通过集合、本土化和文化安全来维护本土学术主权。

IF 0.9 Q4 NURSING
Creative Nursing Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-10 DOI:10.1177/10784535251357218
Morgan A Torris-Hedlund, Donna-Marie Palakiko, Ebony Komene
{"title":"通过集合、本土化和文化安全来维护本土学术主权。","authors":"Morgan A Torris-Hedlund, Donna-Marie Palakiko, Ebony Komene","doi":"10.1177/10784535251357218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Colonial academic institutions systematically marginalize Indigenous scholars and devalue Indigenous knowledge systems by privileging methodologies, epistemologies, and structures rooted in White-dominant cultural norms. This exclusion is a structural feature of what this paper terms <i>colonial academia</i>. These systems persist in nursing education and research due to tenure and promotion criteria, Institutional Review Board protocols, publishing standards, and the underrepresentation of Indigenous faculty. These mechanisms function to suppress relational, land-based, and community-driven approaches fundamental to Indigenous ways of knowing. Focusing on nursing academia, we explore how Indigenous scholars can resist these systemic barriers through three interconnected strategies: assemblage, Indigenization, and cultural safety. We share how these strategies are applied across nursing education, research, and policy, enabling scholars to assert knowledge sovereignty while navigating institutional constraints. Assemblage allows for the selective incorporation of colonial tools into Indigenous frameworks. Indigenization aims to restructure institutions through Indigenous governance, ethics, and pedagogy. Cultural safety ensures these transformations are accountable to Indigenous communities. Together, these strategies challenge epistemic injustice and offer a model for transforming colonial institutions from within. By illustrating how Indigenous scholars lead these efforts, this paper contributes to global conversations on decolonization in health sciences and higher education.</p>","PeriodicalId":54104,"journal":{"name":"Creative Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"243-253"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Asserting Indigenous Academic Sovereignty Through Assemblage, Indigenization, and Cultural Safety.\",\"authors\":\"Morgan A Torris-Hedlund, Donna-Marie Palakiko, Ebony Komene\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10784535251357218\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Colonial academic institutions systematically marginalize Indigenous scholars and devalue Indigenous knowledge systems by privileging methodologies, epistemologies, and structures rooted in White-dominant cultural norms. This exclusion is a structural feature of what this paper terms <i>colonial academia</i>. These systems persist in nursing education and research due to tenure and promotion criteria, Institutional Review Board protocols, publishing standards, and the underrepresentation of Indigenous faculty. These mechanisms function to suppress relational, land-based, and community-driven approaches fundamental to Indigenous ways of knowing. Focusing on nursing academia, we explore how Indigenous scholars can resist these systemic barriers through three interconnected strategies: assemblage, Indigenization, and cultural safety. We share how these strategies are applied across nursing education, research, and policy, enabling scholars to assert knowledge sovereignty while navigating institutional constraints. Assemblage allows for the selective incorporation of colonial tools into Indigenous frameworks. Indigenization aims to restructure institutions through Indigenous governance, ethics, and pedagogy. Cultural safety ensures these transformations are accountable to Indigenous communities. Together, these strategies challenge epistemic injustice and offer a model for transforming colonial institutions from within. By illustrating how Indigenous scholars lead these efforts, this paper contributes to global conversations on decolonization in health sciences and higher education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Creative Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"243-253\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Creative Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10784535251357218\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Creative Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10784535251357218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

殖民地的学术机构系统地将土著学者边缘化,并通过赋予根植于白人主导文化规范的方法、认识论和结构特权,贬低土著知识体系。这种排斥是本文所称的殖民学术界的一个结构性特征。由于任期和晋升标准、机构审查委员会协议、出版标准以及土著教师代表性不足,这些系统在护理教育和研究中持续存在。这些机制的作用是抑制关系的、基于土地的和社区驱动的方法,这些方法是土著认识方式的基础。以护理学术界为重点,我们探讨了本土学者如何通过三种相互关联的策略:整合、本土化和文化安全来抵制这些系统性障碍。我们分享这些策略如何在护理教育、研究和政策中应用,使学者能够在导航制度约束的同时维护知识主权。组合允许有选择地将殖民地工具纳入土著框架。本土化的目的是通过土著治理、伦理和教学来重组机构。文化安全确保这些转变对土著社区负责。总之,这些策略挑战了认识上的不公正,并为从内部转变殖民制度提供了一种模式。通过说明土著学者如何领导这些努力,本文有助于就卫生科学和高等教育中的非殖民化问题进行全球对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Asserting Indigenous Academic Sovereignty Through Assemblage, Indigenization, and Cultural Safety.

Colonial academic institutions systematically marginalize Indigenous scholars and devalue Indigenous knowledge systems by privileging methodologies, epistemologies, and structures rooted in White-dominant cultural norms. This exclusion is a structural feature of what this paper terms colonial academia. These systems persist in nursing education and research due to tenure and promotion criteria, Institutional Review Board protocols, publishing standards, and the underrepresentation of Indigenous faculty. These mechanisms function to suppress relational, land-based, and community-driven approaches fundamental to Indigenous ways of knowing. Focusing on nursing academia, we explore how Indigenous scholars can resist these systemic barriers through three interconnected strategies: assemblage, Indigenization, and cultural safety. We share how these strategies are applied across nursing education, research, and policy, enabling scholars to assert knowledge sovereignty while navigating institutional constraints. Assemblage allows for the selective incorporation of colonial tools into Indigenous frameworks. Indigenization aims to restructure institutions through Indigenous governance, ethics, and pedagogy. Cultural safety ensures these transformations are accountable to Indigenous communities. Together, these strategies challenge epistemic injustice and offer a model for transforming colonial institutions from within. By illustrating how Indigenous scholars lead these efforts, this paper contributes to global conversations on decolonization in health sciences and higher education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Creative Nursing
Creative Nursing NURSING-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: Creative Nursing is an issue focused journal, unique in its recognition of the values inherent in the nursing profession. Excellence and professionalism are not exclusive to any one discipline or specialty, and the editors of Creative Nursing are dedicated to developing nursing leaders at all levels and in all settings. Today"s health care institutions need creative and innovative solutions. Nurses need to think creatively, to experiment, to take risks, and to innovate. Creative Nursing promotes best practices in all aspects of caring--caring for self, patients, families, colleagues, and communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信