识别大学饮酒的显著社会、环境和情境背景:对饮酒结果的影响。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Abby L Braitman, Jennifer L Shipley, Megan Strowger, Emily S Renzoni
{"title":"识别大学饮酒的显著社会、环境和情境背景:对饮酒结果的影响。","authors":"Abby L Braitman, Jennifer L Shipley, Megan Strowger, Emily S Renzoni","doi":"10.1111/ajad.70065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Drinking context, such as where, why, and under what social conditions drinking occurs, is consistently associated with daily variability in alcohol use. However, ecological momentary assessment (EMA) requires very brief measurement, not allowing for as many contextual assessments as researchers may like. The current investigation examined common contextual predictors and their associations with different alcohol outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A sample of N = 528 college drinkers completed three surveys about their most recent drinking episode. This included contextual predictors (location, social context, who was present, alcohol offers, and drinking motives), as well as typical drinking outcomes (number of drinks, estimated blood alcohol concentration, perceived level of drunkenness) and high-risk drinking outcomes (binge drinking, blacking out, passing out). The current study used a traditional longitudinal design, allowing for inclusion of longer assessments of drinking than EMA can accommodate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The strongest predictors were consistent across outcome types, including with whom participants were drinking, number of people present, and alcohol offers. Despite consistent significant prediction of outcomes, drinking location accounted for little variance in alcohol outcomes. Social and enhancement motives had stronger links to outcomes in this sample of general college drinkers than conformity or coping drinking motives.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>Although numerous options are available for assessing drinking context, some predictors are more impactful than others.</p><p><strong>Scientific significance: </strong>Findings may help researchers using traditional daily diary or EMA designs focus on the context-specific predictors with the most impact on their outcomes of interest in their limited number of assessment items.</p>","PeriodicalId":7762,"journal":{"name":"American Journal on Addictions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying salient social, environmental, and situational contexts of college drinking: Impacts across drinking outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Abby L Braitman, Jennifer L Shipley, Megan Strowger, Emily S Renzoni\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajad.70065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Drinking context, such as where, why, and under what social conditions drinking occurs, is consistently associated with daily variability in alcohol use. However, ecological momentary assessment (EMA) requires very brief measurement, not allowing for as many contextual assessments as researchers may like. The current investigation examined common contextual predictors and their associations with different alcohol outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A sample of N = 528 college drinkers completed three surveys about their most recent drinking episode. This included contextual predictors (location, social context, who was present, alcohol offers, and drinking motives), as well as typical drinking outcomes (number of drinks, estimated blood alcohol concentration, perceived level of drunkenness) and high-risk drinking outcomes (binge drinking, blacking out, passing out). The current study used a traditional longitudinal design, allowing for inclusion of longer assessments of drinking than EMA can accommodate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The strongest predictors were consistent across outcome types, including with whom participants were drinking, number of people present, and alcohol offers. Despite consistent significant prediction of outcomes, drinking location accounted for little variance in alcohol outcomes. Social and enhancement motives had stronger links to outcomes in this sample of general college drinkers than conformity or coping drinking motives.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>Although numerous options are available for assessing drinking context, some predictors are more impactful than others.</p><p><strong>Scientific significance: </strong>Findings may help researchers using traditional daily diary or EMA designs focus on the context-specific predictors with the most impact on their outcomes of interest in their limited number of assessment items.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal on Addictions\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal on Addictions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajad.70065\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal on Addictions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajad.70065","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:饮酒环境,如饮酒的地点、原因和在何种社会条件下发生,始终与酒精使用的日常变化有关。然而,生态瞬时评估(EMA)需要非常简短的测量,不允许研究人员可能喜欢的那么多上下文评估。目前的研究检查了常见的背景预测因素及其与不同酒精结果的关系。方法:528名大学生饮酒者完成了关于他们最近饮酒事件的三项调查。这包括上下文预测因素(地点、社会背景、在场的人、提供的酒精和饮酒动机),以及典型的饮酒结果(饮酒数量、估计的血液酒精浓度、感知的醉酒程度)和高风险饮酒结果(酗酒、昏迷、昏倒)。目前的研究使用了传统的纵向设计,允许纳入比EMA所能容纳的更长时间的饮酒评估。结果:最强的预测因子在结果类型中是一致的,包括参与者喝酒的人、在场的人数和提供的酒精。尽管对结果有一致的显著预测,但饮酒地点对酒精结果的影响很小。在这个普通大学饮酒者的样本中,社会动机和提升动机与结果的联系比从众或应对饮酒动机更强。讨论和结论:尽管有许多选择可用于评估饮酒环境,但一些预测因素比其他预测因素更有影响力。科学意义:研究结果可以帮助使用传统日记本或EMA设计的研究人员在有限数量的评估项目中关注对他们感兴趣的结果影响最大的特定环境预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identifying salient social, environmental, and situational contexts of college drinking: Impacts across drinking outcomes.

Background and objectives: Drinking context, such as where, why, and under what social conditions drinking occurs, is consistently associated with daily variability in alcohol use. However, ecological momentary assessment (EMA) requires very brief measurement, not allowing for as many contextual assessments as researchers may like. The current investigation examined common contextual predictors and their associations with different alcohol outcomes.

Methods: A sample of N = 528 college drinkers completed three surveys about their most recent drinking episode. This included contextual predictors (location, social context, who was present, alcohol offers, and drinking motives), as well as typical drinking outcomes (number of drinks, estimated blood alcohol concentration, perceived level of drunkenness) and high-risk drinking outcomes (binge drinking, blacking out, passing out). The current study used a traditional longitudinal design, allowing for inclusion of longer assessments of drinking than EMA can accommodate.

Results: The strongest predictors were consistent across outcome types, including with whom participants were drinking, number of people present, and alcohol offers. Despite consistent significant prediction of outcomes, drinking location accounted for little variance in alcohol outcomes. Social and enhancement motives had stronger links to outcomes in this sample of general college drinkers than conformity or coping drinking motives.

Discussion and conclusions: Although numerous options are available for assessing drinking context, some predictors are more impactful than others.

Scientific significance: Findings may help researchers using traditional daily diary or EMA designs focus on the context-specific predictors with the most impact on their outcomes of interest in their limited number of assessment items.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: The American Journal on Addictions is the official journal of the American Academy of Addiction Psychiatry. The Academy encourages research on the etiology, prevention, identification, and treatment of substance abuse; thus, the journal provides a forum for the dissemination of information in the extensive field of addiction. Each issue of this publication covers a wide variety of topics ranging from codependence to genetics, epidemiology to dual diagnostics, etiology to neuroscience, and much more. Features of the journal, all written by experts in the field, include special overview articles, clinical or basic research papers, clinical updates, and book reviews within the area of addictions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信