhinitis (AR), asthma, food allergies and drug allergies, are significant health issues globally and in China. AR affects 10%–40% of the global population [<span>1</span>], and 18.6%–52.9% across regions in China [<span>2</span>]. The prevalence of asthma has kept rising to 4.2% in China by 2015 [<span>3</span>]. This rampancy is also observed in other allergic diseases, together straining the public health systems around the world.</p><p>Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) alleviates IgE-mediated allergic diseases by inducing immune tolerance through a controlled and progressive exposure to allergens. Despite its eye-catching outcomes in China, AIT still faces hurdles in its wider replication, such as lack of individualisation, poor patient compliance and inadequate understanding among clinicians and patients. This paper provides a view on the current status, progress and future directions of AIT in China.</p><p>Since its discovery in 1911, AIT has already been established as a mainstay for treating allergic diseases in Western countries. In China, AIT was first copied in the 1960s by the allergy department (established in 1956 and the only one then) at Peking Union Medical College Hospital. However, the expansion of AIT was slow until the approval of standardised allergen extracts in the late 1990s and early 2000s. In recent years, the application of AIT has been accelerated due to increasing recognition from medical professionals and demand from patients. The release of Chinese AIT guidelines has bolstered basic, clinical and translational research. PubMed data show that the number of AIT-related studies involving Chinese scholars has doubled since 2018. Hot research keywords include sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT), subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT), efficacy and safety, biomarkers, immunoregulation and omalizumab. Increasing research fruits have been published in top journals (Figure 1).</p><p>More recently, Chinese scholars have set out on the journey to explore new delivery routes in AIT, such as oral immunotherapy, intracervical lymphatic immunotherapy, intratonsillar immunotherapy, as well as the combined application of biologics in AIT. Mechanistical research has even turned the lens to the association of gut microbiota with AIT outcomes. The roles of follicular helper T cells and regulatory T cells in allergic diseases and AIT have also been further elucidated. In summary, Chinese scholars have caught up with the global pace in the research on AIT.</p><p>Supported by the results from mechanistical research and the experience from frontline clinicians, Chinese AIT guidelines have been released. In 2017, the first edition of the Chinese Guideline on Allergen Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinitis [<span>4</span>] was published by the Chinese Society of Allergy (CSA) and the Chinese Allergic Rhinitis Collaborative Research Group (C<sup>2</sup>AR<sup>2</sup>G), providing evidence-based recommendations and filling a gap in AR immunotherapy guidance. This guideline covered essential aspects of AIT, such as indications, allergen selection, dosing and adverse effect management. In 2022, the guideline was refreshed [<span>5</span>], depending on clinical experience gained during the COVID-19 pandemic and unique Chinese practices and strategies, such as cluster and rush immunotherapies. Besides, the updated guideline also addresses AIT in paediatric AR and concurrent medication use, providing comprehensive guidance. The 2022 edition reaffirmed the efficacy of AIT in relieving symptoms, reducing medications, improving quality of life and preventing AR progression into asthma, while emphasising its safety and contraindications. These changes demonstrate the alignment between Chinese and international standards in AR immunotherapy.