超越悖论:臭氧治疗作为缺血再灌注损伤的一种化学调节剂-最新进展。

IF 1.8 4区 生物学 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Yong Ye, Zi-Hang Yu, Liang Nie, Fei-Xiang Wang, Guo Mu
{"title":"超越悖论:臭氧治疗作为缺血再灌注损伤的一种化学调节剂-最新进展。","authors":"Yong Ye, Zi-Hang Yu, Liang Nie, Fei-Xiang Wang, Guo Mu","doi":"10.1007/s12013-025-01824-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) represents a significant clinical challenge characterized by mitochondrial dysfunction and redox imbalance during blood flow restoration following ischemia. This review provides a critical analysis of ozone therapy's emerging role in IRI management through its unique hormetic properties. Recent research has transformed our understanding of ozone-traditionally considered harmful-revealing that controlled administration demonstrates remarkable therapeutic potential through dose-dependent effects. Quantitative analysis reveals that low-dose ozone exposure (10-40 µg/mL) significantly reduces oxidative stress markers while increasing antioxidant enzyme activity across multiple organ systems. The protective effects manifest primarily through enhanced Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 activity, orchestrating upregulation of key protective enzymes while suppressing excessive nuclear factor kappa B mediated inflammation. Current evidence demonstrates consistent protective effects across cardiovascular, digestive, urogenital, and cerebral systems, with effect sizes ranging from moderate to large. However, critical analysis reveals significant limitations including predominant reliance on animal models (>95% of studies), lack of standardized protocols, and limited human clinical data. Safety assessment indicates a narrow therapeutic window, with beneficial effects observed at 10-40 µg/mL but potential toxicity at doses >80 µg/mL. This review establishes that while ozone therapy shows promising experimental efficacy in IRI through hormetic modulation of cellular stress responses, substantial research gaps exist regarding optimal dosing, administration protocols, and long-term safety. Future clinical translation requires rigorous standardization of therapeutic parameters, comprehensive safety assessment, and well-designed human trials to validate experimental findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":510,"journal":{"name":"Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond Paradox: Ozone Therapy as a Hormetic Modulator in Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury - An Update.\",\"authors\":\"Yong Ye, Zi-Hang Yu, Liang Nie, Fei-Xiang Wang, Guo Mu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12013-025-01824-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) represents a significant clinical challenge characterized by mitochondrial dysfunction and redox imbalance during blood flow restoration following ischemia. This review provides a critical analysis of ozone therapy's emerging role in IRI management through its unique hormetic properties. Recent research has transformed our understanding of ozone-traditionally considered harmful-revealing that controlled administration demonstrates remarkable therapeutic potential through dose-dependent effects. Quantitative analysis reveals that low-dose ozone exposure (10-40 µg/mL) significantly reduces oxidative stress markers while increasing antioxidant enzyme activity across multiple organ systems. The protective effects manifest primarily through enhanced Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 activity, orchestrating upregulation of key protective enzymes while suppressing excessive nuclear factor kappa B mediated inflammation. Current evidence demonstrates consistent protective effects across cardiovascular, digestive, urogenital, and cerebral systems, with effect sizes ranging from moderate to large. However, critical analysis reveals significant limitations including predominant reliance on animal models (>95% of studies), lack of standardized protocols, and limited human clinical data. Safety assessment indicates a narrow therapeutic window, with beneficial effects observed at 10-40 µg/mL but potential toxicity at doses >80 µg/mL. This review establishes that while ozone therapy shows promising experimental efficacy in IRI through hormetic modulation of cellular stress responses, substantial research gaps exist regarding optimal dosing, administration protocols, and long-term safety. Future clinical translation requires rigorous standardization of therapeutic parameters, comprehensive safety assessment, and well-designed human trials to validate experimental findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12013-025-01824-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12013-025-01824-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

