先天性膈疝手术治疗的挑战与争议。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Carmen Mesas Burgos, Erin E Perrone, Katrin Zahn, Holly L Hedrick
{"title":"先天性膈疝手术治疗的挑战与争议。","authors":"Carmen Mesas Burgos, Erin E Perrone, Katrin Zahn, Holly L Hedrick","doi":"10.1016/j.siny.2025.101648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a rare yet serious congenital condition marked by a diaphragmatic defect, pulmonary hypoplasia, and often pulmonary hypertension. While surgical repair is essential for survival, many controversies remain regarding its timing, approach, and techniques. Delayed repair after physiological stabilization is the current standard, though optimal timing varies. Earlier repair within 24-48 h may reduce hospital stay in some cases, while others benefit from extended stabilization. CDH patients on extracorporeal life support (ECLS) pose additional challenges, balancing bleeding risks against potential survival benefits when surgery is done on ECLS. Open surgical repair remains the gold standard, especially for large defects, with laparotomy preferred over thoracotomy. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS), although associated with better cosmetic and recovery outcomes, has higher recurrence rates and a steep learning curve. MIS is generally suited for smaller defects, though recent experience shows promising outcomes even in complex cases with patch repairs. Repair technique depends on defect size. Primary repair is preferred for small defects, while larger defects require synthetic or biological patches with emphasis on a tension-free repair for all defects. Synthetic patches offer strength but carry infection risks, whereas biological materials may lack durability. Muscle flap techniques offer an alternative, especially for recurrent or large defects. Recurrence remains a major concern, especially with large defects and patch repairs. Open reoperation is standard for recurrences, with MIS reserved for select cases. Prevention strategies include tension-free repair, appropriate patch choice, and meticulous technique. Emerging strategies, such as regenerative medicine, composite patches, and tissue engineering, show promise but are not yet widely available. Multicenter research, individualized care, and standardized reporting are essential to optimize outcomes and guide future innovations in CDH management.</p>","PeriodicalId":49547,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"101648"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenges and controversies in the surgical management of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia.\",\"authors\":\"Carmen Mesas Burgos, Erin E Perrone, Katrin Zahn, Holly L Hedrick\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.siny.2025.101648\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a rare yet serious congenital condition marked by a diaphragmatic defect, pulmonary hypoplasia, and often pulmonary hypertension. While surgical repair is essential for survival, many controversies remain regarding its timing, approach, and techniques. Delayed repair after physiological stabilization is the current standard, though optimal timing varies. Earlier repair within 24-48 h may reduce hospital stay in some cases, while others benefit from extended stabilization. CDH patients on extracorporeal life support (ECLS) pose additional challenges, balancing bleeding risks against potential survival benefits when surgery is done on ECLS. Open surgical repair remains the gold standard, especially for large defects, with laparotomy preferred over thoracotomy. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS), although associated with better cosmetic and recovery outcomes, has higher recurrence rates and a steep learning curve. MIS is generally suited for smaller defects, though recent experience shows promising outcomes even in complex cases with patch repairs. Repair technique depends on defect size. Primary repair is preferred for small defects, while larger defects require synthetic or biological patches with emphasis on a tension-free repair for all defects. Synthetic patches offer strength but carry infection risks, whereas biological materials may lack durability. Muscle flap techniques offer an alternative, especially for recurrent or large defects. Recurrence remains a major concern, especially with large defects and patch repairs. Open reoperation is standard for recurrences, with MIS reserved for select cases. Prevention strategies include tension-free repair, appropriate patch choice, and meticulous technique. Emerging strategies, such as regenerative medicine, composite patches, and tissue engineering, show promise but are not yet widely available. Multicenter research, individualized care, and standardized reporting are essential to optimize outcomes and guide future innovations in CDH management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"101648\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.siny.2025.101648\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.siny.2025.101648","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

