{"title":"人类世及其竞争者：国家分裂人类的跨学科工具","authors":"Daniele Conversi","doi":"10.1029/2024EF004918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Building on two essays previously published in <i>Earth's Future</i>, this Commentary aims to further and expand the debate by considering two indirectly correlated aspects: <i>interdisciplinarity</i> and <i>internationalism</i>, both of which can find a powerful ally in the notion of the Anthropocene. The two essays respectively address the cross-disciplinary/trans-disciplinary reach of the Anthropocene (Zalasiewicz et al. 2021, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020ef001896) and its popular expansion and acceptance (Żuk & Żuk, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023ef004045). The Commentary shows how the Anthropocene has produced an overarching narrative which is potentially enabling in a world divided by nationalism and where science is fractured by disciplinary boundaries. It suggests how the Anthropocene concept may be more effectively understood and used in relationship to these two dimensions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48748,"journal":{"name":"Earths Future","volume":"13 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024EF004918","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Anthropocene and Its Contenders: Cross-Disciplinary Tools for a Nationally Divided Humanity\",\"authors\":\"Daniele Conversi\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024EF004918\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Building on two essays previously published in <i>Earth's Future</i>, this Commentary aims to further and expand the debate by considering two indirectly correlated aspects: <i>interdisciplinarity</i> and <i>internationalism</i>, both of which can find a powerful ally in the notion of the Anthropocene. The two essays respectively address the cross-disciplinary/trans-disciplinary reach of the Anthropocene (Zalasiewicz et al. 2021, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020ef001896) and its popular expansion and acceptance (Żuk & Żuk, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023ef004045). The Commentary shows how the Anthropocene has produced an overarching narrative which is potentially enabling in a world divided by nationalism and where science is fractured by disciplinary boundaries. It suggests how the Anthropocene concept may be more effectively understood and used in relationship to these two dimensions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earths Future\",\"volume\":\"13 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024EF004918\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earths Future\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024EF004918\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earths Future","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024EF004918","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在之前发表在《地球的未来》上的两篇文章的基础上，本评论旨在通过考虑两个间接相关的方面来进一步扩大辩论：跨学科和国际主义，这两个方面都可以在人类世的概念中找到一个强大的盟友。这两篇文章分别论述了人类世的跨学科/跨学科范围（Zalasiewicz et al. 2021, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020ef001896）及其广泛的扩展和接受(Żuk &；Żuk, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023ef004045)。《评论》展示了人类世如何产生了一种总体叙事，这种叙事可能在一个被民族主义分裂、科学因学科界限而断裂的世界中发挥作用。它提出了如何更有效地理解和使用人类世概念与这两个维度的关系。
The Anthropocene and Its Contenders: Cross-Disciplinary Tools for a Nationally Divided Humanity
Building on two essays previously published in Earth's Future, this Commentary aims to further and expand the debate by considering two indirectly correlated aspects: interdisciplinarity and internationalism, both of which can find a powerful ally in the notion of the Anthropocene. The two essays respectively address the cross-disciplinary/trans-disciplinary reach of the Anthropocene (Zalasiewicz et al. 2021, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020ef001896) and its popular expansion and acceptance (Żuk & Żuk, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023ef004045). The Commentary shows how the Anthropocene has produced an overarching narrative which is potentially enabling in a world divided by nationalism and where science is fractured by disciplinary boundaries. It suggests how the Anthropocene concept may be more effectively understood and used in relationship to these two dimensions.
期刊介绍：
Earth’s Future: A transdisciplinary open access journal, Earth’s Future focuses on the state of the Earth and the prediction of the planet’s future. By publishing peer-reviewed articles as well as editorials, essays, reviews, and commentaries, this journal will be the preeminent scholarly resource on the Anthropocene. It will also help assess the risks and opportunities associated with environmental changes and challenges.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
