商业生态系统治理、数字能力与企业数字创新绩效——来自中国的实证数据

IF 3.9 3区管理学 Q2 BUSINESS

Journal of Engineering and Technology Management Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2025.101900

Jingtao Liu , Qifang Gao , Lidong Zhu

{"title":"商业生态系统治理、数字能力与企业数字创新绩效——来自中国的实证数据","authors":"Jingtao Liu , Qifang Gao , Lidong Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.jengtecman.2025.101900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Business ecosystems serve as a critical platform for firms to accumulate innovation resources, co-create value with stakeholders, and achieve innovation outcomes. Strengthening ecosystem governance can mitigate issues like \"free-riding\" and optimize the overall functioning of the ecosystem. Enhancing digital innovation performance through effective ecosystem governance has become a key strategy for complementary firms seeking innovation and growth. This study investigates how complementary firms within business ecosystems adapt to governance mechanisms to boost digital innovation performance. A survey of 684 complementary firms within the business ecosystem was conducted, with multiple regression analysis applied to examine the impact of ecosystem governance on digital innovation performance from the complementary firms' perspective. The analysis also explores the mediating role of digital capabilities and the moderating effect of technological dynamism. The findings indicate that: (1) both contractual and relational governance positively and significantly influence digital innovation performance; (2) digital perceptual capabilities and digital resource coordination capabilities mediate the relationship between ecosystem governance and digital innovation performance of complementary firms; (3) technological dynamism negatively moderates the relationship between contractual governance and digital capabilities, but does not influence the relationship between relational governance and digital capabilities. This research advances the understanding of the relationship between ecosystem governance and digital innovation performance in the context of the digital economy, offering insights from the perspective of complementary firms and highlighting the complex mechanisms through which ecosystem governance affects their digital innovation outcomes. The conclusions provide practical implications for complementary firms aiming to enhance their digital innovation performance within the digital economy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50209,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering and Technology Management","volume":"77 ","pages":"Article 101900"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Business ecosystem governance, digital capabilities, and enterprises' digital innovation performance -Empirical data from China\",\"authors\":\"Jingtao Liu , Qifang Gao , Lidong Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jengtecman.2025.101900\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Business ecosystems serve as a critical platform for firms to accumulate innovation resources, co-create value with stakeholders, and achieve innovation outcomes. Strengthening ecosystem governance can mitigate issues like \\\"free-riding\\\" and optimize the overall functioning of the ecosystem. Enhancing digital innovation performance through effective ecosystem governance has become a key strategy for complementary firms seeking innovation and growth. This study investigates how complementary firms within business ecosystems adapt to governance mechanisms to boost digital innovation performance. A survey of 684 complementary firms within the business ecosystem was conducted, with multiple regression analysis applied to examine the impact of ecosystem governance on digital innovation performance from the complementary firms' perspective. The analysis also explores the mediating role of digital capabilities and the moderating effect of technological dynamism. The findings indicate that: (1) both contractual and relational governance positively and significantly influence digital innovation performance; (2) digital perceptual capabilities and digital resource coordination capabilities mediate the relationship between ecosystem governance and digital innovation performance of complementary firms; (3) technological dynamism negatively moderates the relationship between contractual governance and digital capabilities, but does not influence the relationship between relational governance and digital capabilities. This research advances the understanding of the relationship between ecosystem governance and digital innovation performance in the context of the digital economy, offering insights from the perspective of complementary firms and highlighting the complex mechanisms through which ecosystem governance affects their digital innovation outcomes. The conclusions provide practical implications for complementary firms aiming to enhance their digital innovation performance within the digital economy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Engineering and Technology Management\",\"volume\":\"77 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101900\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Engineering and Technology Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0923474825000414\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering and Technology Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0923474825000414","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

商业生态系统是企业积累创新资源、与利益相关者共同创造价值、实现创新成果的重要平台。加强生态系统治理可以缓解“搭便车”等问题，优化生态系统的整体功能。通过有效的生态系统治理来提高数字创新绩效已经成为互补性企业寻求创新和增长的关键战略。本研究探讨了商业生态系统内互补性企业如何适应治理机制以提高数字创新绩效。通过对684家互补型企业的调查，运用多元回归分析，从互补型企业的角度考察生态系统治理对数字创新绩效的影响。分析还探讨了数字能力的中介作用和技术动态性的调节作用。研究结果表明：(1)契约治理和关系治理对数字创新绩效均有显著正向影响；(2)数字感知能力和数字资源协调能力在生态系统治理与互补企业数字创新绩效之间起中介作用；(3)技术动态性负向调节契约治理与数字能力的关系，不影响关系治理与数字能力的关系。本研究从互补性企业的角度提供了见解，并强调了生态系统治理影响数字创新成果的复杂机制，促进了对数字经济背景下生态系统治理与数字创新绩效之间关系的理解。这些结论对旨在提高数字经济中数字创新绩效的互补性企业具有现实意义。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Business ecosystem governance, digital capabilities, and enterprises' digital innovation performance -Empirical data from China

Business ecosystems serve as a critical platform for firms to accumulate innovation resources, co-create value with stakeholders, and achieve innovation outcomes. Strengthening ecosystem governance can mitigate issues like "free-riding" and optimize the overall functioning of the ecosystem. Enhancing digital innovation performance through effective ecosystem governance has become a key strategy for complementary firms seeking innovation and growth. This study investigates how complementary firms within business ecosystems adapt to governance mechanisms to boost digital innovation performance. A survey of 684 complementary firms within the business ecosystem was conducted, with multiple regression analysis applied to examine the impact of ecosystem governance on digital innovation performance from the complementary firms' perspective. The analysis also explores the mediating role of digital capabilities and the moderating effect of technological dynamism. The findings indicate that: (1) both contractual and relational governance positively and significantly influence digital innovation performance; (2) digital perceptual capabilities and digital resource coordination capabilities mediate the relationship between ecosystem governance and digital innovation performance of complementary firms; (3) technological dynamism negatively moderates the relationship between contractual governance and digital capabilities, but does not influence the relationship between relational governance and digital capabilities. This research advances the understanding of the relationship between ecosystem governance and digital innovation performance in the context of the digital economy, offering insights from the perspective of complementary firms and highlighting the complex mechanisms through which ecosystem governance affects their digital innovation outcomes. The conclusions provide practical implications for complementary firms aiming to enhance their digital innovation performance within the digital economy.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 管理科学-工程：工业

CiteScore

8.00

自引率

6.20%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： The Journal of Engineering and Technology Management (JET-M) is an international scholarly refereed research journal which aims to promote the theory and practice of technology, innovation, and engineering management. The journal links engineering, science, and management disciplines. It addresses the issues involved in the planning, development, and implementation of technological capabilities to shape and accomplish the strategic and operational objectives of an organization. It covers not only R&D management, but also the entire spectrum of managerial concerns in technology-based organizations. This includes issues relating to new product development, human resource management, innovation process management, project management, technological fusion, marketing, technological forecasting and strategic planning. The journal provides an interface between technology and other corporate functions, such as R&D, marketing, manufacturing and administration. Its ultimate goal is to make a profound contribution to theory development, research and practice by serving as a leading forum for the publication of scholarly research on all aspects of technology, innovation, and engineering management.