房颤患者住院和保健利用的性别差异。医疗保健利用和房颤的性别差异

IF 2.5 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Melissa E. Middeldorp , Colinda van Deutekom , Liann I. Weil , Isabelle C. Van Gelder , Ursula W. De Ruijter , Patrick T. Jeurissen , Emelia J. Benjamin , Barbara C. van Munster , Michiel Rienstra
{"title":"房颤患者住院和保健利用的性别差异。医疗保健利用和房颤的性别差异","authors":"Melissa E. Middeldorp ,&nbsp;Colinda van Deutekom ,&nbsp;Liann I. Weil ,&nbsp;Isabelle C. Van Gelder ,&nbsp;Ursula W. De Ruijter ,&nbsp;Patrick T. Jeurissen ,&nbsp;Emelia J. Benjamin ,&nbsp;Barbara C. van Munster ,&nbsp;Michiel Rienstra","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcha.2025.101748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>There is limited data on sex differences in healthcare utilization among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed to assess the association of sex and age on healthcare utilization in AF patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective analysis of electronic health records from three hospitals in the Netherlands, including all patients ≥ 18 years with at least one healthcare encounter (outpatient, emergency visit, or inpatient stay). AF diagnoses were identified using ICD-10 codes linked with the Dutch Hospital Data Clinical Classification Software.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 226,991 patients, 5127 (2.3 %) had AF (44 % females, mean age 68 ± 12 years). There were no sex differences in outpatient, emergency, or inpatient visits overall. However, females aged 18–59 had more outpatient visits compared to males (6.1 ± 7.9 vs 4.8 ± 5.2, p = 0.001). In contrast, females aged ≥ 75 had fewer outpatient visits (7.2 vs 8.4, p &lt; 0.001) and inpatient days (4.8 vs 5.8, p = 0.027) compared to males. After multivariable adjustment, both sexes aged ≥ 75 had increased risks of inpatient stays (Females: OR 2.53, 95 % CI 2.30–2.78; Males: OR 1.49, 95 % CI 1.46–1.62) and emergency visits (Females: OR 2.14, 95 % CI 1.94–2.35; Males: OR 1.13, 95 % CI 1.03–1.24). Significant interactions between sex and age were found, with females having higher odds of inpatient days (OR 1.99, p &lt; 0.001) and emergency visits (OR 1.23, p &lt; 0.001) compared to males.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>While no overall sex differences in healthcare utilization were found, significant age-related differences were observed, with females having higher hospital utilization rates, particularly for inpatient stays and emergency visits.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38026,"journal":{"name":"IJC Heart and Vasculature","volume":"60 ","pages":"Article 101748"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex differences in hospitalisation and healthcare utilisation for patients with atrial fibrillation Middeldorp et al. Sex differences in healthcare utilisation and AF\",\"authors\":\"Melissa E. Middeldorp ,&nbsp;Colinda van Deutekom ,&nbsp;Liann I. Weil ,&nbsp;Isabelle C. Van Gelder ,&nbsp;Ursula W. De Ruijter ,&nbsp;Patrick T. Jeurissen ,&nbsp;Emelia J. Benjamin ,&nbsp;Barbara C. van Munster ,&nbsp;Michiel Rienstra\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijcha.2025.101748\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>There is limited data on sex differences in healthcare utilization among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed to assess the association of sex and age on healthcare utilization in AF patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective analysis of electronic health records from three hospitals in the Netherlands, including all patients ≥ 18 years with at least one healthcare encounter (outpatient, emergency visit, or inpatient stay). AF diagnoses were identified using ICD-10 codes linked with the Dutch Hospital Data Clinical Classification Software.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 226,991 patients, 5127 (2.3 %) had AF (44 % females, mean age 68 ± 12 years). There were no sex differences in outpatient, emergency, or inpatient visits overall. However, females aged 18–59 had more outpatient visits compared to males (6.1 ± 7.9 vs 4.8 ± 5.2, p = 0.001). In contrast, females aged ≥ 75 had fewer outpatient visits (7.2 vs 8.4, p &lt; 0.001) and inpatient days (4.8 vs 5.8, p = 0.027) compared to males. After multivariable adjustment, both sexes aged ≥ 75 had increased risks of inpatient stays (Females: OR 2.53, 95 % CI 2.30–2.78; Males: OR 1.49, 95 % CI 1.46–1.62) and emergency visits (Females: OR 2.14, 95 % CI 1.94–2.35; Males: OR 1.13, 95 % CI 1.03–1.24). Significant interactions between sex and age were found, with females having higher odds of inpatient days (OR 1.99, p &lt; 0.001) and emergency visits (OR 1.23, p &lt; 0.001) compared to males.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>While no overall sex differences in healthcare utilization were found, significant age-related differences were observed, with females having higher hospital utilization rates, particularly for inpatient stays and emergency visits.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IJC Heart and Vasculature\",\"volume\":\"60 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101748\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IJC Heart and Vasculature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352906725001514\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJC Heart and Vasculature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352906725001514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关于房颤(AF)患者医疗保健利用的性别差异的数据有限。本研究旨在评估性别和年龄与房颤患者医疗保健利用的关系。方法:我们对来自荷兰三家医院的电子健康记录进行回顾性分析,包括所有≥18岁且至少有一次医疗保健就诊(门诊、急诊或住院)的患者。使用与荷兰医院数据临床分类软件相关联的ICD-10代码确定房颤诊断。结果226991例患者中,5127例(2.3%)发生房颤,其中女性44%,平均年龄68±12岁。总体而言,门诊、急诊和住院患者的就诊没有性别差异。然而,18-59岁的女性比男性有更多的门诊就诊(6.1±7.9比4.8±5.2,p = 0.001)。相比之下,年龄≥75岁的女性门诊次数较少(7.2 vs 8.4, p <;0.001)和住院天数(4.8 vs 5.8, p = 0.027)。多变量调整后,年龄≥75岁的男女住院风险均增加(女性:OR 2.53, 95% CI 2.30-2.78;男性:OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.46-1.62)和急诊就诊(女性:OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.94-2.35;男性:OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.03-1.24)。性别和年龄之间存在显著的相互作用,女性住院天数的几率更高(OR 1.99, p <;0.001)和急诊就诊(OR 1.23, p <;0.001)。结论:虽然在医疗保健利用方面没有总体的性别差异,但存在显著的年龄相关差异,女性的医院使用率更高,特别是住院和急诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Sex differences in hospitalisation and healthcare utilisation for patients with atrial fibrillation Middeldorp et al. Sex differences in healthcare utilisation and AF

