用学生个体特征和师生关系解释教师对学生主观幸福感判断的准确性

IF 9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Carmen L.A. Zurbriggen , Susanne Schwab , Isabelle Kalkusch , Alex Neuhauser , Andrea Lanfranchi , Peter Klaver
{"title":"用学生个体特征和师生关系解释教师对学生主观幸福感判断的准确性","authors":"Carmen L.A. Zurbriggen ,&nbsp;Susanne Schwab ,&nbsp;Isabelle Kalkusch ,&nbsp;Alex Neuhauser ,&nbsp;Andrea Lanfranchi ,&nbsp;Peter Klaver","doi":"10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates whether individual student characteristics and the teacher-student relationship can explain teachers' judgment (in)accuracy of three aspects of students' subjective well-being in early primary education. To this end, we analyse the consistency and specificity of teacher reports and self-reports (<em>N</em> = 1582) of Grade 3 students' subjective well-being by employing a multiple-indicator correlated trait-correlated method minus one model, with explanatory variables assessed in Grades 1 and 3. Our findings indicate that the consistency of teacher reports with students' self-reports is relatively low to moderate. Students' gender, academic achievement, intelligence and behavioural skills are significantly associated with the specificity of teacher reports of students' subjective well-being. The teacher-student relationship explains the specificity in teacher reports, with negative associations for conflicts and positive associations for closeness. This study highlights the relevance of behavioural skills and the teacher-student relationship for the alignment between teachers' judgment and self-reports of students' subjective well-being.</div></div><div><h3>Educational relevance and implications statement</h3><div>Accurate teacher judgment of students' subjective well-being is essential for addressing individual differences and for adaptive teaching, which in turn promotes students' academic and socio-emotional development. The findings of this study reveal that teachers' judgment accuracy of students' subjective well-being in Grade 3 is only low to moderate. Students' gender, academic achievement, intelligence and behavioural skills assessed in Grades 1 and 3 significantly relate to teachers' judgment (in-)accuracy of students' subjective well-being. Furthermore, a conflicting teacher-student relationship is negatively associated with teachers' judgment accuracy, while closeness is positively associated. As one of the first studies, our findings point to a nuanced role of student behaviours and teacher-student relationships in shaping teachers' judgments of students' subjective well-being.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48336,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Individual Differences","volume":"122 ","pages":"Article 102754"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Explaining teachers' judgement accuracy of students' subjective well-being by students' individual characteristics and the teacher-student relationship\",\"authors\":\"Carmen L.A. Zurbriggen ,&nbsp;Susanne Schwab ,&nbsp;Isabelle Kalkusch ,&nbsp;Alex Neuhauser ,&nbsp;Andrea Lanfranchi ,&nbsp;Peter Klaver\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102754\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study investigates whether individual student characteristics and the teacher-student relationship can explain teachers' judgment (in)accuracy of three aspects of students' subjective well-being in early primary education. To this end, we analyse the consistency and specificity of teacher reports and self-reports (<em>N</em> = 1582) of Grade 3 students' subjective well-being by employing a multiple-indicator correlated trait-correlated method minus one model, with explanatory variables assessed in Grades 1 and 3. Our findings indicate that the consistency of teacher reports with students' self-reports is relatively low to moderate. Students' gender, academic achievement, intelligence and behavioural skills are significantly associated with the specificity of teacher reports of students' subjective well-being. The teacher-student relationship explains the specificity in teacher reports, with negative associations for conflicts and positive associations for closeness. This study highlights the relevance of behavioural skills and the teacher-student relationship for the alignment between teachers' judgment and self-reports of students' subjective well-being.