Takuya Narita, Ai Ishizawa, Nobuyuki Inoue, Tetsuro Uchida, Yoshitsugu Nakamura
{"title":"重做主动脉根部手术移植物插入技术的中期结果。","authors":"Takuya Narita, Ai Ishizawa, Nobuyuki Inoue, Tetsuro Uchida, Yoshitsugu Nakamura","doi":"10.5761/atcs.oa.25-00047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluated the midterm outcomes, including adverse aortic events (AAEs), of the \"graft insertion technique\" (GIT) for left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) and aortic root reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From August 2014 to March 2024, 14 consecutive patients underwent GIT for LVOT and aortic root reconstruction. The indications for surgery were prosthetic valve endocarditis in 9 cases and noninfectious pseudoaneurysm in 5 cases. Among these patients, seven (50.0%) underwent aortic root surgery, while the other seven (50.0%) underwent aortic valve replacement alone or in combination with other procedures without aortic root surgery. Their mean EuroSCORE II was 28.8 ± 17.6.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean total operation time was 504 ± 87 min. The mean cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp times were 311 ± 41 and 240 ± 45 min, respectively. Operative mortality occurred in one case (7.1%), and five patients (35.7%) died during the first year of follow-up. No surviving patients experienced recurrent endocarditis. No patients died from cardiovascular events or infections after the second year of follow-up. Furthermore, no AAEs were observed on computed tomography during the follow-up period after hospital discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GIT is a feasible alternative for high-risk cases of redo aortic root surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":93877,"journal":{"name":"Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12256150/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Midterm Outcomes of Graft Insertion Technique for Redo Aortic Root Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Takuya Narita, Ai Ishizawa, Nobuyuki Inoue, Tetsuro Uchida, Yoshitsugu Nakamura\",\"doi\":\"10.5761/atcs.oa.25-00047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluated the midterm outcomes, including adverse aortic events (AAEs), of the \\\"graft insertion technique\\\" (GIT) for left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) and aortic root reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From August 2014 to March 2024, 14 consecutive patients underwent GIT for LVOT and aortic root reconstruction. The indications for surgery were prosthetic valve endocarditis in 9 cases and noninfectious pseudoaneurysm in 5 cases. Among these patients, seven (50.0%) underwent aortic root surgery, while the other seven (50.0%) underwent aortic valve replacement alone or in combination with other procedures without aortic root surgery. Their mean EuroSCORE II was 28.8 ± 17.6.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean total operation time was 504 ± 87 min. The mean cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp times were 311 ± 41 and 240 ± 45 min, respectively. Operative mortality occurred in one case (7.1%), and five patients (35.7%) died during the first year of follow-up. No surviving patients experienced recurrent endocarditis. No patients died from cardiovascular events or infections after the second year of follow-up. Furthermore, no AAEs were observed on computed tomography during the follow-up period after hospital discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GIT is a feasible alternative for high-risk cases of redo aortic root surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12256150/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.25-00047\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.25-00047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Midterm Outcomes of Graft Insertion Technique for Redo Aortic Root Surgery.
Purpose: This study evaluated the midterm outcomes, including adverse aortic events (AAEs), of the "graft insertion technique" (GIT) for left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) and aortic root reconstruction.
Methods: From August 2014 to March 2024, 14 consecutive patients underwent GIT for LVOT and aortic root reconstruction. The indications for surgery were prosthetic valve endocarditis in 9 cases and noninfectious pseudoaneurysm in 5 cases. Among these patients, seven (50.0%) underwent aortic root surgery, while the other seven (50.0%) underwent aortic valve replacement alone or in combination with other procedures without aortic root surgery. Their mean EuroSCORE II was 28.8 ± 17.6.
Results: The mean total operation time was 504 ± 87 min. The mean cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp times were 311 ± 41 and 240 ± 45 min, respectively. Operative mortality occurred in one case (7.1%), and five patients (35.7%) died during the first year of follow-up. No surviving patients experienced recurrent endocarditis. No patients died from cardiovascular events or infections after the second year of follow-up. Furthermore, no AAEs were observed on computed tomography during the follow-up period after hospital discharge.
Conclusion: GIT is a feasible alternative for high-risk cases of redo aortic root surgery.