{"title":"用句法复杂性指标评价二语写作的正式性:一种模糊评价方法","authors":"Zhiyun Huang , Guangyao Chen , Zhanhao Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.asw.2025.100973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Addressing the ambiguity in formality standards, this study introduces a cutting-edge Multi-dimensional Connection Cloud Model (MCCM) that leverages syntactic complexity indices to develop a fuzzy assessment model for formality in L2 writing. Employing Elastic Net Regression (ENR), the results revealed that four large-grained indices (mean length of sentence, mean length of T-unit, complex nominals per T-unit and complex nominals per clause), and one fine-grained index (average number of dependents per direct object) were significant in predicting the level of formality in L2 writing. To evaluate the model’s predictive power, 45 essays were used as a validation set. The MCCM model achieved a prediction accuracy of 91.1 % (41 out of 45 cases) in matching human ratings, with connection degrees effectively capturing classification uncertainty and boundary transitions. This pioneering framework effectively navigates the complexities and variable distributions of indicators, offering a more objective solution compared to conventional expert evaluations and introducing a novel methodological approach to assessing formality in academic writing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46865,"journal":{"name":"Assessing Writing","volume":"66 ","pages":"Article 100973"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing L2 writing formality using syntactic complexity indices: A fuzzy evaluation approach\",\"authors\":\"Zhiyun Huang , Guangyao Chen , Zhanhao Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.asw.2025.100973\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Addressing the ambiguity in formality standards, this study introduces a cutting-edge Multi-dimensional Connection Cloud Model (MCCM) that leverages syntactic complexity indices to develop a fuzzy assessment model for formality in L2 writing. Employing Elastic Net Regression (ENR), the results revealed that four large-grained indices (mean length of sentence, mean length of T-unit, complex nominals per T-unit and complex nominals per clause), and one fine-grained index (average number of dependents per direct object) were significant in predicting the level of formality in L2 writing. To evaluate the model’s predictive power, 45 essays were used as a validation set. The MCCM model achieved a prediction accuracy of 91.1 % (41 out of 45 cases) in matching human ratings, with connection degrees effectively capturing classification uncertainty and boundary transitions. This pioneering framework effectively navigates the complexities and variable distributions of indicators, offering a more objective solution compared to conventional expert evaluations and introducing a novel methodological approach to assessing formality in academic writing.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Assessing Writing\",\"volume\":\"66 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100973\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Assessing Writing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075293525000601\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessing Writing","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075293525000601","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
针对正式性标准的模糊性,本研究引入了一种前沿的多维连接云模型(mcm),该模型利用句法复杂性指数建立了二语写作正式性的模糊评估模型。采用弹性网络回归(Elastic Net Regression, ENR)分析发现,四个大粒度指标(句子平均长度、t -单位平均长度、每个t -单位复合语料和每个子句复合语料)和一个细粒度指标(每个直接宾语的平均依赖数)在预测二语写作的正式程度方面具有显著意义。为了评估模型的预测能力,45篇论文被用作验证集。MCCM模型在匹配人类评分方面的预测精度为91.1 %(45例中的41例),连接度有效地捕获了分类不确定性和边界转移。这个开创性的框架有效地驾驭了指标的复杂性和可变分布,与传统的专家评估相比,提供了一个更客观的解决方案,并引入了一种新的方法来评估学术写作的正式性。
Assessing L2 writing formality using syntactic complexity indices: A fuzzy evaluation approach
Addressing the ambiguity in formality standards, this study introduces a cutting-edge Multi-dimensional Connection Cloud Model (MCCM) that leverages syntactic complexity indices to develop a fuzzy assessment model for formality in L2 writing. Employing Elastic Net Regression (ENR), the results revealed that four large-grained indices (mean length of sentence, mean length of T-unit, complex nominals per T-unit and complex nominals per clause), and one fine-grained index (average number of dependents per direct object) were significant in predicting the level of formality in L2 writing. To evaluate the model’s predictive power, 45 essays were used as a validation set. The MCCM model achieved a prediction accuracy of 91.1 % (41 out of 45 cases) in matching human ratings, with connection degrees effectively capturing classification uncertainty and boundary transitions. This pioneering framework effectively navigates the complexities and variable distributions of indicators, offering a more objective solution compared to conventional expert evaluations and introducing a novel methodological approach to assessing formality in academic writing.
期刊介绍:
Assessing Writing is a refereed international journal providing a forum for ideas, research and practice on the assessment of written language. Assessing Writing publishes articles, book reviews, conference reports, and academic exchanges concerning writing assessments of all kinds, including traditional (direct and standardised forms of) testing of writing, alternative performance assessments (such as portfolios), workplace sampling and classroom assessment. The journal focuses on all stages of the writing assessment process, including needs evaluation, assessment creation, implementation, and validation, and test development.