</p><p>Similarly, the AIT guideline for allergic asthma in China has also seen continual optimisation. In early guidelines (e.g., the 2016 edition), AIT was cautiously suggested, due to limited evidence. Supported by clinical data in China, the 2019 edition endorsed AIT as a personalised therapy, marking a pivotal shift in understanding. By 2024, AIT had been recognised as a disease-modifying treatment, particularly for mild-to-moderate allergic asthma, thanks to its potential to curb disease progression and reduce medication dependence.</p><p>Compared with international guidelines, such as those from EAACI [<span>6</span>] and the AAAAI/ACAAI Joint Task Force [<span>7</span>], the Chinese AIT guidelines exhibit several differences. In Chinese guidelines, AIT is recommended as the first-line treatment for AR patients with obvious allergen-related symptoms, adopting a more open attitude without setting too many preconditions. In contrast, EAACI suggests considering AIT mainly for patients with moderate-to-severe AR symptoms that are inadequately controlled by regular and appropriate pharmacotherapy, and/or allergen avoidance. AAAAI/ACAAI's stance on indications is similar to that of EAACI, both being more conservative and emphasising disease severity and a poor response to pharmacotherapy as prerequisites for AIT. Consistently, all three guidelines consider uncontrolled or severe asthma an absolute contraindication. However, the Chinese guideline lists additional absolute contraindications to SCIT, such as children younger than 5 years of age and older adults older than 65 years of age, current use of β-receptor antagonists, uncontrolled systemic autoimmune disease, active malignant neoplasia, and commencing SCIT during pregnancy. EAACI proposes contraindications related to active systemic autoimmune disorders and active malignant neoplasia, and recommends against initiating AIT during pregnancy. The AAAAI/ACAAI Joint Task Force prefers a risk–benefit assessment for initiating AIT. Additionally, a low patient adherence discounts the efficacy of AIT in China, with many patients discontinuing the treatment abruptly. To address this challenge, the Chinese guideline offers details about how to continue AIT after missed doses, an area that is relatively underexplored in other guidelines (Figure 2).</p><p>The application of AIT in China is still impeded by multiple factors, including poor patient compliance (often due to the psychological burden of long-term therapy), high costs, inconvenient procedures, potential adverse reactions and lack of confidence in outcomes. For instance, the non-compliance rate is about 16.27% in patients receiving SLIT, mainly due to unmet therapeutic expectations [<span>8</span>]. Moreover, current diagnostic tools may not always be accurate enough to identify specific allergens, thus failing the workout of an optimal strategy. There is also a shortage of specialised institutions and practitioners. According to the data from the Chinese College of Allergy and Asthma (CCAA) in 2022, out of 502 hospitals surveyed nationwide, only 90 hospitals had a special allergy department, staffed by just 350 professionals in total, resulting in a 1:4 million ratio in the general Chinese population. Inadequate standardisation of allergen vaccines, often extracted from natural sources with variable quality and efficacy, is another key challenge. The biological activity and immunogenicity of vaccines should be standardised for improving the efficacy and reducing the adverse reactions of AIT. Additionally, the long-term (3–5 years) AIT treatment brings significant financial and labour burdens.