对林俊红、林颖凡“错误假设：通过各向异性断裂带模拟地下水”的评析

IF 6.3 1区地球科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL

Journal of Hydrology Pub Date : 2025-07-10 DOI:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133728

Erik I. Anderson , Mark Bakker

{"title":"对林俊红、林颖凡“错误假设：通过各向异性断裂带模拟地下水”的评析","authors":"Erik I. Anderson , Mark Bakker","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Lin and Lin (<em>Faulty assumptions: Groundwater modeling through anisotropic fault zones, Journal of Hydrology 653(2025)</em>) make unfounded claims about earlier studies of fault aquifer interaction: they state that the standard boundary conditions for a conductive fault used in earlier studies are flawed or based on faulty assumptions and that the earlier studies did not consider the discontinuities in both the normal component of flow and hydraulic head across a general fault. Further, they are unclear about the approximations in their own analysis which attempts to replace the two-dimensional flow field within a thin, anisotropic fault zone with two, one-dimensional, internal boundary conditions. Their claims about earlier studies are refuted and the approximations in their analysis are examined. Despite the limitations of their analysis, the work of Lin and Lin has value.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"662 ","pages":"Article 133728"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comment on ”Faulty assumptions: Groundwater modeling through anisotropic fault zones” by Jun-Hong Lin and Ying-Fan Lin\",\"authors\":\"Erik I. Anderson , Mark Bakker\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133728\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Lin and Lin (<em>Faulty assumptions: Groundwater modeling through anisotropic fault zones, Journal of Hydrology 653(2025)</em>) make unfounded claims about earlier studies of fault aquifer interaction: they state that the standard boundary conditions for a conductive fault used in earlier studies are flawed or based on faulty assumptions and that the earlier studies did not consider the discontinuities in both the normal component of flow and hydraulic head across a general fault. Further, they are unclear about the approximations in their own analysis which attempts to replace the two-dimensional flow field within a thin, anisotropic fault zone with two, one-dimensional, internal boundary conditions. Their claims about earlier studies are refuted and the approximations in their analysis are examined. Despite the limitations of their analysis, the work of Lin and Lin has value.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hydrology\",\"volume\":\"662 \",\"pages\":\"Article 133728\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hydrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425010662\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425010662","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

Lin和Lin（错误的假设：通过各向异性断裂带进行地下水建模，《水文学杂志》653(2025)）对断层含水层相互作用的早期研究提出了毫无根据的主张：他们指出，早期研究中使用的导电断层的标准边界条件是有缺陷的，或者是基于错误的假设，并且早期的研究没有考虑到流经一般断层的正常流量和水头的不连续性。此外，他们不清楚自己分析中的近似，这些近似试图用二维、一维的内部边界条件取代薄的各向异性断裂带内的二维流场。他们对早期研究的主张被驳斥，他们分析中的近似值被检验。尽管他们的分析有局限性，但他们的工作是有价值的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Comment on ”Faulty assumptions: Groundwater modeling through anisotropic fault zones” by Jun-Hong Lin and Ying-Fan Lin

Lin and Lin (Faulty assumptions: Groundwater modeling through anisotropic fault zones, Journal of Hydrology 653(2025)) make unfounded claims about earlier studies of fault aquifer interaction: they state that the standard boundary conditions for a conductive fault used in earlier studies are flawed or based on faulty assumptions and that the earlier studies did not consider the discontinuities in both the normal component of flow and hydraulic head across a general fault. Further, they are unclear about the approximations in their own analysis which attempts to replace the two-dimensional flow field within a thin, anisotropic fault zone with two, one-dimensional, internal boundary conditions. Their claims about earlier studies are refuted and the approximations in their analysis are examined. Despite the limitations of their analysis, the work of Lin and Lin has value.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Hydrology 地学-地球科学综合

CiteScore

11.00

自引率

12.50%

发文量

1309

审稿时长

7.5 months

期刊介绍： The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.