体重增加与围产期死亡风险的解释:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 8 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Obesity Reviews Pub Date : 2025-07-10 DOI:10.1111/obr.13981
Yu Tang, Nabil Islam, Rong Luo, Shi Wu Wen, Desheng Zhai, Ying Zhao, Laura M Gaudet, Yanfang Guo, Xiaoping Lei
{"title":"体重增加与围产期死亡风险的解释:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Yu Tang, Nabil Islam, Rong Luo, Shi Wu Wen, Desheng Zhai, Ying Zhao, Laura M Gaudet, Yanfang Guo, Xiaoping Lei","doi":"10.1111/obr.13981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The link between interpregnancy weight gain (IPWG) and perinatal death remains unclear. This meta-analysis examines the impact of interpregnancy body mass index (BMI) increase on perinatal mortality. A comprehensive search was conducted in July 2024 across MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Observational studies quantitatively reporting IPWG and associated perinatal mortality outcomes were included. IPWG was defined as a weight gain of ≥ 2 BMI units or moving to a higher BMI category between consecutive pregnancies. The risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Random effects meta-analyses were performed to generate pooled adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The analysis included 10 studies (3,072,698 pregnancies). The primary outcome was perinatal death (deaths occurring at ≥ 20 weeks of gestation up to 28 days postpartum). Secondary outcomes were stillbirth (intrauterine fetal death at ≥ 20 weeks) and neonatal death (deaths among live-born infants within 28 days of life). IPWG significantly increases the risk of perinatal death (aOR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.32-1.69), stillbirth (aOR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.23-1.72), and neonatal death (aOR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.19-1.61), compared to stable interpregnancy weight. These findings suggest that IPWG may increase the risk of perinatal death, highlighting the importance of weight management counseling during the interpregnancy period.</p>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e13981"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interpregnancy Weight Gain and Risks of Perinatal Death: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yu Tang, Nabil Islam, Rong Luo, Shi Wu Wen, Desheng Zhai, Ying Zhao, Laura M Gaudet, Yanfang Guo, Xiaoping Lei\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/obr.13981\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The link between interpregnancy weight gain (IPWG) and perinatal death remains unclear. This meta-analysis examines the impact of interpregnancy body mass index (BMI) increase on perinatal mortality. A comprehensive search was conducted in July 2024 across MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Observational studies quantitatively reporting IPWG and associated perinatal mortality outcomes were included. IPWG was defined as a weight gain of ≥ 2 BMI units or moving to a higher BMI category between consecutive pregnancies. The risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Random effects meta-analyses were performed to generate pooled adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The analysis included 10 studies (3,072,698 pregnancies). The primary outcome was perinatal death (deaths occurring at ≥ 20 weeks of gestation up to 28 days postpartum). Secondary outcomes were stillbirth (intrauterine fetal death at ≥ 20 weeks) and neonatal death (deaths among live-born infants within 28 days of life). IPWG significantly increases the risk of perinatal death (aOR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.32-1.69), stillbirth (aOR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.23-1.72), and neonatal death (aOR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.19-1.61), compared to stable interpregnancy weight. These findings suggest that IPWG may increase the risk of perinatal death, highlighting the importance of weight management counseling during the interpregnancy period.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obesity Reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e13981\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obesity Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13981\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13981","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

解释性体重增加(IPWG)与围产期死亡之间的联系尚不清楚。本荟萃分析探讨了解释性体重指数(BMI)增加对围产期死亡率的影响。我们于2024年7月对MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane Library和Web of Science进行了全面的检索。定量报告IPWG和相关围产期死亡率结果的观察性研究被纳入。IPWG被定义为连续怀孕期间体重增加≥2个BMI单位或进入更高的BMI类别。使用ROBINS-I工具评估偏倚风险。随机效应荟萃分析产生合并校正优势比(aORs)和95%置信区间(ci)。该分析包括10项研究(3,072,698例妊娠)。主要结局为围产期死亡(死亡发生在妊娠≥20周至产后28天)。次要结局是死产(≥20周宫内胎儿死亡)和新生儿死亡(28天内活产婴儿死亡)。IPWG显著增加围产期死亡风险(aOR, 1.49;95% CI, 1.32-1.69),死产(aOR, 1.46;95% CI, 1.23-1.72)和新生儿死亡(aOR, 1.39;95% CI, 1.19-1.61),与稳定的解释性权重相比。这些发现提示IPWG可能会增加围产期死亡的风险,强调了孕期体重管理咨询的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interpregnancy Weight Gain and Risks of Perinatal Death: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The link between interpregnancy weight gain (IPWG) and perinatal death remains unclear. This meta-analysis examines the impact of interpregnancy body mass index (BMI) increase on perinatal mortality. A comprehensive search was conducted in July 2024 across MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Observational studies quantitatively reporting IPWG and associated perinatal mortality outcomes were included. IPWG was defined as a weight gain of ≥ 2 BMI units or moving to a higher BMI category between consecutive pregnancies. The risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Random effects meta-analyses were performed to generate pooled adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The analysis included 10 studies (3,072,698 pregnancies). The primary outcome was perinatal death (deaths occurring at ≥ 20 weeks of gestation up to 28 days postpartum). Secondary outcomes were stillbirth (intrauterine fetal death at ≥ 20 weeks) and neonatal death (deaths among live-born infants within 28 days of life). IPWG significantly increases the risk of perinatal death (aOR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.32-1.69), stillbirth (aOR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.23-1.72), and neonatal death (aOR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.19-1.61), compared to stable interpregnancy weight. These findings suggest that IPWG may increase the risk of perinatal death, highlighting the importance of weight management counseling during the interpregnancy period.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity Reviews
Obesity Reviews 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
19.30
自引率
1.10%
发文量
130
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Obesity Reviews is a monthly journal publishing reviews on all disciplines related to obesity and its comorbidities. This includes basic and behavioral sciences, clinical treatment and outcomes, epidemiology, prevention and public health. The journal should, therefore, appeal to all professionals with an interest in obesity and its comorbidities. Review types may include systematic narrative reviews, quantitative meta-analyses and narrative reviews but all must offer new insights, critical or novel perspectives that will enhance the state of knowledge in the field. The editorial policy is to publish high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts that provide needed new insight into all aspects of obesity and its related comorbidities while minimizing the period between submission and publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信