</div></div><div><h3>Educational relevance and implications statement</h3><div>Accurate teacher judgment of students' subjective well-being is essential for addressing individual differences and for adaptive teaching, which in turn promotes students' academic and socio-emotional development. The findings of this study reveal that teachers' judgment accuracy of students' subjective well-being in Grade 3 is only low to moderate. Students' gender, academic achievement, intelligence and behavioural skills assessed in Grades 1 and 3 significantly relate to teachers' judgment (in-)accuracy of students' subjective well-being. Furthermore, a conflicting teacher-student relationship is negatively associated with teachers' judgment accuracy, while closeness is positively associated. As one of the first studies, our findings point to a nuanced role of student behaviours and teacher-student relationships in shaping teachers' judgments of students' subjective well-being.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning and Individual Differences\",\"volume\":\"122 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102754\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning and Individual Differences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S104160802500130X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S104160802500130X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨小学早期教育中,学生个体特征和师生关系是否能解释教师对学生主观幸福感三个方面判断的准确性。为此,我们采用多指标相关特质相关法减一模型,对三年级学生主观幸福感的教师报告和自我报告(N = 1582)的一致性和特异性进行了分析,并在一年级和三年级评估了解释变量。我们的研究结果表明,教师报告与学生自我报告的一致性相对较低至中等。学生的性别、学业成就、智力和行为技能与教师报告学生主观幸福感的特异性显著相关。师生关系解释了教师报告的特殊性,与冲突负相关,与亲密正相关。本研究强调行为技能和师生关系对于教师判断与学生主观幸福感自我报告之间的一致性的相关性。教师对学生主观幸福感的准确判断对于解决个体差异和适应性教学至关重要,而适应性教学反过来又促进了学生的学业和社会情感发展。本研究发现,三年级教师对学生主观幸福感的判断准确率仅为低至中等。一年级和三年级学生的性别、学业成绩、智力和行为技能与教师对学生主观幸福感判断的准确性显著相关。此外,冲突师生关系与教师的判断准确性呈负相关,而亲密关系与教师的判断准确性呈正相关。作为首批研究之一,我们的发现指出了学生行为和师生关系在塑造教师对学生主观幸福感的判断方面的微妙作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Explaining teachers' judgement accuracy of students' subjective well-being by students' individual characteristics and the teacher-student relationship
This study investigates whether individual student characteristics and the teacher-student relationship can explain teachers' judgment (in)accuracy of three aspects of students' subjective well-being in early primary education. To this end, we analyse the consistency and specificity of teacher reports and self-reports (N = 1582) of Grade 3 students' subjective well-being by employing a multiple-indicator correlated trait-correlated method minus one model, with explanatory variables assessed in Grades 1 and 3. Our findings indicate that the consistency of teacher reports with students' self-reports is relatively low to moderate. Students' gender, academic achievement, intelligence and behavioural skills are significantly associated with the specificity of teacher reports of students' subjective well-being. The teacher-student relationship explains the specificity in teacher reports, with negative associations for conflicts and positive associations for closeness. This study highlights the relevance of behavioural skills and the teacher-student relationship for the alignment between teachers' judgment and self-reports of students' subjective well-being.

Educational relevance and implications statement

Accurate teacher judgment of students' subjective well-being is essential for addressing individual differences and for adaptive teaching, which in turn promotes students' academic and socio-emotional development. The findings of this study reveal that teachers' judgment accuracy of students' subjective well-being in Grade 3 is only low to moderate. Students' gender, academic achievement, intelligence and behavioural skills assessed in Grades 1 and 3 significantly relate to teachers' judgment (in-)accuracy of students' subjective well-being. Furthermore, a conflicting teacher-student relationship is negatively associated with teachers' judgment accuracy, while closeness is positively associated. As one of the first studies, our findings point to a nuanced role of student behaviours and teacher-student relationships in shaping teachers' judgments of students' subjective well-being.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Learning and Individual Differences
Learning and Individual Differences PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Learning and Individual Differences is a research journal devoted to publishing articles of individual differences as they relate to learning within an educational context. The Journal focuses on original empirical studies of high theoretical and methodological rigor that that make a substantial scientific contribution. Learning and Individual Differences publishes original research. Manuscripts should be no longer than 7500 words of primary text (not including tables, figures, references).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信