传统和地区骨密度值与年轻和老年妇女力量和瘦质量关系的比较。

IF 1.2 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Journal of Mid-life Health Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-23 DOI:10.4103/jmh.jmh_186_24
Michele LeBlanc, Tracy White, Steve Hawkins
{"title":"传统和地区骨密度值与年轻和老年妇女力量和瘦质量关系的比较。","authors":"Michele LeBlanc, Tracy White, Steve Hawkins","doi":"10.4103/jmh.jmh_186_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While studies focused on the relationships between bone mineral density (BMD) and strength or lean body mass have been conducted, there are not studies that have investigated these relationships for both age groups using the same methodology and population criteria (especially physical activity levels).</p><p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the relationships between traditional and regional bone mineral density (BMD) and strength and lean mass values in younger and older women.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Forty-four younger (18-30 years) and 40 older (65-80 years) healthy females were recruited for this study. All had a physical activity rating of four or lower on the Physical Activity Rating Questionnaire. Muscle strength was tested for hand grip, leg press, and isokinetic knee flexion and extension. Total and regional lean body mass and BMD values were determined using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Correlations and stepwise regressions were run between traditional (hip, spine, and forearm) and regional (arm and leg) BMD and strength and lean mass values. Significance was determined with <i>P</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The relationships for traditional BMD and strength measures for the two groups were quite similar with few significant relationships being identified for either group. The two groups had differing relationships between traditional BMD values and lean mass measures. The relationships between regional BMD and strength and lean mass values had good agreement for the two groups for the arm, but not the leg.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The relationships investigated were most similar between the two age groups for the upper body but did not have good agreement for the lower body. These differences were likely due to greater declines in muscle quality associated with aging that occur more drastically for the lower body.</p>","PeriodicalId":37717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mid-life Health","volume":"16 2","pages":"137-143"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12237169/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Relationships between Traditional and Regional Bone Mineral Density Values and Strength and Lean Mass for Younger and Older Women.\",\"authors\":\"Michele LeBlanc, Tracy White, Steve Hawkins\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jmh.jmh_186_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While studies focused on the relationships between bone mineral density (BMD) and strength or lean body mass have been conducted, there are not studies that have investigated these relationships for both age groups using the same methodology and population criteria (especially physical activity levels).</p><p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the relationships between traditional and regional bone mineral density (BMD) and strength and lean mass values in younger and older women.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Forty-four younger (18-30 years) and 40 older (65-80 years) healthy females were recruited for this study. All had a physical activity rating of four or lower on the Physical Activity Rating Questionnaire. Muscle strength was tested for hand grip, leg press, and isokinetic knee flexion and extension. Total and regional lean body mass and BMD values were determined using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Correlations and stepwise regressions were run between traditional (hip, spine, and forearm) and regional (arm and leg) BMD and strength and lean mass values. Significance was determined with <i>P</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The relationships for traditional BMD and strength measures for the two groups were quite similar with few significant relationships being identified for either group. The two groups had differing relationships between traditional BMD values and lean mass measures. The relationships between regional BMD and strength and lean mass values had good agreement for the two groups for the arm, but not the leg.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The relationships investigated were most similar between the two age groups for the upper body but did not have good agreement for the lower body. These differences were likely due to greater declines in muscle quality associated with aging that occur more drastically for the lower body.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mid-life Health\",\"volume\":\"16 2\",\"pages\":\"137-143\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12237169/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mid-life Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmh.jmh_186_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mid-life Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmh.jmh_186_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然已经开展了关于骨密度(BMD)与力量或瘦体重之间关系的研究,但没有研究使用相同的方法和人口标准(特别是体力活动水平)调查两个年龄组之间的关系。目的和目的:本研究的目的是比较年轻和老年妇女的传统和地区骨密度(BMD)、力量和瘦质量值之间的关系。材料与方法:本研究招募了44名年轻(18-30岁)和40名年长(65-80岁)的健康女性。所有人在体力活动评分问卷上的体力活动评分都在4分或更低。肌肉力量测试的手握,腿压,和等速膝关节屈伸。采用双能x线吸收仪(DXA)测定总瘦体重和区域骨密度。在传统(髋关节、脊柱和前臂)和区域(手臂和腿部)骨密度、力量和瘦质量值之间进行相关性和逐步回归。P < 0.05。结果:两组传统骨密度和力量测量的关系非常相似,两组之间几乎没有明显的关系。两组在传统骨密度值和瘦体重测量值之间存在不同的关系。区域骨密度与力量和瘦质量值之间的关系在两组的手臂上有很好的一致性,但在腿部上没有。结论:调查的两个年龄组之间的关系在上半身最相似,但在下半身没有很好的一致性。这些差异可能是由于与衰老相关的肌肉质量下降幅度更大,下半身的肌肉质量下降幅度更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the Relationships between Traditional and Regional Bone Mineral Density Values and Strength and Lean Mass for Younger and Older Women.

Background: While studies focused on the relationships between bone mineral density (BMD) and strength or lean body mass have been conducted, there are not studies that have investigated these relationships for both age groups using the same methodology and population criteria (especially physical activity levels).

Aims and objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the relationships between traditional and regional bone mineral density (BMD) and strength and lean mass values in younger and older women.

Materials and methods: Forty-four younger (18-30 years) and 40 older (65-80 years) healthy females were recruited for this study. All had a physical activity rating of four or lower on the Physical Activity Rating Questionnaire. Muscle strength was tested for hand grip, leg press, and isokinetic knee flexion and extension. Total and regional lean body mass and BMD values were determined using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Correlations and stepwise regressions were run between traditional (hip, spine, and forearm) and regional (arm and leg) BMD and strength and lean mass values. Significance was determined with P < 0.05.

Results: The relationships for traditional BMD and strength measures for the two groups were quite similar with few significant relationships being identified for either group. The two groups had differing relationships between traditional BMD values and lean mass measures. The relationships between regional BMD and strength and lean mass values had good agreement for the two groups for the arm, but not the leg.

Conclusions: The relationships investigated were most similar between the two age groups for the upper body but did not have good agreement for the lower body. These differences were likely due to greater declines in muscle quality associated with aging that occur more drastically for the lower body.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mid-life Health
Journal of Mid-life Health Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
39
审稿时长
43 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of mid-life health is the official journal of the Indian Menopause society published Quarterly in January, April, July and October. It is peer reviewed, scientific journal of mid-life health and its problems. It includes all aspects of mid-life health, preventive as well as curative. The journal publishes on subjects such as gynecology, neurology, geriatrics, psychiatry, endocrinology, urology, andrology, psychology, healthy ageing, cardiovascular health, bone health, quality of life etc. as relevant of men and women in their midlife. The Journal provides a visible platform to the researchers as well as clinicians to publish their experiences in this area thereby helping in the promotion of mid-life health leading to healthy ageing, growing need due to increasing life expectancy. The Editorial team has maintained high standards and published original research papers, case reports and review articles from the best of the best contributors both national & international, consistently so that now, it has become a great tool in the hands of menopause practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信