</p><p>AIT will surely become a powerful weapon combatting allergic diseases in China. Research focus will be laid on new delivery routes, like epicutaneous, oral, intracervical lymphatic and intratonsillar immunotherapy, which have shown potential to enhance the safety and ease the operation of AIT. Novel adjuvants, nanotechnology and standardised recombinant allergen vaccines can be expected as AIT boosters. The spectrum of AIT-treated diseases should be broadened to cover food allergy, a disease attracting more attention. New allergen vaccines should be invented to cover more common allergens, such as pollens, moulds, animal dander and so on. Emerging bioinformatic and molecular technologies will help create genetically engineered allergens that induce immune tolerance without allergic reactions. Digitalisation and AI technology will revolutionise the management of allergic diseases [<span>9</span>]. Digital healthcare platforms can provide personalised education and collect real-time feedback. AI models can assist in the quest for new biomarkers, thus facilitating the individualisation of AIT. Policies should be made to increase reimbursement and reduce the financial burden on patients receiving AIT, promote the innovation of new vaccines and delivery systems, train AIT specialists and establish more specialised allergy departments or centres in China.</p><p><b>Song Li:</b> conceptualization of the review topic, literature search and data collection, and drafting of the manuscript. <b>Zhi-Ling Zhu:</b> co-conceptualization of the review topic, literature search and data collection, and preparation of figures. <b>Lei Cheng:</b> supervision of the project, critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content, provision of essential resources and support, and final approval of the version to be published. Each author has contributed significantly to the research and preparation of this manuscript and has approved the final version for submission.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":10207,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Allergy","volume":"55 8","pages":"607-610"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cea.70116","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of Allergen Immunotherapy in China: Current Status and Research Progress\",\"authors\":\"Song Li,&nbsp;Zhi-Ling Zhu,&nbsp;Lei Cheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cea.70116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Allergic diseases, including allergic rhinitis (AR), asthma, food allergies and drug allergies, are significant health issues globally and in China. AR affects 10%–40% of the global population [<span>1</span>], and 18.6%–52.9% across regions in China [<span>2</span>]. The prevalence of asthma has kept rising to 4.2% in China by 2015 [<span>3</span>]. This rampancy is also observed in other allergic diseases, together straining the public health systems around the world.</p><p>Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) alleviates IgE-mediated allergic diseases by inducing immune tolerance through a controlled and progressive exposure to allergens. Despite its eye-catching outcomes in China, AIT still faces hurdles in its wider replication, such as lack of individualisation, poor patient compliance and inadequate understanding among clinicians and patients. This paper provides a view on the current status, progress and future directions of AIT in China.</p><p>Since its discovery in 1911, AIT has already been established as a mainstay for treating allergic diseases in Western countries. In China, AIT was first copied in the 1960s by the allergy department (established in 1956 and the only one then) at Peking Union Medical College Hospital. However, the expansion of AIT was slow until the approval of standardised allergen extracts in the late 1990s and early 2000s. In recent years, the application of AIT has been accelerated due to increasing recognition from medical professionals and demand from patients. The release of Chinese AIT guidelines has bolstered basic, clinical and translational research. PubMed data show that the number of AIT-related studies involving Chinese scholars has doubled since 2018. Hot research keywords include sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT), subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT), efficacy and safety, biomarkers, immunoregulation and omalizumab. Increasing research fruits have been published in top journals (Figure 1).