是时候与路易体分享老年痴呆症的生物标志物结果了。

IF 4.4 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Melissa J Armstrong, Joshua D Grill, Thomas F Tropea
{"title":"是时候与路易体分享老年痴呆症的生物标志物结果了。","authors":"Melissa J Armstrong, Joshua D Grill, Thomas F Tropea","doi":"10.1002/dad2.70144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are increasing calls for sharing individual biomarker results with participants in dementia research. No studies investigate returning Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarker results to individuals with syndromic dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) even though most of these individuals have both pathologies. This perspective argues that AD biomarkers are valid, interpretable, and actionable, particularly relating to expected prognosis and treatment effects, in people with DLB. Thus, there is an ethical imperative to study AD biomarker result sharing in these patients. This will require revising current disclosure practices. Areas of need include unique pre- and post-test education and careful assessment of the readiness to receive results and post-result responses in people with DLB given the frequency of neuropsychiatric symptoms in this group. Studying responses to sharing AD biomarkers in people with DLB will also inform other dementia settings (e.g., returning synuclein results to individuals with syndromic AD) and neurodegenerative diseases more broadly.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>There are increasing calls for biomarker result sharing in dementia research.No processes exist to guide result sharing in dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB).Alzheimer biomarker results in DLB are valid, interpretable, and actionable.Research is needed on the methods and effects of sharing with people with DLB.Research is needed for sharing evidence of co-pathology across neurodegenerations.</p>","PeriodicalId":53226,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring","volume":"17 3","pages":"e70144"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12238827/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"It is time to share Alzheimer biomarker results in dementia with Lewy bodies.\",\"authors\":\"Melissa J Armstrong, Joshua D Grill, Thomas F Tropea\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/dad2.70144\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There are increasing calls for sharing individual biomarker results with participants in dementia research. No studies investigate returning Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarker results to individuals with syndromic dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) even though most of these individuals have both pathologies. This perspective argues that AD biomarkers are valid, interpretable, and actionable, particularly relating to expected prognosis and treatment effects, in people with DLB. Thus, there is an ethical imperative to study AD biomarker result sharing in these patients. This will require revising current disclosure practices. Areas of need include unique pre- and post-test education and careful assessment of the readiness to receive results and post-result responses in people with DLB given the frequency of neuropsychiatric symptoms in this group. Studying responses to sharing AD biomarkers in people with DLB will also inform other dementia settings (e.g., returning synuclein results to individuals with syndromic AD) and neurodegenerative diseases more broadly.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>There are increasing calls for biomarker result sharing in dementia research.No processes exist to guide result sharing in dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB).Alzheimer biomarker results in DLB are valid, interpretable, and actionable.Research is needed on the methods and effects of sharing with people with DLB.Research is needed for sharing evidence of co-pathology across neurodegenerations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"e70144\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12238827/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.70144\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.70144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

越来越多的人呼吁与痴呆症研究的参与者分享个人生物标志物的结果。没有研究调查返回阿尔茨海默病(AD)的生物标志物结果对患有路易体综合征性痴呆(DLB)的个体,即使大多数这些个体具有两种病理。这一观点认为,AD生物标志物是有效的、可解释的和可操作的,特别是与DLB患者的预期预后和治疗效果有关。因此,在这些患者中研究AD生物标志物结果共享具有伦理上的必要性。这就需要修改当前的信息披露做法。需要的领域包括独特的测试前和测试后教育,以及考虑到DLB患者神经精神症状的频率,对他们接受结果的准备程度和结果后反应的仔细评估。研究DLB患者对共享AD生物标志物的反应也将为其他痴呆症设置(例如,将突触核蛋白结果返回给综合征AD患者)和更广泛的神经退行性疾病提供信息。越来越多的人呼吁在痴呆症研究中共享生物标志物的结果。目前尚不存在指导路易体痴呆(DLB)结果共享的过程。DLB的阿尔茨海默生物标志物结果是有效的、可解释的和可操作的。需要对与生活障碍患者分享的方法和效果进行研究。需要进行研究,以共享神经退行性疾病的共同病理证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
It is time to share Alzheimer biomarker results in dementia with Lewy bodies.

There are increasing calls for sharing individual biomarker results with participants in dementia research. No studies investigate returning Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarker results to individuals with syndromic dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) even though most of these individuals have both pathologies. This perspective argues that AD biomarkers are valid, interpretable, and actionable, particularly relating to expected prognosis and treatment effects, in people with DLB. Thus, there is an ethical imperative to study AD biomarker result sharing in these patients. This will require revising current disclosure practices. Areas of need include unique pre- and post-test education and careful assessment of the readiness to receive results and post-result responses in people with DLB given the frequency of neuropsychiatric symptoms in this group. Studying responses to sharing AD biomarkers in people with DLB will also inform other dementia settings (e.g., returning synuclein results to individuals with syndromic AD) and neurodegenerative diseases more broadly.

Highlights: There are increasing calls for biomarker result sharing in dementia research.No processes exist to guide result sharing in dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB).Alzheimer biomarker results in DLB are valid, interpretable, and actionable.Research is needed on the methods and effects of sharing with people with DLB.Research is needed for sharing evidence of co-pathology across neurodegenerations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
7.50%
发文量
101
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Alzheimer''s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring (DADM) is an open access, peer-reviewed, journal from the Alzheimer''s Association® that will publish new research that reports the discovery, development and validation of instruments, technologies, algorithms, and innovative processes. Papers will cover a range of topics interested in the early and accurate detection of individuals with memory complaints and/or among asymptomatic individuals at elevated risk for various forms of memory disorders. The expectation for published papers will be to translate fundamental knowledge about the neurobiology of the disease into practical reports that describe both the conceptual and methodological aspects of the submitted scientific inquiry. Published topics will explore the development of biomarkers, surrogate markers, and conceptual/methodological challenges. Publication priority will be given to papers that 1) describe putative surrogate markers that accurately track disease progression, 2) biomarkers that fulfill international regulatory requirements, 3) reports from large, well-characterized population-based cohorts that comprise the heterogeneity and diversity of asymptomatic individuals and 4) algorithmic development that considers multi-marker arrays (e.g., integrated-omics, genetics, biofluids, imaging, etc.) and advanced computational analytics and technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信