{"title":"经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAV-in-SAV)中冠状动脉阻塞风险评估","authors":"Ai Kawamura, Kazuo Shimamura, Daisuke Yoshioka, Yusuke Misumi, Kizuku Yamashita, Shin Yajima, Koichi Maeda, Takuji Kawamura, Shunsuke Saito, Yutaka Matsuhiro, Shumpei Kosugi, Daisuke Nakamura, Isamu Mizote, Yasushi Sakata, Shigeru Miyagawa","doi":"10.1253/circj.CJ-24-1003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To consider transcatheter aortic valve-in-surgical aortic valve (TAV-in-SAV) as a secondary intervention, the risk of coronary obstruction during future TAV-in-SAV should be assessed prior to initial SAV replacement (SAVR), especially in Japanese patients with a small body size and aortic root anatomy. In this study we simulated the risk of coronary obstruction and identified associated anatomical factors.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed pre- and post-SAVR computed tomography scans of 115 patients and simulated the risk of coronary obstruction. High risk was defined as postoperative coronary arteries located below the risk plane (RP) and a valve-to-coronary distance <4 mm or a valve-to-aorta distance <2 mm; 28.7% of patients were classified as high risk. Preoperative right and left coronary artery heights of ≥22 and ≥18 mm, respectively, were important parameters for classifying patients with postoperative coronary arteries located above or below the RP. An expected valve-to-sinotubular junction (STJ) distance (defined as the difference between the preoperative STJ diameter and the expected internal valve diameter) ≥7 mm was another important parameter to stratify patients into low- and high-risk categories.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TAV-in-SAV was anatomically unfeasible in 28.7% of patients, and the coronary obstruction risk was associated with aortic root anatomy and implanted valve size. These results may provide a basis for considering TAV-in-SAV as a secondary option in Japanese patients with a small body size and aortic root anatomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":50691,"journal":{"name":"Circulation Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1472-1479"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation of Coronary Obstruction Risk for the Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Surgical Aortic Valve (TAV-in-SAV) Procedure.\",\"authors\":\"Ai Kawamura, Kazuo Shimamura, Daisuke Yoshioka, Yusuke Misumi, Kizuku Yamashita, Shin Yajima, Koichi Maeda, Takuji Kawamura, Shunsuke Saito, Yutaka Matsuhiro, Shumpei Kosugi, Daisuke Nakamura, Isamu Mizote, Yasushi Sakata, Shigeru Miyagawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1253/circj.CJ-24-1003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To consider transcatheter aortic valve-in-surgical aortic valve (TAV-in-SAV) as a secondary intervention, the risk of coronary obstruction during future TAV-in-SAV should be assessed prior to initial SAV replacement (SAVR), especially in Japanese patients with a small body size and aortic root anatomy. In this study we simulated the risk of coronary obstruction and identified associated anatomical factors.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed pre- and post-SAVR computed tomography scans of 115 patients and simulated the risk of coronary obstruction. High risk was defined as postoperative coronary arteries located below the risk plane (RP) and a valve-to-coronary distance <4 mm or a valve-to-aorta distance <2 mm; 28.7% of patients were classified as high risk. Preoperative right and left coronary artery heights of ≥22 and ≥18 mm, respectively, were important parameters for classifying patients with postoperative coronary arteries located above or below the RP. An expected valve-to-sinotubular junction (STJ) distance (defined as the difference between the preoperative STJ diameter and the expected internal valve diameter) ≥7 mm was another important parameter to stratify patients into low- and high-risk categories.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TAV-in-SAV was anatomically unfeasible in 28.7% of patients, and the coronary obstruction risk was associated with aortic root anatomy and implanted valve size. These results may provide a basis for considering TAV-in-SAV as a secondary option in Japanese patients with a small body size and aortic root anatomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1472-1479\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-24-1003\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-24-1003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Estimation of Coronary Obstruction Risk for the Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Surgical Aortic Valve (TAV-in-SAV) Procedure.
Background: To consider transcatheter aortic valve-in-surgical aortic valve (TAV-in-SAV) as a secondary intervention, the risk of coronary obstruction during future TAV-in-SAV should be assessed prior to initial SAV replacement (SAVR), especially in Japanese patients with a small body size and aortic root anatomy. In this study we simulated the risk of coronary obstruction and identified associated anatomical factors.
Methods and results: We retrospectively analyzed pre- and post-SAVR computed tomography scans of 115 patients and simulated the risk of coronary obstruction. High risk was defined as postoperative coronary arteries located below the risk plane (RP) and a valve-to-coronary distance <4 mm or a valve-to-aorta distance <2 mm; 28.7% of patients were classified as high risk. Preoperative right and left coronary artery heights of ≥22 and ≥18 mm, respectively, were important parameters for classifying patients with postoperative coronary arteries located above or below the RP. An expected valve-to-sinotubular junction (STJ) distance (defined as the difference between the preoperative STJ diameter and the expected internal valve diameter) ≥7 mm was another important parameter to stratify patients into low- and high-risk categories.
Conclusions: TAV-in-SAV was anatomically unfeasible in 28.7% of patients, and the coronary obstruction risk was associated with aortic root anatomy and implanted valve size. These results may provide a basis for considering TAV-in-SAV as a secondary option in Japanese patients with a small body size and aortic root anatomy.
期刊介绍:
Circulation publishes original research manuscripts, review articles, and other content related to cardiovascular health and disease, including observational studies, clinical trials, epidemiology, health services and outcomes studies, and advances in basic and translational research.