急性压力下仪器任务的飞行员表现。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 BIOPHYSICS
Hao Jiang, Haokai Jiang, Qianlei Wang, Xing Peng, Quanchuan Wang, Qi Zhu, Jiazhong Yang
{"title":"急性压力下仪器任务的飞行员表现。","authors":"Hao Jiang, Haokai Jiang, Qianlei Wang, Xing Peng, Quanchuan Wang, Qi Zhu, Jiazhong Yang","doi":"10.3357/AMHP.6630.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pilots often experience acute stress during flights, potentially affecting flight safety. The effect of acute stress on instrument-based tasks remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the influence of acute stress on subjects' performance in two crucial tasks: the attitude recovery task and the landing judgment task.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 91 student pilots were divided into a control group and a stress group. Both groups completed a square task, with the stress group exposed to high-intensity noise to induce acute stress. Subsequently, 42 subjects performed an attitude recovery task using two formats of the attitude indicator: moving horizon and moving aircraft. The remaining 49 subjects performed a landing judgment task with three complexity levels using a landing instrument. Heart rates, trait-state anxiety scores, response times, and accuracy of the tasks were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Heart rates and state anxiety scores increased following stress induction. In the attitude task, the stress group responded faster than the control group in the moving-horizon format (467.55 ms vs. 491.45 ms) but had lower accuracy (98.65% vs. 99.73%). In the moving-aircraft format, response times (stress: 454.15 ms, control: 474.73 ms) and accuracy (stress: 98.55%, control: 99.38%) showed no significant differences between the two groups. In the low-complexity landing task, the stress group (1015.79 ms) responded faster than the control group (1168.17 ms).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The impact of acute stress on performance depends on task complexity and stress intensity. While stress impairs performance in complex tasks by increasing errors, it enhances performance in simpler tasks by accelerating responses without compromising accuracy. Jiang H, Jiang H, Wang Q, Peng X, Wang Q, Zhu Q, Yang J. Pilot performance in instrument-based tasks under acute stress. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2025; 96(6):469-477.</p>","PeriodicalId":7463,"journal":{"name":"Aerospace medicine and human performance","volume":"96 6","pages":"469-477"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pilot Performance in Instrument-Based Tasks Under Acute Stress.\",\"authors\":\"Hao Jiang, Haokai Jiang, Qianlei Wang, Xing Peng, Quanchuan Wang, Qi Zhu, Jiazhong Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.3357/AMHP.6630.2025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pilots often experience acute stress during flights, potentially affecting flight safety. The effect of acute stress on instrument-based tasks remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the influence of acute stress on subjects' performance in two crucial tasks: the attitude recovery task and the landing judgment task.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 91 student pilots were divided into a control group and a stress group. Both groups completed a square task, with the stress group exposed to high-intensity noise to induce acute stress. Subsequently, 42 subjects performed an attitude recovery task using two formats of the attitude indicator: moving horizon and moving aircraft. The remaining 49 subjects performed a landing judgment task with three complexity levels using a landing instrument. Heart rates, trait-state anxiety scores, response times, and accuracy of the tasks were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Heart rates and state anxiety scores increased following stress induction. In the attitude task, the stress group responded faster than the control group in the moving-horizon format (467.55 ms vs. 491.45 ms) but had lower accuracy (98.65% vs. 99.73%). In the moving-aircraft format, response times (stress: 454.15 ms, control: 474.73 ms) and accuracy (stress: 98.55%, control: 99.38%) showed no significant differences between the two groups. In the low-complexity landing task, the stress group (1015.79 ms) responded faster than the control group (1168.17 ms).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The impact of acute stress on performance depends on task complexity and stress intensity. While stress impairs performance in complex tasks by increasing errors, it enhances performance in simpler tasks by accelerating responses without compromising accuracy. Jiang H, Jiang H, Wang Q, Peng X, Wang Q, Zhu Q, Yang J. Pilot performance in instrument-based tasks under acute stress. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2025; 96(6):469-477.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aerospace medicine and human performance\",\"volume\":\"96 6\",\"pages\":\"469-477\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aerospace medicine and human performance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.6630.2025\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aerospace medicine and human performance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.6630.2025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:飞行员在飞行过程中经常会经历严重的压力,这可能会影响飞行安全。急性应激对工具性任务的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨急性应激对被试在态度恢复任务和着陆判断任务两个关键任务中的表现的影响。方法:将91名学员分为对照组和应激组。两组都完成了一个方形任务,应激组暴露在高强度噪音中以引起急性应激。随后,42名被试使用移动地平线和移动飞机两种姿态指示器格式进行姿态恢复任务。其余49名受试者使用着陆仪器完成了三个复杂程度的着陆判断任务。分析了心率、特质状态焦虑评分、反应时间和任务的准确性。结果:应激诱导后心率和状态焦虑评分升高。在态度任务中,应激组的反应速度比对照组快(467.55 ms比491.45 ms),但正确率低于对照组(98.65%比99.73%)。在移动-飞行器格式中,应激组的反应时间(454.15 ms,对照组:474.73 ms)和正确率(应激组:98.55%,对照组:99.38%)在两组间无显著差异。在低复杂度着陆任务中,应激组(1015.79 ms)的反应速度快于对照组(1168.17 ms)。讨论:急性压力对绩效的影响取决于任务的复杂性和压力强度。虽然压力会增加错误,从而削弱复杂任务的表现,但它会在不影响准确性的情况下加速反应,从而提高简单任务的表现。蒋宏,姜宏,王强,彭鑫,王强,朱强,杨健。急性应激下仪器任务飞行员的表现。航空航天Med Hum Perform. 2025;96(6): 469 - 477。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pilot Performance in Instrument-Based Tasks Under Acute Stress.

Introduction: Pilots often experience acute stress during flights, potentially affecting flight safety. The effect of acute stress on instrument-based tasks remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the influence of acute stress on subjects' performance in two crucial tasks: the attitude recovery task and the landing judgment task.

Methods: A total of 91 student pilots were divided into a control group and a stress group. Both groups completed a square task, with the stress group exposed to high-intensity noise to induce acute stress. Subsequently, 42 subjects performed an attitude recovery task using two formats of the attitude indicator: moving horizon and moving aircraft. The remaining 49 subjects performed a landing judgment task with three complexity levels using a landing instrument. Heart rates, trait-state anxiety scores, response times, and accuracy of the tasks were analyzed.

Results: Heart rates and state anxiety scores increased following stress induction. In the attitude task, the stress group responded faster than the control group in the moving-horizon format (467.55 ms vs. 491.45 ms) but had lower accuracy (98.65% vs. 99.73%). In the moving-aircraft format, response times (stress: 454.15 ms, control: 474.73 ms) and accuracy (stress: 98.55%, control: 99.38%) showed no significant differences between the two groups. In the low-complexity landing task, the stress group (1015.79 ms) responded faster than the control group (1168.17 ms).

Discussion: The impact of acute stress on performance depends on task complexity and stress intensity. While stress impairs performance in complex tasks by increasing errors, it enhances performance in simpler tasks by accelerating responses without compromising accuracy. Jiang H, Jiang H, Wang Q, Peng X, Wang Q, Zhu Q, Yang J. Pilot performance in instrument-based tasks under acute stress. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2025; 96(6):469-477.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Aerospace medicine and human performance
Aerospace medicine and human performance PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
22.20%
发文量
272
期刊介绍: The peer-reviewed monthly journal, Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance (AMHP), formerly Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, provides contact with physicians, life scientists, bioengineers, and medical specialists working in both basic medical research and in its clinical applications. It is the most used and cited journal in its field. It is distributed to more than 80 nations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信