</p><p>More recently, Chinese scholars have set out on the journey to explore new delivery routes in AIT, such as oral immunotherapy, intracervical lymphatic immunotherapy, intratonsillar immunotherapy, as well as the combined application of biologics in AIT. Mechanistical research has even turned the lens to the association of gut microbiota with AIT outcomes. The roles of follicular helper T cells and regulatory T cells in allergic diseases and AIT have also been further elucidated. In summary, Chinese scholars have caught up with the global pace in the research on AIT.</p><p>Supported by the results from mechanistical research and the experience from frontline clinicians, Chinese AIT guidelines have been released. In 2017, the first edition of the Chinese Guideline on Allergen Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinitis [<span>4</span>] was published by the Chinese Society of Allergy (CSA) and the Chinese Allergic Rhinitis Collaborative Research Group (C<sup>2</sup>AR<sup>2</sup>G), providing evidence-based recommendations and filling a gap in AR immunotherapy guidance. This guideline covered essential aspects of AIT, such as indications, allergen selection, dosing and adverse effect management. In 2022, the guideline was refreshed [<span>5</span>], depending on clinical experience gained during the COVID-19 pandemic and unique Chinese practices and strategies, such as cluster and rush immunotherapies. Besides, the updated guideline also addresses AIT in paediatric AR and concurrent medication use, providing comprehensive guidance. The 2022 edition reaffirmed the efficacy of AIT in relieving symptoms, reducing medications, improving quality of life and preventing AR progression into asthma, while emphasising its safety and contraindications. These changes demonstrate the alignment between Chinese and international standards in AR immunotherapy.</p><p>Similarly, the AIT guideline for allergic asthma in China has also seen continual optimisation. In early guidelines (e.g., the 2016 edition), AIT was cautiously suggested, due to limited evidence. Supported by clinical data in China, the 2019 edition endorsed AIT as a personalised therapy, marking a pivotal shift in understanding. By 2024, AIT had been recognised as a disease-modifying treatment, particularly for mild-to-moderate allergic asthma, thanks to its potential to curb disease progression and reduce medication dependence.</p><p>Compared with international guidelines, such as those from EAACI [<span>6</span>] and the AAAAI/ACAAI Joint Task Force [<span>7</span>], the Chinese AIT guidelines exhibit several differences. In Chinese guidelines, AIT is recommended as the first-line treatment for AR patients with obvious allergen-related symptoms, adopting a more open attitude without setting too many preconditions. In contrast, EAACI suggests considering AIT mainly for patients with moderate-to-severe AR symptoms that are inadequately controlled by regular and appropriate pharmacotherapy, and/or allergen avoidance. AAAAI/ACAAI's stance on indications is similar to that of EAACI, both being more conservative and emphasising disease severity and a poor response to pharmacotherapy as prerequisites for AIT. Consistently, all three guidelines consider uncontrolled or severe asthma an absolute contraindication. However, the Chinese guideline lists additional absolute contraindications to SCIT, such as children younger than 5 years of age and older adults older than 65 years of age, current use