{"title":"绘制流动差距:从社会经济角度对可达性和公平性的地理空间分析","authors":"Xiaozheng Sun, Xu Cui","doi":"10.1016/j.trd.2025.104909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores social inequities in urban mobility by examining the accessibility, spatial distribution, and equity of subway systems. Using a multifaceted geospatial network analysis, the research integrates various methodologies to illuminate the complex role of socioeconomic factors in transportation inequalities. A notable result is that methodological choices significantly influence the assessment of transportation equity. The analysis spans both time and urban contexts, encompassing comparisons between four cities and different subway station buffer zones over a ten-year period. Key findings reveal a structured pattern of socioeconomic disparities, with systematic gradients across computational methods. Specifically, (1) income inequality is consistently influenced by the computational approach, with notable gradients across all cities; (2) workforce accessibility displays an urban-centric bias, with urban workers tend to experience longer commutes in practice compared to idealized models; and (3) gender-based workforce segmentation remains a persistent issue but is less sensitive to methodological variations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23277,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment","volume":"146 ","pages":"Article 104909"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mapping mobility gaps: geospatial analysis of accessibility and equity from socioeconomic perspectives\",\"authors\":\"Xiaozheng Sun, Xu Cui\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trd.2025.104909\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study explores social inequities in urban mobility by examining the accessibility, spatial distribution, and equity of subway systems. Using a multifaceted geospatial network analysis, the research integrates various methodologies to illuminate the complex role of socioeconomic factors in transportation inequalities. A notable result is that methodological choices significantly influence the assessment of transportation equity. The analysis spans both time and urban contexts, encompassing comparisons between four cities and different subway station buffer zones over a ten-year period. Key findings reveal a structured pattern of socioeconomic disparities, with systematic gradients across computational methods. Specifically, (1) income inequality is consistently influenced by the computational approach, with notable gradients across all cities; (2) workforce accessibility displays an urban-centric bias, with urban workers tend to experience longer commutes in practice compared to idealized models; and (3) gender-based workforce segmentation remains a persistent issue but is less sensitive to methodological variations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment\",\"volume\":\"146 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104909\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920925003190\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920925003190","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mapping mobility gaps: geospatial analysis of accessibility and equity from socioeconomic perspectives
This study explores social inequities in urban mobility by examining the accessibility, spatial distribution, and equity of subway systems. Using a multifaceted geospatial network analysis, the research integrates various methodologies to illuminate the complex role of socioeconomic factors in transportation inequalities. A notable result is that methodological choices significantly influence the assessment of transportation equity. The analysis spans both time and urban contexts, encompassing comparisons between four cities and different subway station buffer zones over a ten-year period. Key findings reveal a structured pattern of socioeconomic disparities, with systematic gradients across computational methods. Specifically, (1) income inequality is consistently influenced by the computational approach, with notable gradients across all cities; (2) workforce accessibility displays an urban-centric bias, with urban workers tend to experience longer commutes in practice compared to idealized models; and (3) gender-based workforce segmentation remains a persistent issue but is less sensitive to methodological variations.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment focuses on original research exploring the environmental impacts of transportation, policy responses to these impacts, and their implications for transportation system design, planning, and management. The journal comprehensively covers the interaction between transportation and the environment, ranging from local effects on specific geographical areas to global implications such as natural resource depletion and atmospheric pollution.
We welcome research papers across all transportation modes, including maritime, air, and land transportation, assessing their environmental impacts broadly. Papers addressing both mobile aspects and transportation infrastructure are considered. The journal prioritizes empirical findings and policy responses of regulatory, planning, technical, or fiscal nature. Articles are policy-driven, accessible, and applicable to readers from diverse disciplines, emphasizing relevance and practicality. We encourage interdisciplinary submissions and welcome contributions from economically developing and advanced countries alike, reflecting our international orientation.