缺血再灌注损伤(IRI)是一种以缺血后血流恢复过程中线粒体功能障碍和氧化还原失衡为特征的重大临床挑战。这篇综述提供了一个关键的分析,臭氧疗法的新兴作用,在IRI管理通过其独特的刺激特性。最近的研究已经改变了我们对臭氧的理解——传统上认为臭氧是有害的——揭示了通过剂量依赖效应的控制给药显示出显著的治疗潜力。定量分析显示,低剂量臭氧暴露(10-40µg/mL)可显著降低氧化应激标志物,同时增加多个器官系统的抗氧化酶活性。这种保护作用主要通过增强核因子红细胞2相关因子2的活性来表现,调控关键保护酶的上调,同时抑制过度的核因子κ B介导的炎症。目前的证据表明,心血管系统、消化系统、泌尿生殖系统和大脑系统具有一致的保护作用,效应大小从中等到较大。然而,批判性分析揭示了显著的局限性,包括主要依赖动物模型(95%的研究),缺乏标准化的方案,以及有限的人类临床数据。安全性评估表明,治疗窗口较窄,10-40µg/mL时观察到有益效果,但剂量为bb0 - 80µg/mL时可能产生毒性。这篇综述表明,虽然臭氧疗法通过对细胞应激反应的辐射调节在IRI中显示出有希望的实验效果,但在最佳剂量、给药方案和长期安全性方面存在大量研究空白。未来的临床翻译需要严格标准化的治疗参数、全面的安全性评估和精心设计的人体试验来验证实验结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond Paradox: Ozone Therapy as a Hormetic Modulator in Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury - An Update.

Ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) represents a significant clinical challenge characterized by mitochondrial dysfunction and redox imbalance during blood flow restoration following ischemia. This review provides a critical analysis of ozone therapy's emerging role in IRI management through its unique hormetic properties. Recent research has transformed our understanding of ozone-traditionally considered harmful-revealing that controlled administration demonstrates remarkable therapeutic potential through dose-dependent effects. Quantitative analysis reveals that low-dose ozone exposure (10-40 µg/mL) significantly reduces oxidative stress markers while increasing antioxidant enzyme activity across multiple organ systems. The protective effects manifest primarily through enhanced Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 activity, orchestrating upregulation of key protective enzymes while suppressing excessive nuclear factor kappa B mediated inflammation. Current evidence demonstrates consistent protective effects across cardiovascular, digestive, urogenital, and cerebral systems, with effect sizes ranging from moderate to large. However, critical analysis reveals significant limitations including predominant reliance on animal models (>95% of studies), lack of standardized protocols, and limited human clinical data. Safety assessment indicates a narrow therapeutic window, with beneficial effects observed at 10-40 µg/mL but potential toxicity at doses >80 µg/mL. This review establishes that while ozone therapy shows promising experimental efficacy in IRI through hormetic modulation of cellular stress responses, substantial research gaps exist regarding optimal dosing, administration protocols, and long-term safety. Future clinical translation requires rigorous standardization of therapeutic parameters, comprehensive safety assessment, and well-designed human trials to validate experimental findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics
Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics (CBB) aims to publish papers on the nature of the biochemical and biophysical mechanisms underlying the structure, control and function of cellular systems The reports should be within the framework of modern biochemistry and chemistry, biophysics and cell physiology, physics and engineering, molecular and structural biology. The relationship between molecular structure and function under investigation is emphasized. Examples of subject areas that CBB publishes are: · biochemical and biophysical aspects of cell structure and function; · interactions of cells and their molecular/macromolecular constituents; · innovative developments in genetic and biomolecular engineering; · computer-based analysis of tissues, cells, cell networks, organelles, and molecular/macromolecular assemblies; · photometric, spectroscopic, microscopic, mechanical, and electrical methodologies/techniques in analytical cytology, cytometry and innovative instrument design For articles that focus on computational aspects, authors should be clear about which docking and molecular dynamics algorithms or software packages are being used as well as details on the system parameterization, simulations conditions etc. In addition, docking calculations (virtual screening, QSAR, etc.) should be validated either by experimental studies or one or more reliable theoretical cross-validation methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信