of β-receptor antagonists, uncontrolled systemic autoimmune disease, active malignant neoplasia, and commencing SCIT during pregnancy. EAACI proposes contraindications related to active systemic autoimmune disorders and active malignant neoplasia, and recommends against initiating AIT during pregnancy. The AAAAI/ACAAI Joint Task Force prefers a risk–benefit assessment for initiating AIT. Additionally, a low patient adherence discounts the efficacy of AIT in China, with many patients discontinuing the treatment abruptly. To address this challenge, the Chinese guideline offers details about how to continue AIT after missed doses, an area that is relatively underexplored in other guidelines (Figure 2).</p><p>The application of AIT in China is still impeded by multiple factors, including poor patient compliance (often due to the psychological burden of long-term therapy), high costs, inconvenient procedures, potential adverse reactions and lack of confidence in outcomes. For instance, the non-compliance rate is about 16.27% in patients receiving SLIT, mainly due to unmet therapeutic expectations [<span>8</span>]. Moreover, current diagnostic tools may not always be accurate enough to identify specific allergens, thus failing the workout of an optimal strategy. There is also a shortage of specialised institutions and practitioners. According to the data from the Chinese College of Allergy and Asthma (CCAA) in 2022, out of 502 hospitals surveyed nationwide, only 90 hospitals had a special allergy department, staffed by just 350 professionals in total, resulting in a 1:4 million ratio in the general Chinese population. Inadequate standardisation of allergen vaccines, often extracted from natural sources with variable quality and efficacy, is another key challenge. The biological activity and immunogenicity of vaccines should be standardised for improving the efficacy and reducing the adverse reactions of AIT. Additionally, the long-term (3–5 years) AIT treatment brings significant financial and labour burdens.</p><p>AIT will surely become a powerful weapon combatting allergic diseases in China. Research focus will be laid on new delivery routes, like epicutaneous, oral, intracervical lymphatic and intratonsillar immunotherapy, which have shown potential to enhance the safety and ease the operation of AIT. Novel adjuvants, nanotechnology and standardised recombinant allergen vaccines can be expected as AIT boosters. The spectrum of AIT-treated diseases should be broadened to cover food allergy, a disease attracting more attention. New allergen vaccines should be invented to cover more common allergens, such as pollens, moulds, animal dander and so on. Emerging bioinformatic and molecular technologies will help create genetically engineered allergens that induce immune tolerance without allergic reactions. Digitalisation and AI technology will revolutionise the management of allergic diseases [<span>9</span>]. Digital healthcare platforms can provide personalised education and collect real-time feedback. AI models can assist in the quest for new biomarkers, thus facilitating the individualisation of AIT. Policies should be made to increase reimbursement and reduce the financial burden on patients receiving AIT, promote the innovation of new vaccines and delivery systems, train AIT specialists and establish more specialised allergy departments or centres in China.</p><p><b>Song Li:</b> conceptualization of the review topic, literature search and data collection, and drafting of the manuscript. <b>Zhi-Ling Zhu:</b> co-conceptualization of the review topic, literature search and data collection, and preparation of figures. <b>Lei Cheng:</b> supervision of the project, critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content, provision of essential resources and support, and final approval of the version to be published. Each author has contributed significantly to the research and preparation of this manuscript and has approved the final version for submission.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Allergy\",\"volume\":\"55 8\",\"pages\":\"607-610\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cea.70116\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Allergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cea.70116\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cea.70116","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