Sex differences in hospitalisation and healthcare utilisation for patients with atrial fibrillation Middeldorp et al. Sex differences in healthcare utilisation and AF

Background

There is limited data on sex differences in healthcare utilization among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed to assess the association of sex and age on healthcare utilization in AF patients.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of electronic health records from three hospitals in the Netherlands, including all patients ≥ 18 years with at least one healthcare encounter (outpatient, emergency visit, or inpatient stay). AF diagnoses were identified using ICD-10 codes linked with the Dutch Hospital Data Clinical Classification Software.

Results

Of 226,991 patients, 5127 (2.3 %) had AF (44 % females, mean age 68 ± 12 years). There were no sex differences in outpatient, emergency, or inpatient visits overall. However, females aged 18–59 had more outpatient visits compared to males (6.1 ± 7.9 vs 4.8 ± 5.2, p = 0.001). In contrast, females aged ≥ 75 had fewer outpatient visits (7.2 vs 8.4, p < 0.001) and inpatient days (4.8 vs 5.8, p = 0.027) compared to males. After multivariable adjustment, both sexes aged ≥ 75 had increased risks of inpatient stays (Females: OR 2.53, 95 % CI 2.30–2.78; Males: OR 1.49, 95 % CI 1.46–1.62) and emergency visits (Females: OR 2.14, 95 % CI 1.94–2.35; Males: OR 1.13, 95 % CI 1.03–1.24). Significant interactions between sex and age were found, with females having higher odds of inpatient days (OR 1.99, p < 0.001) and emergency visits (OR 1.23, p < 0.001) compared to males.

Conclusion

While no overall sex differences in healthcare utilization were found, significant age-related differences were observed, with females having higher hospital utilization rates, particularly for inpatient stays and emergency visits.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IJC Heart and Vasculature
IJC Heart and Vasculature Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
10.30%
发文量
216
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: IJC Heart & Vasculature is an online-only, open-access journal dedicated to publishing original articles and reviews (also Editorials and Letters to the Editor) which report on structural and functional cardiovascular pathology, with an emphasis on imaging and disease pathophysiology. Articles must be authentic, educational, clinically relevant, and original in their content and scientific approach. IJC Heart & Vasculature requires the highest standards of scientific integrity in order to promote reliable, reproducible and verifiable research findings. All authors are advised to consult the Principles of Ethical Publishing in the International Journal of Cardiology before submitting a manuscript. Submission of a manuscript to this journal gives the publisher the right to publish that paper if it is accepted. Manuscripts may be edited to improve clarity and expression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信