先天性膈疝(CDH)是一种罕见但严重的先天性疾病,以膈缺损、肺发育不全和肺动脉高压为特征。虽然手术修复是生存所必需的,但关于手术的时机、方法和技术仍然存在许多争议。生理稳定后的延迟修复是目前的标准,尽管最佳时间各不相同。在某些情况下,24-48小时内的早期修复可以减少住院时间,而其他情况则受益于延长稳定时间。体外生命支持(ECLS)的CDH患者面临着额外的挑战,在体外生命支持下进行手术时,要平衡出血风险和潜在的生存益处。开放手术修复仍然是金标准,特别是对于大的缺陷,剖腹手术优于开胸手术。微创手术(MIS)虽然具有更好的美容效果和恢复效果,但其复发率较高,学习曲线陡峭。MIS通常适用于较小的缺陷,尽管最近的经验表明,即使在具有补丁修复的复杂情况下,也有很好的结果。修复技术取决于缺陷的大小。初级修复是小缺陷的首选,而较大的缺陷需要合成或生物补片,并强调对所有缺陷进行无张力修复。合成贴片具有强度,但有感染风险,而生物材料可能缺乏耐用性。肌肉瓣技术提供了另一种选择,特别是对于复发性或较大的缺陷。复发仍然是主要的问题,特别是对于大的缺陷和修补。开放性再手术是复发的标准,MIS保留用于选定的病例。预防策略包括无张力修复,适当的补片选择和细致的技术。新兴的策略,如再生医学、复合贴片和组织工程,显示出希望,但尚未广泛应用。多中心研究、个性化护理和标准化报告对于优化结果和指导未来CDH管理创新至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Challenges and controversies in the surgical management of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia.

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a rare yet serious congenital condition marked by a diaphragmatic defect, pulmonary hypoplasia, and often pulmonary hypertension. While surgical repair is essential for survival, many controversies remain regarding its timing, approach, and techniques. Delayed repair after physiological stabilization is the current standard, though optimal timing varies. Earlier repair within 24-48 h may reduce hospital stay in some cases, while others benefit from extended stabilization. CDH patients on extracorporeal life support (ECLS) pose additional challenges, balancing bleeding risks against potential survival benefits when surgery is done on ECLS. Open surgical repair remains the gold standard, especially for large defects, with laparotomy preferred over thoracotomy. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS), although associated with better cosmetic and recovery outcomes, has higher recurrence rates and a steep learning curve. MIS is generally suited for smaller defects, though recent experience shows promising outcomes even in complex cases with patch repairs. Repair technique depends on defect size. Primary repair is preferred for small defects, while larger defects require synthetic or biological patches with emphasis on a tension-free repair for all defects. Synthetic patches offer strength but carry infection risks, whereas biological materials may lack durability. Muscle flap techniques offer an alternative, especially for recurrent or large defects. Recurrence remains a major concern, especially with large defects and patch repairs. Open reoperation is standard for recurrences, with MIS reserved for select cases. Prevention strategies include tension-free repair, appropriate patch choice, and meticulous technique. Emerging strategies, such as regenerative medicine, composite patches, and tissue engineering, show promise but are not yet widely available. Multicenter research, individualized care, and standardized reporting are essential to optimize outcomes and guide future innovations in CDH management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.30%
发文量
49
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine (formerly Seminars in Neonatology) is a bi-monthly journal which publishes topic-based issues, including current ''Hot Topics'' on the latest advances in fetal and neonatal medicine. The Journal is of interest to obstetricians and maternal-fetal medicine specialists. The Journal commissions review-based content covering current clinical opinion on the care and treatment of the pregnant patient and the neonate and draws on the necessary specialist knowledge, including that of the pediatric pulmonologist, the pediatric infectious disease specialist, the surgeon, as well as the general pediatrician and obstetrician. Each topic-based issue is edited by an authority in their field and contains 8-10 articles. Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine provides: • Coverage of major developments in neonatal care; • Value to practising neonatologists, consultant and trainee pediatricians, obstetricians, midwives and fetal medicine specialists wishing to extend their knowledge in this field; • Up-to-date information in an attractive and relevant format.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信