过敏性疾病,包括过敏性鼻炎(AR)、哮喘、食物过敏和药物过敏,是全球和中国的重大健康问题。AR影响全球10%-40%的人口[1],在中国各地区影响18.6%-52.9%[1]。到2015年,中国哮喘患病率持续上升至4.2%。在其他过敏性疾病中也观察到这种猖獗,它们共同给世界各地的公共卫生系统带来了压力。过敏原免疫疗法(AIT)通过控制和渐进暴露于过敏原,诱导免疫耐受,减轻ige介导的过敏性疾病。尽管在中国取得了引人注目的成果,但在更广泛地推广AIT方面仍面临障碍,例如缺乏个性化、患者依从性差以及临床医生和患者之间的理解不足。本文对中国AIT的现状、进展和未来发展方向进行了展望。自1911年发现以来,AIT已成为西方国家治疗过敏性疾病的主要手段。在中国,AIT最早在20世纪60年代由北京协和医院变态反应科(1956年成立,当时唯一的变态反应科)复制。然而,在20世纪90年代末和21世纪初批准标准化过敏原提取物之前,AIT的扩张速度很慢。近年来,由于医疗专业人士的认可和病人的需求日益增加,在台资讯科技的应用已加速。中国AIT指南的发布促进了基础、临床和转化研究。PubMed数据显示,自2018年以来,涉及中国学者的ait相关研究数量翻了一番。热点研究关键词包括舌下免疫治疗(SLIT)、皮下免疫治疗(SCIT)、疗效和安全性、生物标志物、免疫调节和奥玛珠单抗。越来越多的研究成果在顶级期刊上发表(图1)。近年来,中国学者开始探索新的给药途径,如口服免疫治疗、颈内淋巴免疫治疗、胞内免疫治疗,以及生物制剂在AIT中的联合应用。机械研究甚至将目光转向了肠道微生物群与AIT结果的关系。滤泡辅助性T细胞和调节性T细胞在过敏性疾病和AIT中的作用也得到了进一步的阐明。综上所述,中国学者对在台投资的研究已经赶上了全球的步伐。在机械研究结果和一线临床医生经验的支持下,中国AIT指南已经发布。2017年,中国变态反应学会(CSA)和中国变态反应性鼻炎合作研究小组(C2AR2G)发布了第一版《中国变态反应性鼻炎过敏原免疫治疗指南[4]》,提供了循证建议,填补了AR免疫治疗指导的空白。该指南涵盖了AIT的基本方面,如适应症、过敏原选择、剂量和不良反应管理。2022年,根据在新冠肺炎大流行期间获得的临床经验,以及中国独特的做法和策略,如聚集性和紧急免疫治疗,该指南被更新为100年。此外,更新后的指南还涉及儿科急性呼吸道感染和并发用药的AIT,提供了全面的指导。2022年版重申了AIT在缓解症状、减少用药、改善生活质量和防止AR进展为哮喘方面的功效,同时强调了其安全性和禁忌症。这些变化表明了中国和国际AR免疫治疗标准的一致性。同样,中国的AIT过敏性哮喘指南也在不断优化。在早期的指南(如2016年版)中,由于证据有限,AIT被谨慎地建议。在中国临床数据的支持下,2019年版认可AIT是一种个性化治疗,标志着人们对AIT的理解发生了关键转变。到2024年,AIT已被公认为一种改善疾病的治疗方法,特别是对于轻度至中度过敏性哮喘,这要归功于其抑制疾病进展和减少药物依赖的潜力。与国际指南(如EAACI b[6]和AAAAI/ACAAI联合工作组b[7])相比,中国AIT指南有几个不同之处。在中国的指南中,对于有明显过敏原相关症状的AR患者,推荐AIT作为一线治疗,采取更加开放的态度,不需要设定太多的前提条件。相比之下,EAACI建议主要考虑对有中重度AR症状的患者进行AIT,这些患者不能通过常规和适当的药物治疗得到充分控制,和/或避免过敏原。 AAAAI/ACAAI在适应症上的立场与EAACI相似,都更加保守,强调疾病严重程度和对药物治疗的不良反应是AIT的先决条件。三份指南一致认为,未控制或严重哮喘是绝对禁忌症。然而,中国指南列出了额外的SCIT绝对禁忌症,如5岁以下儿童和65岁以上老年人,目前使用β受体拮抗剂,不受控制的系统性自身免疫性疾病,活动性恶性肿瘤,以及怀孕期间开始SCIT。EAACI提出了与活动性全身自身免疫性疾病和活动性恶性肿瘤相关的禁忌症,并建议不要在怀孕期间启动AIT。AAAAI/ACAAI联合工作组倾向于在启动AIT时进行风险-收益评估。此外,在中国,患者依从性低降低了AIT的疗效,许多患者突然停止治疗。为了应对这一挑战,中国指南提供了在错过剂量后如何继续AIT的详细信息,这是其他指南中相对较少探索的领域(图2)。在中国,AIT的应用仍然受到多种因素的阻碍,包括患者依从性差(通常是由于长期治疗的心理负担)、费用高、操作不便、潜在的不良反应以及对结果缺乏信心。例如,在接受SLIT治疗的患者中,不遵守率约为16.27%,主要原因是治疗预期未达到[8]。此外,目前的诊断工具可能并不总是准确到足以识别特定的过敏原,因此无法锻炼出最佳策略。此外,还缺乏专门的机构和从业人员。根据中国过敏与哮喘学院(CCAA) 2022年的数据,在全国502家接受调查的医院中,只有90家医院设有专门的过敏科,总共只有350名专业人员,导致中国总人口的比例为1:40万。过敏原疫苗通常是从质量和效力参差不齐的天然来源提取的,缺乏标准化是另一个关键挑战。应规范疫苗的生物活性和免疫原性,以提高AIT的疗效,减少不良反应。此外,长期(3-5年)的AIT治疗带来了巨大的经济和劳动力负担。AIT必将成为中国抗击过敏性疾病的有力武器。研究重点将放在新的给药途径,如表皮、口服、颈内淋巴和胞内免疫治疗,这些方法已显示出提高AIT安全性和简化操作的潜力。新型佐剂、纳米技术和标准化的重组过敏原疫苗有望成为AIT的助推器。ait治疗疾病的范围应该扩大到食物过敏,这是一个引起更多关注的疾病。应发明新的过敏原疫苗,以覆盖更常见的过敏原,如花粉、霉菌、动物皮屑等。新兴的生物信息学和分子技术将有助于创造基因工程过敏原,诱导免疫耐受而不产生过敏反应。数字化和人工智能技术将彻底改变过敏性疾病的管理。数字医疗平台可以提供个性化教育并收集实时反馈。人工智能模型可以帮助寻找新的生物标志物,从而促进人工智能的个性化。应制定政策,增加对接受AIT治疗的患者的报销并减轻其经济负担,促进新疫苗和给药系统的创新,培训AIT专家,并在中国建立更多专门的过敏科或中心。宋丽:综述主题构思,文献检索和资料收集,撰写稿件。朱志玲:共同构思综述主题、文献检索和数据收集、数据准备。雷成:项目监督,对重要知识内容的稿件进行关键性修改,提供必要的资源和支持,最终审定出版版本。每位作者都对这份手稿的研究和准备做出了重大贡献,并批准了提交的最终版本。作者声明无利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Use of Allergen Immunotherapy in China: Current Status and Research Progress

Use of Allergen Immunotherapy in China: Current Status and Research Progress

Allergic diseases, including allergic rhinitis (AR), asthma, food allergies and drug allergies, are significant health issues globally and in China. AR affects 10%–40% of the global population [1], and 18.6%–52.9% across regions in China [2]. The prevalence of asthma has kept rising to 4.2% in China by 2015 [3]. This rampancy is also observed in other allergic diseases, together straining the public health systems around the world.

Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) alleviates IgE-mediated allergic diseases by inducing immune tolerance through a controlled and progressive exposure to allergens. Despite its eye-catching outcomes in China, AIT still faces hurdles in its wider replication, such as lack of individualisation, poor patient compliance and inadequate understanding among clinicians and patients. This paper provides a view on the current status, progress and future directions of AIT in China.

Since its discovery in 1911, AIT has already been established as a mainstay for treating allergic diseases in Western countries. In China, AIT was first copied in the 1960s by the allergy department (established in 1956 and the only one then) at Peking Union Medical College Hospital. However, the expansion of AIT was slow until the approval of standardised allergen extracts in the late 1990s and early 2000s. In recent years, the application of AIT has been accelerated due to increasing recognition from medical professionals and demand from patients. The release of Chinese AIT guidelines has bolstered basic, clinical and translational research. PubMed data show that the number of AIT-related studies involving Chinese scholars has doubled since 2018. Hot research keywords include sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT), subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT), efficacy and safety, biomarkers, immunoregulation and omalizumab. Increasing research fruits have been published in top journals (Figure 1).

More recently, Chinese scholars have set out on the journey to explore new delivery routes in AIT, such as oral immunotherapy, intracervical lymphatic immunotherapy, intratonsillar immunotherapy, as well as the combined application of biologics in AIT. Mechanistical research has even turned the lens to the association of gut microbiota with AIT outcomes. The roles of follicular helper T cells and regulatory T cells in allergic diseases and AIT have also been further elucidated. In summary, Chinese scholars have caught up with the global pace in the research on AIT.

Supported by the results from mechanistical research and the experience from frontline clinicians, Chinese AIT guidelines have been released. In 2017, the first edition of the Chinese Guideline on Allergen Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinitis [4] was published by the Chinese Society of Allergy (CSA) and the Chinese Allergic Rhinitis Collaborative Research Group (C2AR2G), providing evidence-based recommendations and filling a gap in AR immunotherapy guidance. This guideline covered essential aspects of AIT, such as indications, allergen selection, dosing and adverse effect management. In 2022, the guideline was refreshed [5], depending on clinical experience gained during the COVID-19 pandemic and unique Chinese practices and strategies, such as cluster and rush immunotherapies. Besides, the updated guideline also addresses AIT in paediatric AR and concurrent medication use, providing comprehensive guidance. The 2022 edition reaffirmed the efficacy of AIT in relieving symptoms, reducing medications, improving quality of life and preventing AR progression into asthma, while emphasising its safety and contraindications. These changes demonstrate the alignment between Chinese and international standards in AR immunotherapy.

Similarly, the AIT guideline for allergic asthma in China has also seen continual optimisation. In early guidelines (e.g., the 2016 edition), AIT was cautiously suggested, due to limited evidence. Supported by clinical data in China, the 2019 edition endorsed AIT as a personalised therapy, marking a pivotal shift in understanding. By 2024, AIT had been recognised as a disease-modifying treatment, particularly for mild-to-moderate allergic asthma, thanks to its potential to curb disease progression and reduce medication dependence.

