平行边界间安全的常和高阶障碍函数

IF 2 Q2 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS
Kwang Hak Kim;Mamadou Diagne;Miroslav Krstić
{"title":"平行边界间安全的常和高阶障碍函数","authors":"Kwang Hak Kim;Mamadou Diagne;Miroslav Krstić","doi":"10.1109/LCSYS.2025.3583748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This letter takes a step towards addressing the difficulty of constructing Control Barrier Functions (CBFs) for parallel safety boundaries. A single CBF for both boundaries has been reported to be difficult to validate for safety, and we identify why this challenge is inherent. To overcome this, the proposed method constructs separate CBFs for each boundary. We begin by presenting results for the relative degree one case and then extend these to higher relative degrees using the CBF backstepping technique, establishing conditions that guarantee safety. Finally, we showcase our method by applying it to a unicycle system, deriving a simple, verifiable condition to validate the target CBFs for direct implementation of our results.","PeriodicalId":37235,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Control Systems Letters","volume":"9 ","pages":"1447-1452"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constant-Sum High-Order Barrier Functions for Safety Between Parallel Boundaries\",\"authors\":\"Kwang Hak Kim;Mamadou Diagne;Miroslav Krstić\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LCSYS.2025.3583748\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This letter takes a step towards addressing the difficulty of constructing Control Barrier Functions (CBFs) for parallel safety boundaries. A single CBF for both boundaries has been reported to be difficult to validate for safety, and we identify why this challenge is inherent. To overcome this, the proposed method constructs separate CBFs for each boundary. We begin by presenting results for the relative degree one case and then extend these to higher relative degrees using the CBF backstepping technique, establishing conditions that guarantee safety. Finally, we showcase our method by applying it to a unicycle system, deriving a simple, verifiable condition to validate the target CBFs for direct implementation of our results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Control Systems Letters\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"1447-1452\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Control Systems Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11054265/\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Control Systems Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11054265/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这封信朝着解决构建平行安全边界的控制屏障函数(cbf)的困难迈出了一步。据报道,两个边界的单一CBF很难验证安全性,我们确定了为什么这一挑战是固有的。为了克服这个问题,该方法为每个边界构建了单独的cbf。我们首先给出相对度为1的情况下的结果,然后使用CBF反推技术将这些结果扩展到更高的相对度,建立保证安全的条件。最后,我们通过将其应用于独轮车系统来展示我们的方法,推导出一个简单的、可验证的条件来验证目标cbf,以直接实现我们的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Constant-Sum High-Order Barrier Functions for Safety Between Parallel Boundaries
This letter takes a step towards addressing the difficulty of constructing Control Barrier Functions (CBFs) for parallel safety boundaries. A single CBF for both boundaries has been reported to be difficult to validate for safety, and we identify why this challenge is inherent. To overcome this, the proposed method constructs separate CBFs for each boundary. We begin by presenting results for the relative degree one case and then extend these to higher relative degrees using the CBF backstepping technique, establishing conditions that guarantee safety. Finally, we showcase our method by applying it to a unicycle system, deriving a simple, verifiable condition to validate the target CBFs for direct implementation of our results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Control Systems Letters
IEEE Control Systems Letters Mathematics-Control and Optimization
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
471
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信