Compared with international guidelines, such as those from EAACI [6] and the AAAAI/ACAAI Joint Task Force [7], the Chinese AIT guidelines exhibit several differences. In Chinese guidelines, AIT is recommended as the first-line treatment for AR patients with obvious allergen-related symptoms, adopting a more open attitude without setting too many preconditions. In contrast, EAACI suggests considering AIT mainly for patients with moderate-to-severe AR symptoms that are inadequately controlled by regular and appropriate pharmacotherapy, and/or allergen avoidance. AAAAI/ACAAI's stance on indications is similar to that of EAACI, both being more conservative and emphasising disease severity and a poor response to pharmacotherapy as prerequisites for AIT. Consistently, all three guidelines consider uncontrolled or severe asthma an absolute contraindication. However, the Chinese guideline lists additional absolute contraindications to SCIT, such as children younger than 5 years of age and older adults older than 65 years of age, current use of β-receptor antagonists, uncontrolled systemic autoimmune disease, active malignant neoplasia, and commencing SCIT during pregnancy. EAACI proposes contraindications related to active systemic autoimmune disorders and active malignant neoplasia, and recommends against initiating AIT during pregnancy. The AAAAI/ACAAI Joint Task Force prefers a risk–benefit assessment for initiating AIT. Additionally, a low patient adherence discounts the efficacy of AIT in China, with many patients discontinuing the treatment abruptly. To address this challenge, the Chinese guideline offers details about how to continue AIT after missed doses, an area that is relatively underexplored in other guidelines (Figure 2).

The application of AIT in China is still impeded by multiple factors, including poor patient compliance (often due to the psychological burden of long-term therapy), high costs, inconvenient procedures, potential adverse reactions and lack of confidence in outcomes. For instance, the non-compliance rate is about 16.27% in patients receiving SLIT, mainly due to unmet therapeutic expectations [8]. Moreover, current diagnostic tools may not always be accurate enough to identify specific allergens, thus failing the workout of an optimal strategy. There is also a shortage of specialised institutions and practitioners. According to the data from the Chinese College of Allergy and Asthma (CCAA) in 2022, out of 502 hospitals surveyed nationwide, only 90 hospitals had a special allergy department, staffed by just 350 professionals in total, resulting in a 1:4 million ratio in the general Chinese population. Inadequate standardisation of allergen vaccines, often extracted from natural sources with variable quality and efficacy, is another key challenge. The biological activity and immunogenicity of vaccines should be standardised for improving the efficacy and reducing the adverse reactions of AIT. Additionally, the long-term (3–5 years) AIT treatment brings significant financial and labour burdens.

AIT will surely become a powerful weapon combatting allergic diseases in China. Research focus will be laid on new delivery routes, like epicutaneous, oral, intracervical lymphatic and intratonsillar immunotherapy, which have shown potential to enhance the safety and ease the operation of AIT. Novel adjuvants, nanotechnology and standardised recombinant allergen vaccines can be expected as AIT boosters. The spectrum of AIT-treated diseases should be broadened to cover food allergy, a disease attracting more attention. New allergen vaccines should be invented to cover more common allergens, such as pollens, moulds, animal dander and so on. Emerging bioinformatic and molecular technologies will help create genetically engineered allergens that induce immune tolerance without allergic reactions. Digitalisation and AI technology will revolutionise the management of allergic diseases [9]. Digital healthcare platforms can provide personalised education and collect real-time feedback. AI models can assist in the quest for new biomarkers, thus facilitating the individualisation of AIT. Policies should be made to increase reimbursement and reduce the financial burden on patients receiving AIT, promote the innovation of new vaccines and delivery systems, train AIT specialists and establish more specialised allergy departments or centres in China.

Song Li: conceptualization of the review topic, literature search and data collection, and drafting of the manuscript. Zhi-Ling Zhu: co-conceptualization of the review topic, literature search and data collection, and preparation of figures. Lei Cheng: supervision of the project, critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content, provision of essential resources and support, and final approval of the version to be published. Each author has contributed significantly to the research and preparation of this manuscript and has approved the final version for submission.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
9.80%
发文量
189
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical & Experimental Allergy strikes an excellent balance between clinical and scientific articles and carries regular reviews and editorials written by leading authorities in their field. In response to the increasing number of quality submissions, since 1996 the journals size has increased by over 30%. Clinical & Experimental Allergy is essential reading for allergy practitioners and research scientists with an interest in allergic diseases and mechanisms. Truly international in appeal, Clinical & Experimental Allergy publishes clinical and experimental observations in disease in all fields of medicine in which allergic hypersensitivity plays a part.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信